Jurors deliberate in love triangle murder trial

The prosecution wholly failed in this instance to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Carla Hughes was the killer of Avis Banks. We can all agree that this was a sensless and tragic death, but in order to put someone to death for a capital murder crime you MUST exclude any and all other theories, meaning that there is absolutely no one else that could possibly have commited this crime. Now having said that let’s put this into prospective. First, the infamous gun. There is nothing to prove that Carla Hughes fired the shots that aided in killing Avis Banks. On the other hand, Keyon Pittman was found to have had gun residue on his hands. Two, there was no DNA or witnesses to show that Carla Hughes was ever at the Banks home let alone there on the night of the murder. Three, Mr. Pittman, upon finding his fiance’s body ran across the street, while holding his cellphone to call 911. Mind you prior to him calling 911 he called the other 2 women he was sleeping with to inform them that “something had happened” to Avis. Mr. Pittman remained across the street at a neighbors home until the police arrived. Mr. Pittman disappeared from practice for almost 1 hour the night before a big game. He had access to Carla Hughes’ home on the night of the murder. The shoes that were found were worn by both Hughes and Pittman. As you can see there is far more reasonable doubt there to find Ms. Hughes NOT GUILTY. This is a capital murder trial, meaning you get one bite at the apple. In my opinion, the prosecution has not proven its case. While I believe Ms. Hughes is guilty of make the bad decision to date Mr. Pittman, I do not believe that she is guilty of committing this crime based on the lack of evidence presented. Lest we not forget that it is not her job to prove her innocence.

I watched the closing arguements. I was SHOCKED when the prosecuter said that Pittman wasn't smart enough to commit this crime because he was "only a basketball coach". What all basketball coaches aren't smart?.. I've watched this trial from the very beginning and do not believe that the state proved their case... there is definately reasonable dought that Carla did not kill Avis.

this is a tough case

I think that the prosecutors did not present a good case against Carla Hughes neither did the defense attorneys for Hughes. Where are the bloody clothes? Why did Pittman call her so many times that day? First, he called Avis Banks parents to see if they heard from her cause she havent called him all day? Second, where was he at the school doing those 30 to 45 mins? On a good day it only takes 10 mins to get to his home from that school this i know. Third, why did he call
Carla when he found Avis Banks body to tell her that she wasnt dead and that he was going to finish her off? Fourth, if Carla killed Avis that was just to much time to shoot someone then stabb them repeatedly. Of course there was blood so y didnt she dispose of the shoes when she dispose of her clothes. Lastly, there is just not enough evidence. She didnt do it by herself, to many holes in this story.

I really hate that this 28 yr old woman going through this. I also feel bad for the family that lost there love one. Ms. Hughes really need to tell the truth about everything and Mr. Pittman. Ms. Hughes have to realize that she have a child and that her child going through a lot with this trail. Whoever did this to that lady will answer to GOD!!!

I wonder have Carla mother had a one on one talk with her child ,and told her this is her life on the line ,it no time play around .what ever she know it time to say about keyon pittmam because he has sold her up the river .

Mr.Walls did an excellent job presenting his closing arguments!! I think that the wrong person was charged with this murder!! Not only that the evidence in what the (Prosecution and the Defense) has proves the person that had the most to gain from her murder was "Pittman"!! So he could continue to Manipulate,Scheme,Lie and get "Banks "and "Hughes" out of the way and to continue with his lying,cheating ways. This was such a perfect set-up that I believe "EVEN" the "POLICE" believed it!! "YES" he set her up to take the wrap for him and has gotten away with it so far?? No dusting for finger-prints on the door-jam? Come-on?? Really?? Then the blood on the shoes OPPPS....Blood then no blood?? WHAT?? No-way.....She's innocent...IMHO

My only question to Ms Hughes is, 'Was it really worth it?'

Smith, IL

just because she looks innocent does not mean she did not do this to me her expression on her face is prove it i have nothing to say and why can't we know were she target practice at

I have a question for the woman on trial ; This woman is a teacher , a smart , beautiful, independant GROWN WOMAN , how is it that i'm 25 years old and i have had my share of heartbreak and i'm stil holding on to some kind of hope that a good woman can make a good man (only if he's the right one) some men are just made for the hookers and strippers of the world but you still have even more men out here that can be your Mr. Right or Mr. Right now , whatever the case I presume my question would be; Why not just find someone else? Why put all your eggs in one basket ? WHY?

i believe she let her emotions get caught up in the moment

The prosecuter gave a good closing argument, and honestly I believe the prosecution presents a more confident arguement. Mr. Walls hasn't been very moving. However it is the facts and lack of such facts that still have me wondering. And the law clearly states she must be found guilty beyond any doubt. I have doubts, my thoughts continue to go back to Pittman and the one thing I am convinced of is that his hands are not clean,,,,and something else is going on here.

If you was target shooting how did bullets get to the crime area

I think Mr. Pittman is going to get away with this murder. If not the fact he comitted this crime he Definately had something to do with it. I mean come on NO TEARS!!!! He is guilty if not for the murder or conspiracy at least. That man has no remorse or sadness. He is simply a pig.

I would ask Carla Hughes if she needed the gun for protection why did she "Use all the ammo for target practice" when she wouldn't of had any to protect herself if she had to defend off a burgular.

I hope Carla Hughes is found not guilty in this case. It's apparent that this was clearly an act of DECEPTION on behalf of Kenyon Pittman and I hope he is brought to justice because he for know he has gotten away with MURDER. They have no evidence that Carla Hughes committed this crime.

If I could ask Carla HUghs a question it would be: When, With Who and where did you use the gun for target practice? Why did you return it now, are you no longer in fear of a break in?

I did not realize that the prosecution had so much evidence against Ms. Hughes. The cell phone tower information is very damming to the defenses case.

I believe that Keyon Pittman either knew that Avis was going to be murdered and/or helped murder her. He is a scandalous man.

I have watched this entire trial and it doesn't take a rocket scientist to realize that although she does look like a nice school teacher, this was a crime of passion and who else would have been so enraged but Carla Hughes to commit this horrible crime. I do feel that Keyon Pittman is partially to blame for this because if he had been faithful and not playing around with all of these other women, this tragedy would never have occured!

Keyon Pittman should be on trial. It is obvious that a human life isn't important to him. He put several women at risk for sexual transmitted diseases. No protected sex. Just a loose cannon. It is sad that the police department didn't do a better job. Keyon Pittman knew that Carla Hughes had the gun for protection. He wore her shoes and he wasn't at basketball practice as he stated in his testimony. Carla Hughes should be aquitted .. She isn't the one who should have been on trial.

I can honestly say, I can understand partically what Carla Hughes is going through. I say she shouldn't get the death penalty, killing Carla is not going to bring her back but I know Mrs. Banks family does not feel like that but, this situation goes back to Mr. Keon (excuse my spelling) is responsible for her death because he played Carla and this relationship that Keon had started between two womens is uncall for. I am very disapponinted in Carla, the devil set her up and she fell through the cranks. She should of used self control in this situtation and something is wrong with this picture. I pray for Carla and her family to understand and to accept what GOD will show. That Keon is getting off scott free. God Bless the Banks Family

I think everyone also missed the fact that Hughs cousin,mother,and cousins dad had panick in common. All of them had a reason for their actions. Which means they all knew something about Hughs and Avis that was never mentioned. Like maybe an arguement between the two!

What if Mr Pittman find somebody pass to them the key to her apartment locate him were is put the gun and shoes & knife go to is
home did the crime. Then he make shore that after the crime been commit the helper back some were place the evidence then he leaving the game to go back pick up the evidence place it back in her apartment. Why do so many people,s try to defending Pittman it seem like he have more then the number,s of lover,s as count
Well if any body is manipulator is Pittman thank you?

The screen says the deliberated for 4 hours TUESDAY!

I would ask her where is the knife?

The defense has been telling the jury how smart Carla Hughes
is and that may be true, but she knowingly got involved with a man
who was engaged to another woman and she doesn't have custody
of her own child, so that tells me that we're not hearing the whole
story about this woman.

I dont think carla killed avis but i think she knows what happen and i think she should say something before its to late he's a free man and out in the world living his life while she(carla) is in prison.

I believe there is doubt in this case , by the way how long after Keyon Pittman's fiance was murdered did he remarry? Keyon Pittman did murder his fiance.........

Too much coincidence that the same gun was borrowed from the cousin, the knife also borrowed was never returned. A person might be highly educated, but passions are passions, and this woman wanted that man and she was interfering with his relationship. First of all, an educated woman should have not forgotten the sense of decency and get involved with a man practically married, since he was living with the poor victims, inocent of all this sordid affair. Mr. Pittman is not a very nice character either, could not keep his pants zipped up. Morally, he is just as guilty as the murderer.

My question would be to Clara Hughes is, after hearing about the death of Avis Banks, and it appeared that you was framed why did you turn in the gun?

I would ask Carla Hughes, if you were so afraid for your safety where you lived why did you return the gun six days after you borrowed it ?
It kinda sounds funny to me.

What will you tell your son, Carla does Keyon mean more to you rather than your own flesh and blood.

If I could ask Carla Hughes one question, it would be this: "do you regret ever being involved with Keyon Pittman?"

I would ask Carla Hughes " If you borrowed the gun for protection Why did you return it after someone you knew was murdered?"

The defense says that carla hughes is a nice nonviolent person, that maybe but clearly she's lost that title the day she murdered Avis and her unborn baby. We all know nice nonviolent people who lose it, you hear about them every other day. Not to mention only a scorned woman woul slash another womans face that was a jealousy type act. I wonder what carla's mother in her heart of hearts believe about her daughter's guilt or innocence.

My One question to Carla Hughes – had she taken the stand would have been – What transpired for you to return the gun and knife (on Fri) you had borrowed from your cousin (on Sunday), for fear of your safety, less than one week after taKING POSSESSION OF IT?

No one seems to mention that Hughs could have hired people to do it for her. She may have provided the weapons for someone else that was thirsty for money. Its not hard to find a neighborhood drug addict to do something like this.

I think Keyon went to Carla's house (when he went to go leave his groceries) , retrieved the gun and the knife, and either went to go kill his fiance Avis Banks alone or with the assistance of Carla Hughes. Either way, I think the jury should put more of the spot light on Keyon because i have reason to believe Carla didn't murder Avis Banks alone if at all!!!!!!!!

I have been following this trial for several days and I objectively think the following: Carla Hughes is astute and well educated "supposedly". Why would she allow the jurors to think she had something to hide by not testifying. If I were in her shoes, I would confidently defend my honor, and integrity by pleading my case in my own words. And where did she go target practicing? and with whom?
In regards to Keyon, he has the ability to be a manipulator. However looking at the time line of the death, would he have enough time to drive home, kill Avis, take the shoes back to Carla's home along with the clean gun and report back to work.
Concerning guilt and sympathy on both parties part (Keyon and Carla) neither one is demonstrating the characteristics of people wrongly accused.

I must say that listeining to this case, can Keon really look back and say was this worth it to use women to get his way? Playing both sides is very wrong and it's not fair. Keon is a DOG and these beautiful women lost their lives over a MAN. Carla should of used self control and Keon should've been a MAN and say NO. Can Carla say was it worth it?

Keyon Pittman is/was a spider that spun a vicous web through every woman he came into contact with. While Hughes is obviously guilty for this horrendous crime by becoming obsessed with Pittman, this is a case of fatal attaraction. It is hard to believe that any other woman would marry Keyon after such a henious crime that would never have occured if he had not been so controlling and womanizing. My condolences go out to the Banks family...

there is no actual DNA of hers that puts her at that crime scene . . .keyon pittman is involved an should be the one as top suspect !!!!

I have a nagging feeling in me that something else was going on in this love triangle. I know all the evidence points to Carla but something in me feels there is something else that keeps me from wanting to convict her and I can not shake that feeling so I guess that I would find that resonable cause not to convict???!!!

i believe all the circumstantial evidence points to defendant and not testifiying to innocence does'nt help her case.

Keyon Pittman is not the first man to have a 3-way love affair. Everyone says Carla Hughes character was _ but people change! Hughes had means and motives for murdering Avis Banks, if Keyon was involved why wouldn't she point him out by taking the witness stand. Johnny Walls cases always end in miss trials or hung jury for some reason! Not this time Mr. Walls, she is guilty!!!!!!

Guilty Guilty She's sooo Guilty, she can now do dome teaching where she going now, The big house !!!!

In closing arugment the Prosecutors clearly said that around 5:36 or around 6:00 Keyon was in his car behind Avis going home. How could this be if he indeed was at basketball practice. I believe that Keyon is the KILLER he could not get his story right back in 2006. He is doing more playing like he is crying now than he did back when this first happen.

My heart goes out to Carla being that I have known her,throughout my school years! She always have been sweet, smart,and outgoing she made me want to be a cheer leader!lol! God has the last judgement call in this matter. No human has the right to take the life(lives) of another human!may god continue to hold banks and family. I hope the judgement is made on the right person.

It saddens me that we, as a country, will weigh guilt or innocence by what a person looks like or their standing in the community. REALLY! Ted Bundy was a handsome man, an attorney and well known in the community, Our President has the highest standing in our nation, he fell. So really what does looks, appearence, or social standing mean. I hope to GOD if I'm ever on trial the jury only looks at all of the evidence that is presented and renders a verdict. Remember passion is powerful. Murder is as old as Cain and Abel. Senseless!

whats the diffences between capitol murder and 1st or sdecond degree murder

Men leave their pregnant women and children everyday all day in this day and age so i'm not buying keyon wanted her dead as much as carla on the other hand carla thought she would gain everything that Avis had , she's your typical jealous hater . Keyon is your local houndog true, but women have to be responsible carla knew the man was engaged she participated in being used by keyon you can't complain when you do that. unfortunately this probably is not the 1st case and won't be the last women pay attention.

I have a feeling that justice will not be served in this case due to Senator Walls and all of his smoke and mirrors.Carla is guilty and Keyon could be guilty too, but she will get off because she has a high powered lawyer. There will be no justice for Avis and her unborn child.

I feel that she was in a lovers triangle and did the dirty work for her lover. He wanted to get rid of the mother and the baby in her womb. She loved him enough to kill for him. Carla was very confused by the love of him to actually kill for him. Some people think she was innocent but, I feel she was confused with him to kill for him. I feel she went to his home to confront his fiance' about the affair and things got out of hand and ended in murder.

I think that there is too much doubt on weather Carla Huges killed Avis Banks. No one saw Carla. i don't think she [Carla] is capable of kicking in a door, she is very educated and it seem to fit such a brutal crime. Mr. Pittman was missing for 30 to 40 minutes .

They keep saying that Pittman didnt want to be married, but he is....also I cant believe that if Pittman did it, why isnt carla saying that he did it....and where did she go with the gun, if she got the gun for Pittman, why isnt she telling it????

I believe Ms. Hughes is involved in the murder of Avis Banks. There are alot of peacful people around that behave differantly when it comes to their personal life. Although I do not believe the prosecution has not proven that she was the one that actually pulled the trigger.

i think both the defense and prosecuting attorneys have some unanswered questions that can cause this to be a mistrial. lack of evidence on the prosecutions part can hurt them. lack of the defendant not testifying could hurt the defense.

If Carla had taking the stand I would have ask her, was Keyon aware of the gun that she had in he home.
Efrem Stokes

You know what i dont get, Okay lets say pittman did it, he had carla shoes on and he kills avis, leave the scene take the bloody shoes back to her place and the gun, change shoes and go back to the school, where is the blood in his car from the shoes?

I was engaged to get married to a man and I was pregant from the engaged man and he left me for another woman (he married) and he put me down because I didn't fit into his world. He put on this game to her that the baby was not his and that I slept around because I had two children from two different fathers. He put up a DNA to take and still the baby is his. I knew it and he did too. Carla should have used self control not to kill and Keon will pay for this spritually because GOD will handle this. I could of been in her seat where Carla is sitting. I had to pray to GOD to get me through this and he did. THANK YOU JESUS.

If Carla had taking the stand I would have ask her, was Keyon aware of the gun that she had in he home.
Efrem Stokes from Pelahatchie Mississippi

I think Carla and Pittman both committed this trouble crime. I think he used her to act out this crime. I think both of them should be on trial together. Pittman was on stand crying fake tears. And at one point I thoguht he was cracking a smile. Who ever did this God rest their soul.

does she have a history of violence. i thought that you need a backround check to be a teacher. isnt stabbing her after she was dead over kill for a woman.? also in a differnt senerio...did he find her dead and then call her to see if she did it...and then panic and call his mom like oh shit what do i do now? so maybe she 9(the defendent ) called back and say what the heck are u talking about ?u think i killed her?

This woman Carla is so guilty. WHERE IS THE KNIFE???????

really i think this case is more about carla being guilty then innocent vs her being innocent until being proven guilty. first of all keyon should be on trial just as much if not more than carla. there is no physical evidence to link carla to the murders. furthermore keyon would logically speaking have more motive based on the fact that 1. ava was pregnant, 2. he was engaged to a woman that he obviously didn't want, 3. was playing 3 women at the same time, and 4. possibly was on the verge of getting found out by carla. i'm a several times over convicted felon. one thing about a criminal is that we know another criminal, and firing a gun for target practice doesn't make you a murderer. the gun residue was found on keyon not carla. yeah it can be transfered but the investigators should've tested all of carla's clothes....they didn't. the defense has proved reasonable doub't.

I am curious as to why NO ONE sent an investigator to the scene where Carla Hughs was suppose to be "Target Practicing" to search for shell casings.???????

what testimony if any was introduced by the prosecution or defense concerning the knife...what happened to it...why wasn't it returned etc?

Ashleigh, Are you blind???? This woman Carla IS NOT BEAUTIFUL. You need to clean your glasses. Young and beautiful-not!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Does the victim's family believe the accusations against the defendant or do they question the actions of keyon pittman and his possible/probable involvement in this murder......

One thing missing ........perhaps HE took the gun , used it , she is covering for him and at this stage of the game is afraid to change her story.. why didn't I hear this possibility from anyone ? this womanizer had all of them wrapped around his little finger !

He stole the gun,knife and shoes when he went to Hughes apt before he went to work(when he claims he purchased groceries that day for Hughes) he then returned those items when he returned after work that day. That's why he could not give the coach a ride home because he had to return those items to Hughes apt.
Why would you care about purchasing groceries for a so called sex only person?
He did not go home after work because he wanted Banks body to have time to start decomposing , it makes it harder to determine time of death.
He wore those shoes a while back because it was then he began to think and plan Banks murder.

The Hughes case will result in a Hung Jury!!! This is the most obvious case of the person responsible for this murder is not on trial. Keyon Pittman is a liar, cheater, and control freak. I do not believe for a minute that he wasn't glad that Avis is dead. If Carla killed Avis, Keyon convinved her they would be together. These prosecutors obviously do not understand the power of control Keyon had over his women. Too bad Jamie Floyd has not been commenting on this case. I usually do not agree with her but she would have been right on this one.

This woman is as guilty as sin !!!!!!! I am a black professional woman, and I hate to see this woman wasting her life away behind bars or her even getting the death penalty. However, the fact that she is well educated is not an excuse for murder. If she was innocent then she would of made sure that her side of the story was told, and she would have got on the stand and fought for her life!!!!!!

I dont know what everyone else see regarding the Carla Hughes. If you just look at her eyes she looks like she could kill someone. The eyes dont lie. She looks shifty and eyes tell the hold story.

What about the testimony by Carla's cousin.......did he not say Carla came to him AFTER KEYON SUGGESTED SHE GET A GUN FOR HER PROTECTION ? What did he say in those conversations immediately after the discovery of the body. Could he have influenced the sequence of events resulting in Carla returning the gun to her cousin, "as is" and without the knife. Would a call from your lover seemingly concerned of how it may look and suggesting you remove anything suggestive of foul play be effective. It sounds to me that Keyon has a way of manipulating women and could he could easily be "the Puppet Master" whether it be in the framing of Carla, or Conspiracy, etc. He opens the door for countless scenario that are not only possible but probable.

did they do balistics on that gun she borrowed from her cousin to match the bullets used to kill avis????

I can't decide if Carla Hughes is guilty. But, why would she work so hard for her degrees and throw it all away on a man who is obviously a womanizer and not committed to anyone?

A Brand new house with no house alarm set that particular day.
She did it. She kicked in the door with her crazy power. Undid the fiancees belongs and waited for the garage door to close and the car door to slam. She already knew where her love interest would be.(at School) Too bad nobody saw her. Just the cell phone located her.

I strongly believe this woman has been framed. The fiance did it!

Can not gather enough evidence.

it coulda been either one of them 2 that murdered this women and child. there is defentaley a resonable doubt i couldnt convict her, but on ther other hand ,if shes inacent she shoulda took the stand.

It does not take a genius to deduce that Carla Hughes is guilty of murder. I think the jury is having a problem with the fact that she may receive the death penalty. The bloody shoes, the gun, the knife, and her refusal to testify all point to Hughes. The brutality of the crime leads me to believe that Pittman was not involved. It was overkill that points only to a jealous lover.

I think that its sad Mr. Banks isn't on trial for the murder of his wife because it is obvious he committed this crime. Beyond a reasonable doubt there is no way that Carla did this horrific act. The one thing that Carla did was get caught up in loving a man to the point of being manipulated into his web of deceit.

i would like to know if she in jail or out on bail.

Come on... lets get over the educational and family background or how attractive this defendant is, she was indeed athletic enough, one of such being a motorcycle rider capable of breaking in the back door. This is not a first case scenario... recently there are many where celebrity status defendants have been convinced c.f. Phil Specter and the many more. This jealous hussy murdered her innocent rival...
Yes truly, this case is based only on an abundant amount of circumstantial evidence i.e. no smoking gun nor forensic evidence however, her defense by lawyers to create a 'reasonable doubt' was blowing smoke in an attempt to mold and twine the states evidence into a fairy tale of what could have been, which is their job to create, many jurors do not have the ability to divide nor sort the truth from fantasy, that is their holding... what is referred to as 'street smarts', This all said, her fate is probably 'best' left in the hands of the jury howbeit, I fear a guilty woman my go free....

If Carla Hughes picked up the gun and knife from her cousin, and then returned them a few days later, how could she explain the fact that Keyon used the gun and knife to murder Avis? Did he steal it from her house and then replace it there after? I never heard a word in the testimonies on how he would have gotten the gun from her house. Also, where were the gun and knife right after the murder, if the police came soon after. Did he hide the weapons in the bush? I think there's a lot of doubt in this case. I seriously think she's guilty.

The more I hear about this case, the more it bothers me. Someone compaired this guy to Scott Peterson. What they forgot to mention is the fact that Scott Peterson had motive to get rid of his wife. He wanted to persue a relationship with Amber, who did not live in the same town that he did, and that would of been difficult. In this case, this guy lived in close proximity with all of his women, and he had his cake and was eating it too!!! Therefore, he was happy. He had it all. He had no reason to kill his fiance. He may have been a cheater, but that does not make him a murderer. What he did was wrong, but he did not kill her.

i believe huges did murder, banks and believe me you, pittman was very much aware of what huges was goin to do,i do think his big forehead should be on trial too,while hes sitting on the stand tring like mad to scrap up some real tears,my husband would be cring so hard that he wouldn't be able to talk,please don't let that man get away with this because it takes 2 to tangle.

How come she was smart enough to remove all fingerprint but not the blood on the shoes. Think about it, if you wanted to frame someone you would leave the blood on the shoe because you could and no finger prints because you could not leave hers. NOT GUILTY

I will be glad when people in this country will stop getting a pass for their social status. Just because a person has multiple degrees or money does not mean they are immune to committing crime, they are human beings just like everyone else.

Carla is not innocent she was in love with this man and for the mere fact that she had twice went to the home of the deceast to have sex with this man say's alot about her character. We know that he had other woman in addition to Carla, but there were no evidence that she dated another man. She was emotionally attached to this man she's a woman scorned . If she did not commit the murder she is an accessory ...

I live in Mississippi, about 50 miles from where this trial is taken place. Since it is a local case, I have been following this trial. My wife and I are both retired teachers and I know the school where Ms. Hughes taught personally.
After listening to the coverage and reading the news paper accounts, I must say that she ought to be happy that I was not called for her trial. I would vote at once to convict her of the charges but would refuse to vote for the death penalty. And that is not because I do not think she deserves it, I have a religious reason for refusing to apply the death penalty to anyone.
It is ashame that in Mississippi we cannot convict someone of being an immoral person, the boyfriend would definitly be convicted of it.

He got her cell phone and left his cell phone, that's why he did not call 911 fro the cell phone because they would have known that he had her cell phone. He used her shoes and returned them back to her closet so that the police could fine them. he is a SNAKE IN THE GRASS.

Ms. Hughe is innocent and I hope the jury with fine that to be and they charge the right person. Mr. Pittman with the crime HE committed.

keyon, i feel had time before the murder to. 1. get shoes from carla resident he had a key. 2 his were abouts between the hrs. of 5-6 or 5-7. an the gun carla rec. from cousin was it after the break in her home. an did keyon know that she had gun in her procession.

Isnt there a way to see what size foot was in a shoe?
I can wear a pair thats too small or big but if there is a bloody foot print left behind, is there any way to tell the shoes were not the right size? Id imgine a mans foot may fit into a womans shoe, but are not the same as a womans foot.

The comment that this woman is somehow above this crime because she is a school teacher is making me sick. Shes human, she was screwing around with a engaged man, why WOULDNT she be suspect?

I serious doubt anyone thinks woman could not commit a crime like this as was mentioned by Jack FOrd.
Lizzy Borden, Charles Mansons gang was mostly woman, Susan Smith.
I Dont think anyone thinks: A woman couldnt commit a crime like this because history shows they have.

Id like to know what makes a murderer? SInce its brought up too many times in this case, oh shes educated, shes young, shes beautiful.
SO what? Only the shabby & ugly can kill?

Last comment, why did the boyfriend pause when asked: DO you know who killed Avis Banks?
Between the dry tears, & the dramtic pause I think he was in on it.

can you tell me where or how I can get a copy of the jury charge in the Hughes trial.

No way would Carla Hughes give the gun and knife to Pittman, get it back, clean it and return it to her cousin, lie about "target practicing" with 5 rounds; sit in jail for 3 years while he dates others and get married...

And NOT "squeal" on him !!! If she was jealous enough to kill a pregnant fiancee.... she would be too jealous to sit in jail for three years, go on trial, pay for lawyers and NOT say "Pittman" did it... She WOULD NOT let him get away with it and face it all alone , with a 5yr old child at home...

Her face says it all....... she is not expressive enough; showing the the obsurdity that "I didn't do it".... She just sits there knowing that this moment of "insane jealousy", she now has to pay for...

Darlene

Play the interview while the jurors debate.

I feel that if she is so educated and professional why would she even become envolved with a co-worked, and one who has a fiance. She did not have another male friend, so we know that he was the center of her world, and she became obsessed with this man and I believe that she could have committed this murder.

I have been listening and watching this trial via all of your in session shows as well as here in my local media. I have to say that the most direct and fact based argument I have heard was not by any of the headlining attourneys but by Sen. Wall's co- council, Mr Dorsey. He made so many clear cut points that could not be disputed factually. It was refreshing in a trial SO full of conjecture and circumstance. Finally someone touched on many of the points that have been aggrivating throughout this trial.

THE SHOE PRINT. ADA John Emfinger stated that Carla had the strenght to kick in the door. To put this much force behide her (carla) would had to hold on something, but I didn't see a railing that she could have held on to in the pictures presented to the court, how did she keep her balance to do this much damage to a lock door on stairs.

I think Pitman did it, Carla Hughes innocent.

In the debate of if there was or even could be gun powder on the dead body the defense said that there are only three ways to get gun powder on something and that is if you fire a gun, if your in the presence of a gun being fired, or if you come in direct contact with the gun powder. The defense states that there is no way that even if the man involved did in fact touch the body he could have gotten the gun powder on him that way. However if you are shot by a gun in close range such as in this situation then you would be in the presence of a gun being fired. This in return could explain the gun powder on his hands, if he did touch the body and not just kneel over it. Not a good argument made by the defense in my opinion.

In my opion,Keyon Pittman is the killer. Prehaps he tricked Carla Hughes into acquiring the gun and knife,but he is the one who used them. Carla did not testify , because she will impilicate herself in the crime.

Judging a book buy it's cover...It seems to me that both Carla and Keyon should be in question. Carla probably gave the gun and shoes to Keyon and Keyon went to do the dirty work and brought the gun and shoes back to Carla. It also seems both tried to have an alibi but none panned out. Seems like a Tag Team Murder to me.

If Carla Hughes had taken the stand the prosecutor should have asked her when and were she went target practicing?, If she was so afraid of being attacked why did she not purchase a gun for protection after returning the gun to the cousin? what happened to the knife??

I've been following this trial as well and I must agree with Bethany, Mr. Dorsey is the best thing walking today, his closing is better than the defense that was put on for Carla Hughes. There is too much REASONABLE DOUBT to convict her, the prosecution has NOT proved that her and her alone committed this HORRIFIC CRIME!!! I believe just by Pittman's actions after the murder, HE'S GUILTY! GUILTY! GUILTY!!! I wish Carla Hughes could explain why the gun was empty? where is the knife she borrowed? and where was she? With that being said; I do believe that Carla Hughes was definitely involved in the MURDER of Avis Marie Banks!!!!

If Keyon Pittman was on his phone all the time, the tower would show if he was in the area of his house. If he was at the school, the cell phone records would show that he was at the school. Why wasn't this presented in his case?

Keyone controlled all his women. I believe he gave Carla some reason to borrow the gun & knife, then after the murder, he convinced her that she would also be a part of this murder. Kicking in the back door? A women would have broke the glass & unlocked the door. He had access to everything in Carla's house, so use her shoes to kick in the door.Frame up. Cell phone pings only put you in the vicinity of you phone. Did he let someone use it at the gym so it would seem he was there, while he slipped out? He didn't dial 911 ? That tiny bit of blood on him after he"craddled" her body?The last thing that bothered me was, Why was Avis's pants pulled down? I think it was to try and boost the break in theory for Keyone.A woman would not do that !!!She may have education, but love beats that.She's innocent and Keyone has his scapegoat.

I agree with those who suspect Pittman. The stop at Carla's to "drop his groceries" was convenient...as was the pick up. What exactly was that time frame and would he have had the opportunity to get and return the gun, etc.?
The way in which he dealt with women indicates a basic insensitivity and inability to form the deep commitment necessary to maintain a singular relationship. This may give jurors pause to consider the doubt placed by the defense.

As other people have pointed out. Dennis Raider did not "look like a killer, nor did Ted Bundy. and the list goes on.
The point being you "can not judge a book by it's cover". I believe the defense is counting on the fact she does not look like a "typical killer" and is well educated Also,.everyone has a breaking point and under the right circumstances we can be pushed to do uncharacteristic deeds. I am 5 1/2 months pregnant and I can not even begin to fathom what she went though and what she was thinking as she was trying to protect herself and her son. I believe she is guilty and deserves to die. due to a total disregard for human life.
The defense is doing the only thing they can by pointing the finger at someone else.

Is it possible that she is hiding the fact that she borrowed the gun/knife for him to kill his wife and then returned it? Maybe he is telling her when this is over they will be together. Sick yes. But possible?

This is a passion of crime she commit the murder carla borrowed the knife and gun from her cousin.There was blood found on her shoes. I beleive thats enough to convict carla hughes the prosecution have strong evidence against the defendent.

Mr. Pittman committed this crime..He wore those shoes, and tried to set up Carla Hughes, she's to scared to admit it but she knows that he committed the crime. SHe shouldn't have to go to jail over him. He's a coward.

The only verdict I believe the jury can come back with is not guilty or deadlock. The defense has raised reasonable doubt. I am not sure if the two were in this together, but all the circumstantial evidence links them both in some way to this crime. In any case, he should not be able to walk away. There are more questions on both their parts that need to be answered.

margaret

Did they ever check for gun powder residue on her steering wheel/car or her clothes???

I do believe that Carla and Pittman both are involved in this crime and both should be on trial

I just can't see this woman commiting this type of crime. Have they looked at his other girl friends? Both of these women had to much to live for to let a man like that he ruined their lives. Women wake up!!!!!

If you and the world believe everything that Pittman say, then that goes to proof that there is no justice in America. Pittman murdered his wife becasue she had theatened to leave because she found out about his affair. Who else could tell this story, none other than the murdered woman. Carla is innocent of this crime because; One-She is not capable of breaking a door out of the frame. Two-When she returned the gun what happened to the other bullets that is gun had. Why would she lose her career she worked so hard for, for a man?

My thoughts are, she thought of this man as a sexual partner. When we as black women say" this is my furture husband" this means nothing to use it is to make the man feel proud of what he has accomplished. To make him have the big head. She had no motive. She had just what she wanted. She had Pittman when she wanted him and that was all she was after. She knew he was going to be married and she was playing along with this man game. She liked his sex!!!!! bottom line. But not that well to murder someone. He is not the good looking type of man to where she is intrigued by him. She could have any man she wanted. Being a professional.

I really feel like Pittman is guilty, I think he tried to set Ms. Hughes up. I hope justice is served.

Did anyone ever think that when you go target to target practice they they sell bullets there???? I buy my bullets there each time I go.
Did anyone ever confirm that she was actually at the target range? Were there cameras or a sign in sheet?

I am no attorney. However, the defense team has not made me feel that the defendent is innocent. but they have opened the doors that the womanizer may be more involved in this case than he takes credit for.

Haven't been watching this trial very long but from what I've heard in closing arguments and re-caps I feel Carla Hughes should be found not guilty by reasonable doubt. In one instance, Carla is a teacher and how would she know what time and when Avis got home and her schedule unless Pittman told her, teachers really have busy schedules even when school is over..their day doesn't end when students leave the school. I wouldn't think they would share all that during their time together. I would think it would be possible be Mr. Pittman who committed the murder, he knew Avis' schedule, he had access to Carla's home, he also could wear the same size shoe as Carla which I feel is just weird. He has continued on with his life while Carla waited her fate for three years for a crime I feel she didn't commit.

I don't think that the case has been properly proven.I have been following this trial since day 1 and I haven't seen her no remorse whatsoever about the murder,and I believe she hasn't shown known,because she didn't do it.I believe that Ridgeland PD needs to look outside the box.They felt like they had a solid case,simpley because she was having an affair with Keyon.I believe he knows more then what he's saying,because he stayed his tail at home calling other women instead of trying to get Avis and the unborn baby some medical attention,and instead of using his own phone,a phone that was in his hand,he ran across the street to a neighbors house.He committed purjery on the stand.He has told a lot of lies in this case and he should have some kind of charges brought against him, because it's so many things still missing from the case.I believe she's innocent and should be let go.She has sufferred national embarrassment for this case.I hope the jury doesn't find her guilt,because if the public sees all the missing facts,then they should too.

It surprises me that so many of the commentators (attorneys) continue to comment as to the appearance of the defendant as a facor "She doesn't look like a murdered." It reminds me of how people in small town communities say "you don't expect that kind of thing to happen here." What does a murderer look like. This kind of thing reminds me of profiling. Anyone is capable of murder and horrific crimes can happen anywhere. It comes down to the evidence. No one has put the gun in Keyon Pittmans' hand and if they did, then how did it back to the defendant's home and then returned to the cousin?

Alright everyone knows they found the shoes with the blood in Ms. Hughe's closet, but wheres the clothes worn during the murder? You think if Carla Hughes is the killer then why would she get rid of her bloody clothes, why did she keep the shoes? I think Keyon Pittman committed the murder, discarded his bloody clothes, and then put the shoes back in her closet in an effort to frame Ms. Hughes

It is quite sad this man has manipulated these women to point of rage. However, the gun evidence is pretty solid. I think she's guilty

If there is no ballistics report...there is no evidence
If there is no bloody pant that he knelt in, there is no evidence
If there is gun powder residue on his hands...He killed her.

If he didn't kill her physically, he did through emaotionally twisting Carla's thoughts.

Womanizer...marries a year later...wow.

The State is ridiculous.

I love Court TV

After reading all the comments, I am of the opinion that there is too much doubt and too many questions left unanswered.
Hung Jury or Not guilty.

Shame on that police dept and the detectives for not collecting proper evidence.
(gun powder on Keyons clothes/Carla's hands, clothes)

This girl did it. Scott Petersen did it. Jealousy and passion and sex are very driven entities by themselves. Will she get away with it. I'm 97% sure. ,because of her shining history. She put a nail in her coffin for me when she said it was soley her decision (not her attourney's) to testify and answer pertinent questions in her own defense. The prosecutor, or the police did'nt in my opinion ask the right questions either. Where were the witnesses that saw her at target practice?Range? Who only takes 5 bullets to practice?Why did'nt the police ask her, or follow up on this doing questioning? If she had never shot a pistol/gun before prior to her cousin giving her (1) time how to use the gun how to use it. Who could attest to hearing the 5 bullets she said she shot off practicing shots? I study people, in my heart and gut doing her moms testimony in court, her mom knows her daughters' hand did this. Carla let all that hostility, build up inside her and she just snapped. I would have loved to have had a profiler give her view on whether this crime had been committed by Carla Female or Keyon Male.

the defense in this case has raised reasonable doubt that it could have very well been pittman who did the killing he knew where both women where and the lifestyles they lead. He also parked his car in the driveway every night except this particular night. He also had keys to both homes and why would a woman of her intelligence kill a woman after slashing her and shooting her put her shoes back in the closet as if nothing happened. The police found no blood or gsr on the woman's clothing indicating that there was no crime committed. Her only crime she committed was the fact that she fell in love with a disgusting man who doesn't respect woman at all!

I honestly feel that if any one should have suffered, it should have been quadrule timing Mr. Pittman, not Avis and Carla!

NO the state has NOT proven their case.
Poor evidence collection
Did not confirm or shoot down "gun range" alibi
Detectives need to investigate further Keyons alibi and but heat on some people.

having lived in that neighborhood 20 years, there are a dozen kids outside playing from 4p to 9p. For Carla hughs to get to the house,she would have had to climb a 6 foot privacy fence from the back or a side cul-de-sac. nancy memphis TN

After watching this trial from the opening statments all the way down to the closing arguments on both ends prosecution and defense. I observed the body language and emotions of the mister and mistress in this case and the mistress Ms. Hughes showed a quiet but genuine hurt and the mister Mr. Pittman really looked like a cartoon character the way the prosecution presented him. Its many questions left not answered the prosecution or defense never spoke on the the other murder weapon in this case the knife. The prosecution seems as if their just trying to get a win and pushing aside the actual facts in the case. Let's not lose 3 life's in this case the defense really did a good job in painting the picture of her innocence. In this case I feel there's more to it then meets the eye am I saying "Cover Up". That's for you the public to decide.

It seems obvious to me that both of them are involved in the murder. They both seem to be hiding an awful lot!

What I think we have here is a defense that did a great job and a prosecution that did not do there homework. My regrets go out to Avis Banks and her family,But there has been a women sittin in jail for three years for a crime that they can not prove beyond resonable doubt." set her free"

Jami....

I believe that Ms. Hughes and Mr. Pittman were both involved in the murder of Ms. Banks. Ms. Hughes has to be connected because she was the one who got the gun and knife from her cousin. The gun was proven to be the weapon that killed Ms. Banks but I don't recall if the knife was found and determined to be the one used in this brutal murder. I believe that Mr. Pittman did the shooting and Ms. Hughes did the cutting. Since Ms. Hughes is the one on trial for the murder, based on the fact that she got the weapon, if she did not pull the trigger, then she is guilty by giving the gun to Mr. Pittman. If she is found guilty, I believe that she will roll on Mr. Pittman.

I would like to know if it was verified that Carla was at the shooting range.And if so the time and date that she was there.

This is so disturbing for me as a resident of Madison County MS. I have had an uneasy feeling about Pittman ever since the initial coverage back in 2006 and I have to worry about my local authorities if they have not seen and heard the things that have been so obvious to us as the by standers throughout the last three years. Why have they built everything on the man most people here found most suspicious from the beginning. The man that displayed irresponsible, dishonest, if not abhorant behavior day by day. We laughed at his crazy story back in 2006 and would not have ever dreamed it would be Carla instead of him on trial here today. And nobody has presented ANYTHING to change my oppinion of him. It does not take a rocket scientist to figure out why he moved out of state.....he has no support here...we have never trusted him or his story. People have come forward on many levels to support the victims and defense, as well as Keyon. But isn't it funny how Keyon had a romantic relationship with everyone that has come forward other than his assistant coach who is a man. If he does not end up on trial I sure hope he stays out of MS. I don't want him in my town. And I will remember this case the next time we elect District attourney's in this county .

For the life of me I cannot understand why Keyon Pittman is walking about freely while the woman he set up to take the fall is on trial for her life. Just a little common sense folks! HELLO???

There is so much inconclusive evidence that the jury can't possibly convict her. They have to be without a doubt positive that she did it but everything seems too sketchy to do so. Keyon seems to be more gulity than an innocent bystander in this case. It makes me wonder how close the Mississippi Police investogates this double murder.

Yes, we Southerners are polite...almost to a fault!

Anyway....I believe Ms. Hughes is guilty, but if I were a juror I would not feel it had been proven beyond a reasonable doubt.

Susan....Alabama

The prosecution has not proven the case beyond a reasonable doubt. Prosecution's failure to do a thorough investigation in collecting fingerprint evidence shows a rush to judgement on their part. And for the prosecution to base their case on the eyewitness testimony of Keon Pittman causes me to doubt their efforts in finding the real killer.

who hired these police officer in mississippi where as they did not test both pittman and hughes for gsr to the best of there ability?? no one in the case did their job. i feel that hughes should have got on the stand and pleaded her case.. point blank. she borrowed a loaded gun she needed to explain that as well as so many other thing.

What happened to the knife during all this? I hear so much about the gun but nothing about the knife. In my opinion Carla Hughes is innocent and they should focus on Pittman.

Mr Pittman did not wear his wedding ring on the wittness stand. I wonder if he was told not to wear it. Why would he not marry the woman that was carrying his child after dating for years and buying a house. He was able to overcome grief and gget married within a year of Ms. Banks death.

I've been watching this trial from the beginning. I don't think that the State has presented a case of reasonable doubt. I don't think that the evidence points to the defendant Carla Hughes. I think in fact that the evidence points to the deceased finacee' Kenyon Pittman. The state says that Mr. Pittman isn't smart enough to put something together like this but this is a witness for them. I wondering for someone who claims found her on the ground why wasn't his shoes full of blood even his clothing wasn't drenched in blood. The man is a womanizer that used Carla feelings that she had for him and set her up. He had the means and motive to do this. He was the man focus of the investigation. With the juror deliberating this long I hope and pray that it is in carla favor. Although alot of families has been effected by this I don't think Carla committed the crime at hand.

At first I thought that she was guilty. But after watching and listen to the case... I see that there is no way she is guilty. The prosecutor left so many question unaswered. Why is it that a year after he is married that had to mean either he fall in love quick or he had three women at one time.I am very much so in agreement with the defence lawyer when he say Mr. Pittman can not stand for a nice looking to past him by. Everyone say she had to do it but Mr. Pittman stated on his own behave that they wear the same size shoes. He could have got the shoes and then put them back because he had his own key. As smart as she is why would she kill her in those shoes and then put them in her own closet instead of getting ride of them. I just hope that the jury find her not guilty because she didnt do it. MR.PITTMAN IS THE GUILTY PERSON IN THIS CASE.....

this is a question i would like to no short and sweet. is there enough evidence to convict her for the death penalty i dont think so

I clearly can NOT understand "the Keyon did it because he is a cheater theory". If Keyon had killed his fiance, he would not have shot her in thigh... miss... hit the wall ... in the hip ...then cut her.... or whatever the wounds indicate. If he wanted to shoot her he could have walked right up on her with one shot or stab her one time. The shooter seems to not have been a good shot and the victim seems to have been fleeing.

In a premeditated situation, Keyon could have been much more precise.

What was Keyon's motive? His fiancee either did not mind the other women or was totally oblivious to it. They were not married, he could have broken the engagement....

If the jury is forming thier opinion solely on the fact that Carla is cute, educated, comes from a good family and behaves well at the defense table ,she will walk. Your bloggers and commentators seems to think that should earn an acquittal.

Are you sure Johnnie Walls is not Johnnie Cochran?

I think that it's a shame that all the evidence points to Keyon and the wrong person is being put on trial. I don't know about you but I don't borrows girl's shoes.

I think that Hughes and Pittman conspired together in the killing od Banks, however I do not believe the state has proven their case beyond a reasonable doubt, and thats a shame for the victim and her family.

Did I hear that Pittman married someone other than Carla after the investigation began?

He had his cake and was eating it too. He was happy. HE was a cheater not a killer.He had no reason to kill her in such a brutal fashion and just stand there knowing he would be a prime suspect. Why didn't he doctor the scene and make it look like a murder/robery ? This defendant should of took the stand, and told her side of the story. She should of got on that stand and fought for her life. This way she could of showed emotion, and let the jury see what kind of person she is firsthand.

There is a lot of talk about how Keyon responded, to his fiancee's death, where is it written on how to handle such a discovery.

Keyon Pittman is a liar and a cheater who wanted to have everything he desired, but that doesn't make him a murderer. People are comparing him to Scott Peterson, but let us not forget that good, persistent detective work is what ultimately convicted Peterson, not simply the fact that he was a cheater. The defense, though it put together a good case, just did not convince me that Pittman wanted Ms. Banks dead. If he didn't want her, he probably would have just walked away. Men do it all the time and he seems to fit the bill had that been the case. Plus, how can you dispute the cell phone records? According to implications made by Senator Walls, perhaps the cell phone company was in cahoots with Mr. Pittman as he performed the acts of Superman to commit this horrible crime.

I can't see how a jury could come back with a not guilty verdict. 2 + 2 = 4. There are other ways in which a person can arrive at 4, but if 2 is constantly in the picture every time a piece of evidence is found or information is uncovered then the only way to arrive at 4 is with 2. Everything points to Carla. I'm not taking up for the creep she was having the affair with, but everyone seems to be forgetting that she was involved with someone whom she knew was engaged with a baby on the way. Carla was not a victim. The victim was killed along with her baby. If I were on the jury, my vote is Carla is guilty.

Just wondering why did he take his grocery to his girlfriends house instead of home. Why not wait until he left practice.? Something is wrong I think hes involved . Then he gets home, see his pregnant girlfriend and run next door for a alibi before 911 was called. If Carla knows something she better sing like never before or fall alone.

The state simply hasn't done it's job here! When they chose not to investigate Pittman fully, they gave the defense the resonable doubt they needed! Odd that they would test Hughes clothes for gunshot residue, and not test Pittman's.

I feel that Keyoun murdered Avis! He was in a love triangle but wasn't in love with either of these women. He was infact probably involved with his now wife. They were married too soon. I think he staged the whole thing because he had to get rid of two women that were deeply in love with him in order to be with the one woman he loved and that was his now wife. It was to much of a hassel to leave Avis and the baby in his life along with this new found love. His tears were fake and he lack true emotions towards the whole inncident so I think he killed Avis and framed Carla to get them both out of his life. He knew that everyone would blame Carla for Avis death because the relationship was no secrect to the public but only to Avis Banks!!! He in a sense killed two birds with one stone!

From looking at the evidence, I think Pittman and Hughes should be charged with the murder of Banks. She got the murder weapons and he did the deed. Pittman's acting on the stand would be better put to use in jail.

I can't imagine serving three years in prison and having been given the opportunity to set the record straight with the TRUTH, not taking advantage of the witness stand and letting the whole world know that I am book smart, have the degrees to show it, but not so smart in the choices I've made in life. I would want to declare my innocence in this murder trial if it's the last thing I do, if not for my own sake for the sake of my child who needs his mother at home to raise him. If Hughes had an accomplice Now was her chance to let it all out and not take the full blame. " if she's so innocent of it all according to her defense team, why isn't she telling who she gave the gun to that did the shooting that coincidently landed the bullets in her lovers garage? was it pittman?

I am totally convinced that Keyon Pittman is the guilty party in this case. Carla Hughes had too much going for her. I agree with Sen. Walls, he is a walking devil, who is about to get away with murder.
I would also like to know more about the door that was forcibly opened.

The more I see and hear, the more I believe Carla is not guilty. Keon, the player, etc. could have done it just as easily. I think Carla was smart not to get on the stand. reasonable doubt for sure.

PASSION KILLING!!! If Pittman committed this murder I don't see the intent of the over kill by him. She was not cheating on him, he was cheating on her. His lover had all the markings of a passion killer. She was outrage at her rival, to the extent of -- MUTILATING HER FACE- by stabbing her in the face, this is most unusual. She resented her, her existence and her appearance, thus the stabbing of her in the face, if there were 15 bullets in the gun I bet all 15 would have been fired. It was clearly a case of overkill due to the rage involved.

keyon pittman has all the motive in the world to pull it off. now hw is married a year after the death of avis banks and the unborn child. he knew from the get go that his intentions was to use carla to get rid of avis ...it clarly shows he sit her up. the shoes is the key.. what man wears a woman shoes while dating them, as well as why did he even call carla to come over once her body was discovered. detectives mess up all the time..they are human. they need to take another look at mr. pittman....he has to much cake and avis was going to mess it all up due to the fact shes pregnant and to make things look only rite t her parents was to ask her for marriage. and once again he moves to detriot and marries..open your eyes...its not always the lover that murders...

To my knowledge during this trial coverage I have not heard any of the statistics related to the murder rate increasing dramatically when a woman becomes pregnant. When Scott Peterson was on trial this factual info was talked about ad nauseum. Mr. Pittman did have a powerful motive to commit this crime...he was going to have to play the role of a father soon and I would bet money he had no intention of doing same. Ms. Banks became the enemy to him. If Ms. Hughes is guilty of anything it is letting herself get involved with such a total loser.

If this lady is found not guilty.What cab she do with the remained of her life? go back to teaching?Or what? Thanks

In my opinion I believe that Pitman may have committed this crime himself or had someone do it for him.

This person has married someone else within a year and has moved on with his life. No tears on the stand. Wow.

Now, how long has he had this other woman that he married?
It would have had to be during the time that he was engage to the other woman and messing with Carla.

So, in my opinion he killed three stones at one time by killing Avis his finacee', his unborn child, and framing Carla.

R. White of Philadelphia, PA.

I am so very angry with the fact that Keyon Pittman was not investigated, In myopinion, Carla Hughes has been falsely charged, and I truly believe with all the testimony that he could have set Carla up, I believe in her innocence. I pray for her, her family, as well as Avis' family.

The question by the jury and the length of the deliberation at this point....leads to NOT GUILTY in my opinion.

They are struggling to find evidence to convict her, and they just cant make the LEAP with the circumstantial evidence.

It's obvious that Keyon didn't love any of these women and had no respect for them. How do you get rid of all issues with Avis and Carla? You kill one and frame the other one. Why would a smart woman like Carla put her blood stained shoes back in the shoe box in her closet and return the gun when asked? At some time, I think Carla mentioned to Keyon her fear for needing a gun and probably told him of borrowing both a gun and knife. Keyon probably knew she had these items and already knew her shoes would fit him. It was the perfect opportunity to set Carla up. That is why I believe both weapons were used. That information comes straight back to Carla. My biggest question would be, did Keyon have access to Carla's house or these items prior to the murders?

If the defense wants to point the finger at Pittman, then why did they point out that the "basketball mom" left practice at the same time as Pittman, implying yet another lover of Pittman. Also, if Pittman is guilty because noone saw him, then why is Hughes NOT guilty because no one saw her. The defense attorney confused me. I was leaning towards not-guilty until the defense presented its case.

I believe Carla Hughes is guilty. Based on the evidence of the gun, the knife and the cell towers. In circumstantial evidence trials, I believe it is easy to create so called "reasonable doubt". In this premeditated murder case there are only two eyewitnesses, and one of them is dead. I hope the jury sees through the smoke screen and comes back with justice for Ms. Banks and her unborn baby. Jealousy is a very strong emotion. The brutality of the crime shows it was committed by someone filled with hatred for Ms. Banks and her unborn child. Mr. Pittman was a cheating scum, but Carla got involved with him knowing he had a pregnant fiance. Same on her! Killers come in all shapes, sizes and backgrounds. I believe an innocent person would take the stand to plead for their life. God be with the Banks family.

I wonder how is it that the D.A. could only pinpoint Ms. Hughes for the crime when Pittman called his other jumpoff at the time? Is that Pittman and Hughes fell off or is it that he needed to pin it on someone so he chose Hughes. Whatever the case may be, the Banks family deserves to know the truth and I think that Pittman, Hughes and Bridgette (the other jumpoff) knows what happened to Ms. Banks and her unborn child.

"By the skin of her teeth she will be found INNOCENT on the current charges BUT best believe Carla Hughes will be testifying AGAINST that "slick" Kenyon Pittman!!! I would not be shocked if the so-called "basketball mom" was an accomplice also. AND What was so pressing that KP could not drop his assistant coach OR his basketball player off at home?

This case is similar to the murder of an North Carolina Central University student Denita Smith in Jan 2007. She became a victim when her fiancee exstranged lover gunned her down while she was exiting her campus apartment. Mr.Pittman is a man who is insecure and selfish. He manipulates other women to make himself feel better.

Why wasn't the cousin asked by the prosecution or the defence,"If you asked for the gun back, why didn't you also ask for the knife back?" If Carla returned a gun that was proven be the murder weapon what did she do with the KNIFE?

The defendant had the gun used (and a knife) before the murder was commited and she had them after the murder was commited... It stands to reason that with no evidence or testamony that some one else had them... she must have used them. Where are the shell casings? Where is the knife? The blood on her shoes... How much more do you need?

Simple is that. We all know Ms Hughes not guilty. stop waste the tax spare on this case .Go after the real killer as we know is Mr Pittman?
Thank you

This is about the shoes...Isn't there a way to test who was wearing the shoe when the bloody shoe print was left. I ask because people all walk differently and weigh differently...couldn't they have used pig blood and had both Hughes and Pitman give shoe impressions to then compare to the one left at the scene. While the wear and thread patterns on the sole would be consisted with both having worn the shoes previously. The impression could only point the one who was actually wearing them by weight and their personal walking style.

I have not followed this case religiously, however, I believe the defense has more than proven their case of innocence for Ms. Hughes. My thoughts and prayers go not only to her, but to her family who must be in agony having to endure such turmoil. Just watching Ms. Hughes would convince me of her innocence. She has no reason to show remorse but has every reason to show the disgust and disbelief in her facial expressions. I believe her decision not to testify will only nail the verdict of guilt on Keyon Pittman when the jury pronounces Ms. Hughes innocence and the prosecution focuses their attention on whom I believe is guilty of this horrible double homicide; Keyon Pittman. His day in court as the rightfully accused is yet to come!

I believe there is too much reasonable doubt in this trial for the jurors to convict Ms. Hughes.

Could the reason be for Hughes not taking the stand be because her story wouldn't hold under cross examination?

I agree! You have to look beyond the appearance of an individual. However, I feel the detectives should have looked into Keyon before rulling him out as a suspect and charging Carla with the crime because they both had motive. Carla, they say wanted what Avis had and keyon didn't want Avis, the baby or the future they were suppose to have.

I'm surprised the prosecutor didn't focus on or ask more detailed questions about the knife and the shooting range Carla Hughes allegedly attended.

I think Carla Hughes is guilty of murder. I believe that she didnt act alone. Keyon help her kill his fiance. Watching Keyon on the stand is funny, he keeps on making himself cry he isnt a good actor at all. Both Carla and Keyon deserve to be in jail, for taking Avis away from her loved ones

I haven't followed the trial since the beginning but do have enough information to believe that Carla Hughes, while she may not be guilty of murder, is certainly guilty of conspiracy to commit murder and guilty of accessory to murder. There are too many facts that place her at the scene and securing the murder weapons. Her motive was clear and, certainly passion will cause us to do extreme things. Pittman is certainly NOT innocent in this case and should be arrested and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. I believe he left practice, went to Hughes' house, picked up the weapons and commited the crime. I think the "shoes" was an afterthought while at Hughes' house and he thought he could implicate her, and her alone, and thus pretend that he was as much a victim as his "beloved" fiance...he with no tears.

Cathy in Indy

I believe the prosecutor put on a good case given the evidence. She borrowed the gun and knife 3 days prior to the murder and returned 2 days after the murder. It was her shoe print in blood and she told the police that she didnt have a gun. Kenyon Pittman might have convinced her to do this, but if thats the case she is still as guilty. It is all so tragic that a young woman and her unborn child died in such a brutal fashion, and it was so unnecessary.

carla was put on a pestile coming up she was spoil and use to having what she want she had plenty book sense,but no common sense to relize keyon was manipulating her into murder she premattated it all guilty !!!

I don't believe commited this murder. There is no evidence that she even knew or spoke to Avis. She had to have know that Keyon was seeing other women other than herself. What would make her think that he would be faithful and true to her even if Avis was out of the way. The procesuter said that Carla planned and conspired to kill Avis. If she had planned this murder, why would she be stupid enough to take the shoes with blood on them and put them back in her closet. She would have known that Keyon would be a suspect and therefore it might eventually be led to her in some way. Most of us have watched enough TV to know that the first thing you would do is to get rid of all of the evidence including the shoes, your clothing, the gun, and and knief and anything that could be linked to you.

I have reasonable doubt. There are too many inconsistencies regarding what happened. There is circumstanial evidence that ties both Pittman and Hughes to the crime. The fact that Pittman had gun residue on his hands is substantial. The state should have charged both and cut a deal with the first one that wanted to tell the truth.

[I] personaly think that pittman is guilty but for the jury to believe that carla needs to take the stand and tell her side of the story...Carla is just a smart lady that ran into the wrong man...
-DESTINY,TX

Just curious! Has there been any other cases where a female committed a crime of murder and then pulled down the pants of the female victim?
Why did detectives not recover the shoes Mr. Pittman himself said he had been wearing?
Was the timeline brought out as to when the death occured and when Mr. Pittman had discovered the victim? Was it possible that he had went and changed out of bloody clothes (Shoes, ect) and then came back to the scene and discovered the victim?
With such rage shown in the crime itself, how is there no better evidence like DNA and were there any signs of cuts on either suspect?
Resonable doubt....seems from what I have heard...ALL the evidence used could in fact fit either suspect....Yes I am calling Mr. Pittman a viable suspect.
Craig

Re: The Carla Hughes case

"While I am not a fan of Keyon Pittman I have a difficult time believing that he would have wanted Avis or his unborn child dead. He has clearly demonstrated that he is deceitful and I find his behaviour reprehensible. However, Carla Hughes does not fare much better. Here is a bright and educated woman having an ongoing affair with a man who's fiance was five months pregnant. I find that behaviour reprehensible as well. I am bothered that Carla Hughes did not get on the stand to tell her side of the story. This was a viscious viscious and gruesome murder and I feel that she had the greater motive to want Avis and her unborn child out of the picture. I agree with an email that was just posted that he was quite happy to have his cake and eat it too. I don't believe this makes him a murderer."

I did not follow the trial from the beginning, but I did hear closing statements. In my opinion there are alot of unanswered questions. I believe in going over everthing more than once with a fine tooth comb! Ms Hughs may be educated, I agree. Educated enough to think she would not get caught after acting a fool over this no good man. On the other hand Keyon could have framed her because he did have access to all of the evidence. They could have been in on it together, but if so, why has Ms Hughs not said anything. My point is, there is reasonable doubt!! Someone may get away with murder NOW, but it will catch up with he or she later!!

This was a very brutal murder and it seems to me that this a crime of rage. What could cause a human being to mutilate another? I ask myself that question over and over. Could the unborn child be the cause of rage. Are they sure that this was Mr. Pittman's child? Could he have found out that this was not his child, which caused the rage.

Re:Carla Hughes case....from Julia Reichenbacher.....Ontario/CANADA

I hope justice will be serve for Avis Banks and unborn son. I think this is a tragedy that two innocent life was lost of a cheating ex-fiance, who could not keep his penis in his pant. Also, one of his many, many, mistresses who conspire to get rid of her and the baby. I do believe that Keyon Pittman had much to do with Avis murder and both him and Carla Hughes should have both been charge with her murder. It will be very interesting to see how the jury will decide? hmmm.

reasonable doubt, reasonable doubt , reasonable doubt .
Perhaps it would have been helpful to the prosecution to charge Mr. Pittman as well.

I firmly believe that no one other than Keyon killed this woman and his unborn child. Carla Hughes is nothing more than a fall guy for this creep. Looking at him giving testimony I could tell right away when he was lying because of the blinking of his eyes. I hope this jury looks at the case presented and come back with a not guilty verdict. The prosecution had to prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that Carla was the killer and they did not prove this. Why did the police not test Keyon's clothes for gun powder? His hands were full of gun powder. I believe he stole the gun and knife from Carla and shot and killed that woman. To find Carla guilty would be a miscarriage of justice.

I live in Greenville, Ms where Ms Hughes is from and I don't think that shes guilty. She may be guilty of making some very bad choices, especially in dealing with Keyon. He should be the one on trial with those fake tears of his. Secondly, why would he need to borrow her shoes? This makes him look very guilty. In my opinion she is innocent, and why would the jury have to ask, why she didn't testify? The jury should have some knowledge about how a trial should go.

I had the opportunity to watch the trial via Tru-Tv. Sort of obvious that Carla has been probably "played" by this dude and for whatever silly reason she has come up with, she tried protecting him and now its a possibility, more likely than not, that she's going to pay the price for not using that intelligence that her forbearers instilled in her. She probably still does not realize that "coach" is a LOSER, just like his coaching skills. She appears (based upon observations only) like a good person, from a good family, not a low-life as this Keyon character has been shown to be. I feel sad for this sister, whether she did it or didn't do it.

I have a question...Is first degree murder the only option the jury have? If the answer is yes...I think I would have a hard time voting to convict. too much reasonable doubt.

We all put on different facades and yes one of Hughs characteristic may be peaceful. But we all have an evil and vindictive side to us. Some of us go as far a bringing harm to others were others dont. Hughs snapped when Keyon refused to meet her needs. Yet, I believe her lover Keyon has pertinent information regarding Avis being murdered. His actions or reactions are not typical of someone who embarks upon something like a murder of a fiance'.

Kymm
CA

I want Carla Hughes to get off. I think Pitman had alot more to do with this then was stated. I have watched this from day one.

What gets me is that they talk about Pittman crying fake tears, What
about Hughes, did she cry at anytime; I would think that after hearing about how Avis Banks got killed and a baby being inside her would have hit her pretty hard being a mom herself. And we also forget that this woman gave this man that she dated for only a short amount of time, she gave him a key to her home??? Way too soon I think!

Jackson Ms.

What about the fact that whomever did this shooting and stabbing was not able to shoot or stab the baby. Does this show some strange type of attachment to the fetus?

you keep saying she looks too good to be a killer! You cant tell a book bye its cover. I feel she is guilty. All the evidence is against her. Sure he is a crud to do what he did, but that doesnt make him guilty

i think all the evidence points to Carla.She should have explained where the bullets went if she was innocent.It seems like she really cared more for her boyfriend than her child.Her biggest problem is the
cell phone records that show her in the area in the area of the murder.People forget that anytime your phone is on it is hitting on cell towers if someone calls you even if you dont answer it.I think the worst is the death of the baby.I also think the defendant comes off like she is better than anyone else.I believe she was blindly in love with that man and believed he was hers so she eliminated her rival.

I think that with everything said, the State hasnt focus on the possibility that there is still a murderer out there in that community. I feel that the edvidence in this case is poor. The state was asking the wrong questions in this case, such as why was there gunshot residue on the witness Mr. Pittman and not on Ms. Huges. I feel that the state avoided all the right questions to ask.

I just wanna know if they ever checked carla car for evidence, And their is just to many unanwsered questions for her to be convicted.

I'm greatly sorry for the Davis and Hughes families. My thought on the matter is that, I think that Mr. Pittman had a part in the murder of Avis. No man I know would use his girlfriend shoes for anything,and that he was the only person with gun powder on his hand. Yes Ms Hughes is a woman that road horses and did other things as well, but that doesn't prove she had the strenght to break down a dead bolt door. Mr. Pittman should be on trial for this murder.

Was it proven that Keyon Pittman was the father of Avis Banks' baby?

The state did not meet the burden of proof in this case. Keyon is a big fat liar, who not only killed his fiance and his unborn child, but who also set up one of his girlfriends to take the fall. Come on people it doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure this out. Beyond a reasonable doubt means there can be no other reasonable alternative. Look at the time line and the actions of Keyon. There are approximately 2 1/2 hours unaccounted for, no call to 911 from him, gunpowder residue on his hands. Please!!!

How long was the defendent and Mr. Pittman in a relationship prior to the victims death? Did the victim and the defendent work in the same elementary school? Did they live in the same area? Has there been any one close to either to substansiate if they ever knew about one another? What made the cousin come forth with the information regarding the gun? Did they think she would have done this for the sake of love?

I think Carla should have stayed out of the pit of despair.Pittman was not worthy of the energy wasted on him.I believe though things are looking mighty dim for Carla.I think Carla should try to get things right with The Almighty God,at the end she must stand before his white throne for judgement to be judge for the deeds done on this earth,. God bless her.

Am I the only one who thinks Pittman took out two birds with one stone? He had plenty of motive and opportunity to kill one and set the other one up to get rid of them both. Did he finally marry the third or do we have to wait for the book?

I think if the house was staged, then it had to be Carla because
the testimony said that the drawers were pulled out first, third, fith
drawer was pulled out and a woman like Carla would be more
likely to do a staged burglary in a orderly fashion more so than
Pittman would. This is just my opinion.

If it was Hughs why was Avis's pants down. It was Pittman.

Sadly, I think instead of guilty, we will see a hung jury!

Re: Carla Hughes case. From: J Reichenbacher, Ontario/CANADA

" I need to add that I have just read many of the emails posted and I too am disturbed and bothered by the fact that I continue to hear about how well educated she was and why would she do this , throw away her life. People are capable of doing things that are out of character under the right circumstances. I absolutely believe this was a crime of passion which points more to Carla. I do not believe in the death penalty."

I believe Carla should be found not guilty. I am not sure I believe she is innocent in the whole matter but I don't believe she killed Avis and the baby. Keyon did not show saddness for the death of the baby at all during the time he faked tears about Avis. Keyon did it but he manipulated Carla to help him but she can't admit that now because she would still go to jail and lose everything.

Why hasn't the issue of "Murder for Hire" been raised. I think Pittman well capable of that.

I was wondering since they said her stomach was exsposed if they checked the clothing she was wearing for DNA i've seen before were skin cells have been left behind on clothing also if someone pulled her clothing down it's possible skin cells or perspiration could have been left behind, also the shoes did they check them for dna to possibly see who was wearing them? I dont believe the prosecution proved it's case they found no evidence at all that Ms. Hughes was ever in that house.

I think she did it.

Why do the defence always use breaking down the process of evidence when that shows more that the defedent is quilty, remember OJ?

Keyon Pittman had it too good, he did not poop in his own nest

Pittman is very suspect and he may not have anything to do with the murder. On the other hand, if he does, he must have so much mind control over Carla. I could not imagine sitting there if he had something to do with this and let him go free. He will be back doing the same thing if he is not already doing it already.

If found guilty I would suggest they file an appeal. There was never any answer as to who broke into Avis Banks home about two months prior to her death. Was the break in ever solved? If not, why not? Too many unanswered questions for me.

I am so confused as to why no one has suggested that both of them are guilty. I believe a possible scenario is that He shot her and Carla stabbed her. Even if that was not the case the television series, 'SNAPPED' showcases a lot of beautiful, well groomed women that kill others over jealousy or love. Carla is involved some how.

I have been watching the case from the beginning and from day one had a difficult time beleiving Carla Hughes was capable of this act. I am unsure of who did this but there is not enough evidence to prove guilt on Hughes. It is absolutely tragic and Pittman should b ashamed of himself. He is a faker, liar and cheat. He didnt deserve Avis and the unborn child. This is so sad and to think Hughes could be put to death for this act, not to mention the time she has had to spend in jail away from her family and life.

There's too much reasonable doubt in this case. There appears to be more evdence and motive to prosectue Keyon Pittman. Even if Miss Hughes is found guilty, this case should have never made it to court. There is absolutely no evidence that Miss hughes was ever at that house.. Yes, she had the gun in her possession. However, Keyon had direct access to that gun.. Keyon is the one who found the body and yet, Keyon, didn't call the police of EMS.

Why isn't Keyon Pittman on trial here? Carla Hughes is not solely responsible for this despicable and horrifying act! Keyon Pittman is up to his neck in this.Sadly I believe that Ms. Hughes and Mr. Pittman concocted this dastardly deed, and Ms hughes supplied the weapon(making her an accessory)and Mr. Pittman is responsible for the final act. You have to remember the police initially suspected him in the first place, and because of his crocodile tears they were some how convinced that he was not involved.

But Ms. Hughes does know more than what she is saying, and for the life of me I dont know why she won't through all caution to the wind and defend herself

The little girl on the stand (keyon Pittman) certainly did not waste anytime defending himself

Why did Mr. Pittman leave the country , I know to get away his troubles when you do a crime you don't stick around. You put it on some else and try to get away. God bless the women who put their trust in a crook.

My prayers are with Carla...I know from the facts that were presented she can not and will not be found guilty...Carla really needs to take the stand and answer a few questions...Although her chump of a boyfriend was a womanizer he could have very easily wore her shoes commit the crime plant the evidence and drive back to basketball practice. He had more to gain from the death than she did. All she would have ended up with is a deadbeat absent father that still slept around with the women in his immediate circle. He was to dumb to date outside of the school system...What a jerk. I think he should be on trail at least as a co-defendant.

I believe Carla is guilty , cause she borrowed her cousin's gun and she was the one returned it 3 days later without the 5 bullets in the gun, Carla needed to get on the stand and explain alot of un answered questions, I believe..............

The fact the Kenyon Pittman could wear Ms. Hughes shoes is reasonalbe doubt because these shoes were the ones used in this murder. The fact that all these women were weak for him is reasonable doubt as well. His alibi witness was a weak woman on the side. C'mon now that's not a reliable witness. I think he played the hell out of MS. Hughes as she knows it. She would have been found guilty as an accomplice to murder because she helped him by getting the gun. But know one can say which one of these two committed this horrible murder.

It all comes to the conclusion that someone killed this woman.It is easier to believe the other woman did it. But he had more reason to kill her, than the other woman. He was a player and he played both women, and he got caught, He is not the familt type person, and he was in a situation that he be a family guy. I believe he did it Not Carla Hughes.

I've been knowing Carla a long time and I think the defense did a good job defending her because of the fact that since I've been knowing her (Carla) she has not been a violent person more of a peace maker never confronted anyone and would never hurt a fly. My assumption is I don't think she was capable of doing such a brutal act to anyone let alone a pregnant woman.

Guilty. Use your heads.

If the gun and knife that Carla Hughes borrowed were the murder weapons and she and Keyon Pittman planned the murder together isn't she still guilty, even if Pittman actually killed Avis Banks? I agree that Pittman looks bad and might even have played a role, but that doesn't mean that Hughes still isn't guilty. The proof is overwhelming that she is involved, if not the killer. She borrows the gun that was used in the murder. Five bullets were in the gun, five bullets were fired at the scene, an empty gun was returned. A knife was used in the murder, she borrowed a knife, the knife was not returned.
Does it matter if the jury believes that Pittman is ALSO guilty? Isn't this trial about Carla's guilt?

everyone wants to put the blame on pittman. but in my opinion i don't think pittman was involved in any way. yes, he was a womanizer and yes, that was wrong for him to cheat on his fiancee but i really believe carla committed the murder by herself. you can see it in her eyes the way she sits so nonchalant in the courtroom and the look she has on her face is i am gonna get away with murder. you can see she is a pure evil person and a spoiled brat used to having everything her way and getting what she want and that was the case here. want keyon but couldn't have him like she wanted so get fiancee out the way and i can have him all to myself. carla is the murderer and she should get the death penalty. if she gets off i will really have no more faith in the justice system. thjis woman is a cold blooded killer. being a teacher and well dressed means nothing to me. GUILTY! GUILTY! GUILTY!

I came in on this case in the middle of its trial, and I must say the the defense attorney in this case is to me better then Matlock or equal. Any way what human that have found a close person to him or herself dead would not call 911 in a hurry. I mean this guy has a cell phone in his hand and did not use it . Instead he goes to the neighbors for help.

Ok here is the reason. He did not no how to sound like he was a victum over the phone. He killed this young lady and he knows it and there is a few other people no about this situation. Hughes is innocent

I don't think Carla Hughes had anything to do with the murder
of Avis Banks, I think That Pittman got cold feet, that he didn't want
to be a Dad so he killed Avis and framed Carla,

He should of just told Avis , that he didn't want to be with her

if he did he wouldn't of chased all kinds of women.

he is a cheater and women should stay away from him,

who says he won't get tired of his new wife and try to get rid of her too.
he used Carla and he needs to be made to pay not her,
she has a young child who needs their mother.

Neither side proved their case. They both left so many questions unanswered...what was the journey of the bloody shoes, could he have borrowed the gun and then replaced it? But, the biggest nail in Carla's coffin was her decision not to go on the witness stand. And, she lied about so many things along the way.

I personally think she's guilty, and do not agree with the sentiment that she doesn't look like a killer. That's absurd. Jealousy and obsessive love are two of the biggest motivators for murder. I think he manipulated her and had a part in framing her, but I think the savagery commited on Avis is more like a jealous lover than a wimpy, weak, womanizer.

And, when did a sterling academic record make one less apt to kill. Watch Masterpiece Mystery, where, currently in the Colin Dexter series the murders, in abundance take place at Oxford by Oxford Dons, etc.

The verdict is in, Guilty on all counts.......

*police had poor evidence for the case
*both prosecutor and defense had good closing remarks
*however, the fact of the matter is, there are doubts and it is possibly Keyon or someone else that could have murdered Ms. Banks
*which proves Ms. Hughes is not guilty beyond a reasonable doubt

VERY GOOD TRIAL ! HATS OFF !

What are the people in Mississippi thinking??????????? THE MAN DID IT!!!!!

This was a difficult trial; however, I feel that justice was indeed served.

I think that she is guilty, Yes, the boyfriend is a poor excuse for a man, but Hughes knew that upon getting involved with him it took two to have an affair so when you call him names and judge his character for cheating,the same should apply to her, if anything they did it together, and she doesnt look innocent she looks worried about being found guilty

GUILTY !!!! SO SAY WE ALL !!! Bye Bye Carla.

Wow they just found her guilty.. A part of me is surprised and another part is not. I really felt as if there were a lot of questions that the prosecution didn't answer; that should have been answered before I could convict someone of Capitol Murder. Just too many "what ifs"

She should have taken the stand!

This is my 1st post and I just had to say that I know in my heart Carla Hughs commited the murder. But, her lawyers make me doubt myself. They were so good, they make me almost forget about the gun!

I just read that the verdict is guilty, which doesn't surprise me.

I think Ms. Hughes would have had a better chance at a not guilty verdict if she had picked more effective counsel.

There is a verdict,,,,What is it?

every one has been talking about the immoral behavior of Mr. Pittman and I have to agree but at the same time I have to believe that Mrs. hughes became aware of his engagement to the victim Mrs. Banks and enjoyed her role as homewrecker. I wonder how she will enjoy her role as inmate for the rest of her very possibly short life????

verdict was reached as of 3pm supposed to be posted here. Any ONEknow results ?

IT'S SAD THAT SHE HAS BEEN FOUND GUILTY, I TRULY BELIEVE THAT PITTMAN HAD PART IN THIS. GOD BLESS HER AND HER SON

I think that Carla Hughes Was setup by Pitman and didnot see what he was doing because she was so madly in love with him. I believe from his testimony that he is guilty of murder.

I have had the feeling from the beginning of this trial that Ms. Hughes was involved in the planning stages of this murder, and procured the gun and knife for Mr. Pittman. Perhaps they thought Ms. Hughes wouldn't be convicted, or would be convicted of lesser charges, and she decided to take her chances with the legal system in order to protect Pittman. This sort of twisted logic and silence happens often in cases like these. If they decide to bring charges against Pittman (and, I believe they should), I wouldn't be surprised to see Ms. Hughes up there testifying against him at some point in time.

I am a realist. This chick had bloody shoes, borrowed a knife and a gun that ended up being the murder weapon, I mean, please, you liberals need to grow up. If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, it is probably a duck. We Iowans see it like it is.

She has been found guilty folks. I found it strange that her mother had no emotion..at least seen...not a tear in sight. Whats up with that.

I believe Pittman was involved along with Carla Banks, I believe Pittman brought Carla to that house to kill Avis and some how got her out when he left the gym. I belive he also said he said he was never in Carla's guest bedroom where Carla's mother said she first met him at. He LIED.

It is the job of a Atty to raise doubt. Once they do, the guilty goes free. It is a shame that this poor woman and this child will never have a life. Carla borrowed the gun and knife for protection? For what? If she was that afraid why did she borrow the gun and knife on Sunday and return it the following Friday? Was the danger over???? I don't think so. If he did this murder, he would have just shot her. But a woman will over kill and destroy another womans beauty. The victum had what she wanted. Her man, a home, a child. She was not going to share her life with this woman or child. Yes Carla will go free. If she was not guilty and faced death, she would have sang loud and clear. She did not take the stand because she was afraid she would hang herself and she would have. She is guilty and she will go free. This is the saddest case I have ever witnessed. Once they say NOT GUILTY she can go out and shout to the world that she did it and they can't do a thing about it. Her Attys are helping a murderer go free. They knew what they were doing by putting the thought that someone else did it. Look at OJ. He was found not guilty and then he admitted he did it. I am sick to death of playing games of evidence. I do think both should be tried and convicted. But even if he went to trial he would walk to. So much for our justice.

I think they both killed Avis and planned to point the finger at one another just enough that neither would be convicted with Carla believing they would be together once its all over...I think they are both evil, Carla murdered a inocent BABY and his inocent mother...what if a evil woman had murdered her while she was pregnant with her child? She wouldn't have liked that very much now would she??? I hope Carla gets death and then I hope they get him too. an eye for an eye!!!!!

I think that the jurors will do the right thing. This case does not show that she did it but it does show that she did know about the murder of Ms. Banks. There is no way in the world that while the police is interviewing him that he would be texting Carla. It just shows that he did kill Ms. Banks. He should have been so upset that Ms. Banks and his son was gone that Carla should have been that last person on his mind. Remember he said that he did not plan on being with Carla so why text her if he knows that Carla so called wanted more from him. He did it to tell her that he was free and he did not want her to move on with the pro ball player.

First off. Can you say "DESPARATE" you mean to tell me Carla Hughes was that hard up for somebody that she had to settle for a piece of a man. Where's the dignity and morals. She's supposed to be intelligent, but any dummy knows 'you play with fire you get burned' . Let this be a lesson learned if a man is someone else's man then he is not on the market anyway so you kinda get what you deserve when what's done in the dark comes to light.

At first I thought hughes did it until I heard the closing arguments the prosecutors did not make a good case at all they basically let a woman get away with murder. If she did do it they sure. Didn't prove she did it

This is such an injustice. KEYON PITTMAN is the guilty one. He's a manipulator and clearly manipulated the women in his life as well as the PROSECUTORS. I can't believe the jury found Carly GUILTY. The judge better overturn the verdict. If this is justice, then we all better be afraid. This is scary. There was no evidence against CARLA. Keyon set her up and I hope he is eventually investigated for murder. He NEVER loved AVIS and did not want to become a father or have to marry her. Keyon will get what's coming to him sooner or later. I KNOW he took the gun from Carla's home, killed Avis and then put the gun back in Carla's home later that night. Hell, we don't even know if for sure that was the gun that was even used in the murder. Keyon is a player and he was smart enough to play the prosecutor and the police and then move out of state to Michigan and marry someone else.

She has been found guilty!!!

When the trial started I was sure that Carla committed this crime. But as it went on I started saying "Hey wait a minute, it looks like it could have been the boyfriend". And from that point on I was back and forth. The gun incident doesn't make any sense at all. If you go to target practice isn't there some kind of tracking like registering, signing in, videotape? So I would say she looks guilty. But then the action of Keyon at basketball practice. Why of all days he did not participate, interact with his team and he was the head coach? Weird...

Then the shoes being in her closet I would say she looks guilty. But then him having a key to her apartment and having access to where the shoes were found, I would say reasonable doubt!
This has been the hardest case I have seen in a while and glad I was not a juror.

I believe Pittman should be charged, he manipulated and framed Carla. the police department did not do a through investigation and now her live as been cut short. it saddens me how she is being charged with this and its obvious that its more to the story. there should be an appeal. my heart goes out to Carla and her family. Pittman will have his day.

I think Ms. Hughes demise in the guilty verdict ruling was the gun she borrowed from her cousin and returned it without bullets. I also believe she probably told her cousin not to mention it when she returned it. The cousin did not want a part of it for fear of it being somehow revealed in the future, and therefore reported it to the authorities.

That (the gun) was the most crucial evidence that the jurors probably based their ruling on. There should have been more explanation (although the defense did not have the burden to prove) should have come from the defense somehow in explaining why the gun was returned empty with the same number of bullets used in the murders. A person cannot "target shoot" with just five bullets.....

Just read the guilty verdict and am in agreement with the jury. The gun!!! I just couldn't get past the gun. MS or not, she sure is lacking in common sense. Every woman knows better than to fool around with someone who is spoken for. She wouldn't have liked it if the shoe (pardon the pun) was on the other foot. She looked mean and spiteful to me. I hope she does get the death penalty because life in prison will not torment her soul, she just didn't give a hoot.

Hughes borrow the gun and a knife to protect her self. She went target shooting and used up the bullets. The knife had a blade of 3 inches.In order to used the knife she would be close to use it. A man is not going to backdown from a women. Pittman did not know that she had a gun. How did he know where the gun was without going through her place and not making a big mess it would take time to locate it. Pittman had to get bullets for the 38. If he purchase them there should be a record .He also had to returnit in the same place. Hughes did not know it was missing. Something is wrong there. I would not sit in jail for all that time and not say a word about it. I'am not sticking up for him to me he is a low life doing what he did. He ruin three people life and will not be accounted for it .

I have watched CourtTV/TruTV from the very first day and this is the worst I have seen. I think that Keyon did the deed but I do think Carla helped. I cannot beleive she is not giving him up. I refuse to believe she murdered Avis and now she is paying with her whole life for someone obviously not worth it. I really feel bad for Carla's family and Avis's family. This is a terrible injustice!

I believe Ms. Hughes committed this crime. Her cousin said she borrowed his gun and knife. If she was innocent, why lie to police about an affair with Pittman and having access to a gun and knife? If innocent, there was no need to lie about those things.

I don't see Pittman as guilty of anything other than womanizing. Why do women go for men like that? I don't get that part. But the prosecution left holes and the defense did not plug any holes. Neither one put on a good case. Circumstantial evidence is going to get Hughes. It just doesn't make much sense any other person would do that WITH THAT GUN AND THAT KNIFE.

Carla would have testified IF she hadn't committed the murder...come on folks, it it were you they couldn't keep you off the stand and IF you didn't do it YOU would be able to sway at least a few jurors if not all of them...IF you didn't do it there would be facts to be introduced through your defense to show that...I know it is not the defense's burden to prove you innocent but if you are innocent there are points to be made on your behalf...why didn't she explain the situation?

I believe carla is innoscent the evidence is not there to put her in the garage or anywhere at the murder scene. I believe she is innoscent and the verdict will be INNOSCENET BEYOUND A REASONABLE DOUGHT! The family of the murdered woman should not let pittman get away with their daughters murder. I wouldn't.

Carla may have played a role in this murder and should be punished but the actual murderer got off scott free. I would bet he is dancing a jig about now but i dont think it will be the last we here about him. He will mess up and eventually i hope the truth comes out. I know the jury took this case seriously and i am sure i missed some of the facts but to me this was very clearly planned by both of them. By the way i watch / listen to tru tv everyday from 8a – 2 pm. It is educational and entertaining. Thanks.

dorothy October 13th, 2009 3:22 pm ET

verdict was reached as of 3pm supposed to be posted here. Any ONE know results ?
*********************************************
Guilty on all counts. Sentencing phase set for tomorrow.

Why is this about Keyon Pittman? He is neither dead nor on trial. Obviously, the evidence led the police to Carla. What are you people talking about? Do you just ignore ALL that evidence related to her and make up scenarios where he did it?

What difference does it make whether he cried or not? Her cousin did not lend him the gun, he loaned it to her. She returned it. What difference does it make that she did not return the knife. She had one and the victim was knifed. Who cares what she did with it?

Are the police conspiring with Keyon to let him go? Or do they just have no evidence to believe he did it? They looked into him. They charged him first. All the evidence led to her. This is not a made-for-tv movie; the outcome is not "the bad guy did it" This is real life and the "good girl did it."

You see Carla as your daughter or sister or friend. Cheating men have mothers and fathers and sisters and brothers and friends. He too was educated. He apparently was appealing since so many women ALLOWED him to mack them. His fiance and baby are dead. He's responsible but that doesn't mean he murdered them.

There is doubt whether Carla did it, but there is not REASONABLE doubt. But then again, she is cute, educated and from a good family...there's your reasonable doubt.

More importantly, the victim was cute and educated and loved by her family. She's not the tpye of person that should have been lying in a pool of blood on a cold garage floor lifeless.

There were many holes in this case and CERTAINLY reasonable doubt. However, I think one of the problems was constantly going on about how pretty, beautiful and smart she was. Excuse me, but there were other people with those same qualities have killed people. And a jury of mostly women won't care how pretty she is, b/c women by nature of jealous of other women. And women surely won't take kindly to some harlot cheating with another woman's man especially when there is an unborn child involved!!!! I personally think that they both were in on it together. I think she knows more than she is saying, why else would the Defense have tried so hard to put it on him. Either way, she never should have lied to the police. Why say she wasn't involved with him when she was? A simple lie goes a long way in making a person look guilty......I think she did it. BUT, there were enough holes in that case to drive a motor home through. Either way, how could such a smart woman have been so dumb!? To bad, so sad.

I just started following this case, and with all the evidence I've heard, to many holes, too many doubts. The shoe print on the door, could have been done with the (shoe in the hand trick). Pittman disappearing act(30-45 mins), reasonable doubt. Pittman had all access to Carla's resident; including gun and knife. No tears, mean what it is, no tears. And why would a person sit across the way, while the one they love is dying or died, waiting on 911 Emergency Response. He killed his girlfriend, that cheating dog. That Department of Officers are stupid. This is what U call a classic set-up, even the facts point to that.

I would hate for an innocent person to be given the death penalty for a crime he/she has not committed. Sharing clothes, shoes, hats, bags, etc. with another person(s) is not a safe thing to do as in this case, the shoes. As for Mr. Pittman, something is really missing.

I am with the defense team, in regards to the evidence and how the police department presented their information, do they not watch FORENSIC FILES, 48HRS and other investigative tv shows, it is just unbelievable how this mess mapped out, I believe that Mr Pittman is quilty and Carla is guilty by association, i believe she knows that Mr Pittman killed her, but she also know that she could have been named as accessory to the crime, so she took her chances in court, I hope that she gets off, i feel so sorry for the Banks Family, what a great loss, Mr Pittman should be put on trial after this is concluded. I hope she learns her lesson, LEAVE OTHER PEOPLE MAN ALONE, get her own, and dont settle for men who already have women.

Southly,

She had effective Counsel. Her problem was the over kill of the victim. Shooting then slashing the woman? It was the horrible nature of the crime and the fact that he wasn't about to leave his fiance for her. People could see her face while he testified....it was her and the circumstances of the case that caused her to get this verdict, not her Counsel.

I'm not here to judge -that burden was placed on some else in this matter. However, life is what it is and so Hughes must make the best of what's left of her life. As for us, we all must learn something from this lesson.!!!!

Like- love triangle are messy- avoid at all cost. As you may win the battle but lose the war> Be honest with yourself as well as others.

I think Hughes had a terrific defense but the facts still remains: The weapon used to kill Bank was entrusted to Hughes. She had a duty to either confess she committed the crime or state that she gave the gun to Keylon. For me that was a major concern. Where was the knife??? Wrong search dog?? Cell phone tower???? I could care less – I wanted to know "how did someone else get the gun that was given to Hughes to kill her rival" .

None of us was there and so we will never no the complete truth but I can say "God will will be done!

This is truly sad. Carla Hughes found guilty... All of the evidence pointed at Pittman... The BLOODY shoes, which he borrowed the same day.... and admitted to that..... This was clearly a set up... The one thing that Ms. Hughes can be guilty of is falling for such a slick character... If anything, she may have played a part but she was not the triggerman.... I believe the jury based their decision on the fact that she did not testify and in their minds, that meant guilty... I hope that they can sleep easy tonight knowing that the wrong person MAY have been accused. They should let one of jury members or even the D.A tell her 5 year old son that she may not be with him long because of this verdict. I hope that PITTMAN is on his knees PRAYING!!! Because he is going to need some serious prayer...

Michelle, I don't know why you would think Pittman would not consider murdering his fiance. Just because his other love interests live(d) in the same town as he. He just needed an easy way out, and he found it so he thinks. I pray justice will be served, and if Huges is innocent, God bless her and may he continue to be with Avis' loved ones.

Now that she has been convicted, I think justice would best be served if charges are levied against Keyon as well. That guy knows more than he is saying. If that police dept. and that DA office want to be seen as being competent people, they will bring charges against him as well. May that poor woman rest in peace.

I think she is guilty but I think she was also doomed by her defense team. The so called Senator Wall wow no wonder our government is in such bad shape

I believe that pittman did it and carla helped and she couldn't say anything because she would implicate herself .

She has been found guilty. If you take an overall look at the entire picture, all of the evidence points to her being guilty...the gun especially.

The Program ended just as the verdict came in can someone tell me what it was, and what was her reaction.

Did anyone beside myself think that this guy that these women loved could have had the defendant bring him the gun and knife where he did the killing, then told her to get rid of the gun and knife. She could have been so in love with the guy that she did this. Sad case any way you look at it. I believe he was involved.

carla had a look on her face during the trail like i wish you would say anything like she was intemidating the jury also the prosecuting team as well. remember she's been incarcarated for three years and she looked like a thug then. just pray and think about the decision that you made knowing that no one is going to leave there wife are girlfriend for the other women.

By now, it doesn't come as any surprise that a man w a pregnant
girlfriend (w whom he shares a home), goes out & has an affair
w another woman with whom he works--I'm waiting for the
verdict that has come down just before 3 PM--I expect the jury will
find Carla Hughes Guilty-–if this happens, I wouldn't be surprised
if she then tries to save herself from a possible death penalty by
alleging Pittman played a role in the killing-–

Why did Keyon had to borrow her shoes? I felt that with all the other women that he have, one of them could have bought him a pair of tennis shoes. I think he borrowed those shoes from her so that if he went out in commited a crime, then he can say that those were not his shoes, so therefore the evidence would be pointed back to Carla Hughes. An I don't understand why she stayed in jailed for 3 long years anyway, Because She was not found at the crime scene, KEYON was. And It makes me wonder was the BABY that Avis was carrying............Keyon.
Greenville, Ms.

Thanks to the people on the jury for seeing this wolf in sheep's clothing for what she really is – as I said before, if it looks like a duck, walks ike a duck, and quacks like a duck, it is probably a duck!!! Just because she has all this education, sure didn't make her street smart. No man will ever be worth the rest of her life. Look how easily he moved on, married someone else and probably just thinks of her as a bad dream. She meant little to nothing to him. How sad for her family.

My ? Is where r the coaches testimonies, and the parents tht picked up their kids frm him tht night? Why haven't they come forth to say, "yes he was at practice? N I'm like mr walls, ur able to dial 911 even if the cell phn is nt in service. N why did keyon call carla in say "they killed her". Who is they? An why was tht ? Nvr asked?

I knew avis banks she was so sweet kind hearted wouldnt hurt a flee.i know this is so sad but now the family can rest in peace and go on with their lives and cherish the memories of her.i only pray for their strength in god to continue on as they hve for the past 3 years. thank you all sooomuch for covering the trial

A lady kicks in a door, A lady shots another lady five times, a lady pulls a ladies pants down, a lady ramshacks a home as a robber. A future Husband and father cant cry,does not enter the garage until police get there also cant call 911 and has to have someone else do it, does not drive in the drive way because car leaks oil. Did not stay to practice with basketball team, left early THAT DAY, made sure he was alone did NOT give the child or the assistant coach who he normally would transport a ride. I'm not a lawyer nor am I stupid some things hold clear common sense reality. The police also are to blame for this verdict, wow when did we get to the point of not doing everything that procedure states in a homicide case from start to finish. She Miss Carla Hughes has been framed and used as a scape goat for laziness.I don't see the Killer in her. Pittman is laughing at the justice system.

I will pray for u and your family it really sadden me to have to see a women go down on deathro and lose her whole life behind a man LOVE SUCKS it cant be that deep that just me but the mind works in some weird ways.

The gun convicted her. If the bullets were missing because of target shooting why didn't the defense provide evidence that she went target shooting. I would have provided some evidence that she went target shooting. Then the defense said that Pittman did it. Which is it???? The bullets were missing because she went to target shooting or he stole the gun and killed Avis then returned the empty gun. Why would she say the bullets were missing because she went target shooting if the defense's theory that he stole the gun and used it in the killing were true. Doesn't make sense at all. If the defense's theory was correct and Pittman stole the gun killed Avis then put the gun back she shouldn't have known that the gun was empty. She would have told her cousin that she didn't know why the gun was empty. Also I didn't hear all the the closing arguments but one of her lawyers kept saying that the jury should go with the evidence not surmise. That's what they were asking the jury to do surmise that Pittman did the killing. There was no evidence that Pittman was the killer. The evidence took you to Carla. The defense didn't make any sense to me. My heart goes out to Avis's family not Carla.

I've only watched the trial for two days and the prosecutors did not do a good job of proving that Ms. Hughes commited the crime if the verdict is GUILTY I would'nt be able to sleep knowing i was the juror who had a hand in giving her that verdict judging by the lack of evidence and so many unanswered question I pray for the family of the victim this was a severe case of when CHEATING goes wrong.

@ Eazy- If the gun was ever out of Hughes possession then that fact should have been CLEARLY stated. This seem like a crime where a woman emotions were strongly involved so much so that she made a poor decision.

Honestly I believe that she may be guilty base off the fact that the gun used to kill Banks was given to Hughes by a trusted family member- the family member was able to determine by Hughes body Language that a crime was committed. She had motive and her where abouts were unknown at the time of the murder.

However it is the facts and lack of those facts that still have me concern in this case and we all know that the law clearly states she must be found guilty beyond any reasonable doubt. I have doubts and so do many others. Therefore, the prosecution totally failed in this instance to prove beyond a reasonable doubt .

The laws does concern itself with whether or not Hughes commit the crime(b/c we were not there) The law wants to know if it can be proven w/o any other reasonable doubts. If there are any other reason doubts or possibilities than she should not have been found guilty according to the law.

albeit a tough case to prove and despite a couple of bunglings by the prosecution I do believe a guilty verdict will be found but a life in prison without parole will be the just punishment.

It dosen't matter how educated you are, emotional frustration and jealousy can trump everything, and they make people do unimaginable things, including murder. And think about it, why would ANYONE keep ANYTHING they used to commit a murder, including their shoes? It's because people who act out in emoitional rages aren't thinking clearly. Nothing in the evidence ever indicated that Pittman ever knew anything about the weapons Carla borrowed from her cousin. She only had them in her posession for 5 days. She did this entirely on her own. It was her plan, she set it in motion by getting the weapons, and then she saw it through. Pittman is a childish, and manipulating person, and his actions undoubtably drove Carla to the point of no return, but he himself had no motive for this, he had nothing to gain be killing Avis and his unborn son. The brutal attack on Avis, especially the vicious cuts on her face, clearly indicates jealous rage and hatred. This was the work of the other woman, (Carla) who felt scorned.

I just do not know what to make of this case. The prosecution did not make a very strong case against Ms. Hughes in my opinion. I thought that you had to be guilty beyond a reasonable doubt? I say that there was alot of doubt. I know she made some mistakes when she decided to date and see a man that was engaged but, that doesnt make someone a murderer. I could be wrong though. I whole heartedly believe that he had something to do with the murder of his fiance. I wish she would have gotten on the stand and at least tried to defend herself. I think that is where they went wrong. The jury asked why she never testified on her own behalf and the judge wrote back and said that she decided and made the decision not to. If it was my life that was on the line I would have without a doubt told my side of the story if I knew I was innocent. This should be a lesson learned for everyone because we never know when one of us may find ourselves in this sort of situation. I pray that we never. My heart goes out to all of the families involved in this tragedy. I wonder who he will be with tonight?

I really cant believe that Carla was found guilty. All of the evidence pointed at Keyon.
Men come a dime a dozen and I just cant believe that Carla was that in love with Keyon to kill someone just to have him to herself. It sounds like she had a good life and all Keyon was is a teacher. If I had a man who was involved with someone else I would want him to be doing better than me financially and materialistictly. Keyon didnt even have his own house from what I heard on the trial. What did he have to offer but a phone conversation . I cant believe the jurors.

Clearly there is reasonable doubt in this case, thus the jury should return a not guilty verdict. BUT, geeze, Pitman, why wasn't he a co- defendant in this trial? Some questions I would ask, -Did Pitman have other children that he pays child support for (likely yes); did Avis Banks have a ring and date; did Avis suspect Pitman was sexing Carla; did the school principle or other teachers testify about this love triangle; is there an insurance policy on Avis Banks, lastly, why did the cousin ask for gun back?? did he/she think Carla could harm another?

This is a tough case, but, I think Avis' killer will get away with murder.
Shame.

carla should have taken the stand if i was fighting for my life i would have . missippi love to kill people and lock them up for life . thats why i would have taken the stand ,

I've been following this case daily but what strikes me is all the comments on Pittman a player and a cheater and he should be found guilty in this case not Hughes. Lets get to the facts 'GUN AND KNIFE' that Carla borrowed from cousin for protection. Now how could Pittman be involved with the evidence, althou he had possession of her apt keys you mean to tell me he went in apt straight to the gun and knife supposely carla had borrowed, wheras
he only needed a gun to comment a murder and not both gun and knife. Then if so that the GUN AND KNIFE where the evidence why Carla didn't report to authorities, yet she return the GUN to her cousin claiming she was at a firing range she knew the gun was empty. She was the last person who had possesion of the weapon that was used at the scene in her hands when it was return to her cousin empty. Now how in the world could anyone put Pittman in the line of fire. Who again was the last to physically have the weapon in question? You can't tell me Pittman went to Carla apt knew about the gun and knife took the weapons to his home and killed his fiance hello? He could have used his own knife if so. Yes Pittman was a player but when it comes to who done it, Who was the last person to have possesssion of the weapon? CARLA HUGHES who return it to her cousin.

I'm shocked with the verdict, carla demeanor was very assurance,I prayed for the truIth of this case, carla there is a GOD, He knows Allthings, I wil continue to pray for u and your family.

Like someone said part of this was justified what about the other half he is guilty as well.

One of the strongest emotions is JEALOUSY!!! It will make a person that appears to be the most rational, in control, laid back person, become totally determined to take control of a situation they have been obsessing about. I have witnessed two different people in my life described just like Carla as well educated, professional, life planned out, become hateful, deceiptful, lying, raging, sneeking, ect.
Plus, the other woman was pregnant with her lovers baby, a bond that
would never be broken. I believe Carla planned this killing out of rage. The wounds on the victim proves the rage Carla had for her. He would not have done the deed, he had his cake and was eating it too!!
He has the ability to partition his love life into several different pods to suit his needs, he just didn't expect the out come. That game is very dangerous!!!

Carla Hughes borrowed the gun and knife from her cousin. After the murder was committed, she returned the gun empty.
The knife was never found. If she borrowed these items so that Keyon could kill Avis, why didn't she tell the police this story. Had she made a deal with the police and testfied against Keyon she may have received a lesser charge. Conspiracy to commit murder is a lot better than two first degree murder charges. Why would she keep quiet about his role in this murder if it is true. He probably never knew she had the gun and knife,who brings a loaded gun into a house with a small child? (an idiot) It was up to Carla to implicate Keyon. She did not do this until the trial. Why? She wanted to have Keyon in the end that's why. He is a despical cad. Maybe we can try him for that.

Carla !!! I felt that you held back in court by not testifing!! I have watched this from beginning/end and all i can say is closed mouths dont get fed!! Why didn't you tell all that you knew? What happened to to that knife? Why did they not check ur clothes for gun residue? Why did they not mention the fact that avis banks house had been broken into two weeks before the murder? Why did pitmann envite the basketball mom out of town for a weekend rondavou six months after the death of his future wife?? Why did he re-marry one year after this tragedy? Just what kind of love is this!! I think we can all learn somehting from this case!! If he/she belongs to someone else no matter how sweet/handsome they may seem to be, JUST LET THEM BE!!!!!!!

I am pleased this beautiful young lady and her unborn baby got the justice they deserve. However it is a tragedy for all involved.

why didn't anyone ever mention the fact that Pittman had many women, he had access to ms. hughes apartment (therefore the gun & knife). He married someone quite quickly after the death of his fiance & child, maybe Carla Hughes was the set up in advance (well planned by Kenyon) and always intended to use her as a patsy, then be free to be with the one he married. I can think of many scenario's on what his motives were, and yet, she borrowed the gun for only a couple days (if she was afraid for herself and needed protection, then why would she return both weapons after only a couple of days.... I think they might have been in cahoots together, her believing he was going to be with her, and borrowed the weapons upon his suggestion, and he did the killing. Maybe she did it and maybe he did it, whatever is the truth, she is now going to spend her life in prison, and he will be free to womanize others..........

A guilty verdict. I agree. I also want to say that , that poor excuse of a man ruined two womens lives and thier families! How does he pay for his sins?

I really don't think Pittman had anything to do with the murder of his finace. He's use to playing around and any woman who thinks they will change this type of man is sadly mistaken. I think he might have been entertaining the Basketball Mom when not in sight of the other coach, but he doesn't look like a killer. He loves having his cake and eating it too, and I think he's use to women fighting his battles for him. I bet seeing his dead fiance scared the stuffings out of him, and I do think he might have been scared of Carla, his Godsend, b/c he knew she meant business. I don't blame him for leaving town. I do blame him, and those like him (men and women), for being scumb.

My condolences to the family of Avis. That young lady and her baby were like lambs to the slaughter. Thank God her cousin and uncle had the decency to turn in the gun.

ok all this happened back in 2006 and they are saying they are still waiting results to see if he had gun residue on his hands. If I am wrong would someone please correct me. If its true then how the hell does it take this long to get results and also how could they start a trial knowing that these results aren't in yet. I reallly can't decide about this one.

Well the Verdict is in. GUILTY... I always felt Carla did it and what a
waste. Maybe this will be a lesson to all the Women who put them
selves in this position. He's off married and living his life, and as we
can now say " LUSTING" can be a terrible, terrible thing.

I am so happy that the jury came back with the right verdict.. I do hate to hear others saying poor Ms. Carla Hughes; give me a break.... how about the true victims poor Avis Banks and the innocent baby. There was no reasonable doubt if you truly listened to the evidence. Mr. Pittman was/ is guilty of only one thing and that is infidelity, and lets not forget he was not on trial, all the evidence points to the one who is truly guilty. How about how everyone is talking about what a dog Mr. Pittman is how about Carla where were here morals? or she must not have any. Please she is so guilty, and one day she will truly have to answer for her horrible crime. God bless the victims, Avis and the baby and all her family, friends, and loved ones. Great job to all the jurrors and the Prosecuting attorney.

Jean: Great work!

Was the gun ever swabbed/tested on the inside of the barrel of the gun?

Often times when a gun is fired at close range, the impact of the bullet causes blood to fly into the barrel.
I did not hear some of the testimony on the gun and injuries to Avis.

Thank you

I noticed with interest just how often Keyon Pittman blinked his eyes during his testimony.

However, I would ask for a mistrial, on the basis that jurors broke the law. The moment that question was asked, regarding the defendant testifying, a mistrial should have been called. Definitely an appeal winner! But I don’t mind the defendant doing the time while appealing

To obtain a Master's Degree, takes lots of patience!!!!!! I just wish she had the patience to pray and ask God to heal her broken heart, prior to this horrible crime....And Trust me, he is ABLE......
I will continue to pray for each family......

i dont believe in the death penalty just life in prison

cause the bible says thou shalt not KILLLLL

I was TOTALLY wrong, obviously, in my assessment of what was happening with the JURY...

I am ACTUALLY very STUNNED at the decision....

dear mrs. linda hughes praise be to god who gives us the victory. i want you to remain strong and bold in the lord. we do not know why god allows certain things to happen in our lives but its all for his glory wheather good or bad we just have to trust him and what ever the outcome be praise god any how. remember god is still sitting on the throne and he gets the last say so. he is the jury the judge and the public defender. the bible says to trust in the lord with all you heart and lean not on your own understanding and he will direct your path.even though a life has been takin god will still get glory ouf it because he does not make mistakes he knew it would allready happen. i also pray for the other family that they would truely forgive your daughter so that they can move on. sometimes forgiveness is better said than done . we just pray for the family that something good will come out of it. i will continue to pray for you and your family and also the other family remember no weapond formed against neither family will prosper. so keep your prayers up and also keep the other family in constant prayer because they will need all the uplifting that they can get because loosing a love one isnt easy to deal with but you both can get through it with the help of god.sincerely one of gods child soneone who cares about you and the other family.

i think the young fellow killed the woman its imposible to get gun powder on you except he pulled that triger himself .the young woman was railroad

Is the fact admitted by her own loved ones that ; she is someone who plans very detailed ,self motivated, self-serving, and goes after anything sje wants. Loves to do all her own planning and is a go-getter. Doesn't like to come in second, works hard for what she thinks she wants. Can't it be less obvious that she was jilted by this man by his actions of not leaving his fiancee, nor leaving his other girlfriends for her. I don't think she could take it when she thought she could "win" him . Afterall, she worked hard for him and was used to getting what she worked for. Too bad her morals , the life she should have practiced what she preached, would have kept her away from ALL of this. I do believe she planned and killed her rival, maybe to entrap him to get back at him.

I for one could not give this woman the Death Penalty..There are just too many incidentals that tells us that she did not act alone..I serious doubt that she was actually the one who killed Avis..

give life not death i still think she is hiding somthing susan smith killed 2 of her own babies she got life not death....

mr pittman do not look like hes all that what did he have a magic stick and why he is not concern about carla anymore he do not care if she live or die dirty rat......

Was Carla Huges Married?

In response to the gentleman that said "Who cares if she's a woman, if she murdered someone she should be put to death", my comment is, "whoever the defendant is, male or female, during a death penalty phase, you have to look and all of the mitigating factors. If it were a man, and he had an exemplary past as Carla had, and, could be a positive person while incarcerated, then the verdict should be life". Please don't forget all who have been wrongly convicted and now vindicated. I do think that will happen with Carla

I've watched the entire trail my heart has been with both families, I feel very sorry about Avis Banks not given a chance to live her life, it's just not fair. I also feel sorry for Carla Hughes and her son, she can never be their for him like her parents were there for her. I'm not convinced that Carla Hughes comitted the crime alone. I believe that Mr. Pittman was involved, but didn't have proof to convict him. It just doesn't add up. I'm happy that she didn't get the death penalty, but prison life isn't a bed of roses but she can live,unlike Avis Bank and unborn baby.

Whether or not Ms. Hughes committed this awful crime, whether she acted alone, or had the assistance of her lover will never be answered in this lifetime. People who commit such crimes with an accomplice only snitch if there's something in it for them. I believe the killers had the same agenda (get rid of her at any cost, it's all or nothing). Well someone got it ALL and someone got absolutely NOTHING. HOW PATHETICALLY SAD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Its a sad day in the good old USA today when the 12 came back with a guilty and then send this lady to persion for the rest of her life the judge and the state let all us down today this lady didnt do this and the state and the police new it when will WE THE PEOPLE SAY THIS IS NOT RIGHT AND DO SOMETHING TO CHANGE THIS. I have seen where the state had more on people that was charged with the same thing and walk and yet this court let this happen whats wrong with the courts I just dont understand how this how this could have happend My prayers are with miss Hughes and her family and friends and I pray that the Judge and the the 12 that gave her this guilty and the state proscutor i pray that God have mercy on you all for you

This was really tough. Although the defense raised some doubts, it's hard to say. I just wonder what in the world was she thinking or if she was thinking at all. I would hate to belive she would do such a thing. She may be covering up for dude. These men make you do some crazy things, but there is NO WAY IN HELL I'd risk spending the rest of my life in prison for one. I have way too much to live for. Now she's going to prison and he's out here living his life. God's eyes are not closed. My prayers go out to both families.

Something doesn't add up here. That said, the gun did her in.

hi Ash, If there is a death pennalty in Miss, then what kind of case would qualify if a woman and an unborn child is murdered does not qualify. I do not agree in the penalty verdict

I do not understand all the sympathy for Carla in this case, and I cannot believe the number of people that believe Keyon must have been involved. As a woman, it is insulting to suggest that this EDUCATED woman must have been controlled by a man. As a teacher, I am disgusted to see her lack of concern for contributing to another child growing up without a father, especially since I am sure she has seen the impact of this in her own classroom. Carla cared only for her own self interests, as did Keyon. They are two adults, only Carla is worse. She was willing to kill for what she wanted. The slash marks on the face tells a lot. Not only did she kill Avis, she also disfigured her. Why? Avis was the woman who apparently had Keyon's heart, and Carla wanted to make her ugly. Why pull down her pants? Was it a bad attempt to make it look like a rape, or was it another message to Keyon - He'd never have her again. Carla was fine with leaving a child fatherless if Keyon left Avis, and she had no difficulty killing an innocent woman and unborn child so she could get her man - or revenge for being scorned. Just how upstanding is she? Where were her morals and belief in God when she decided to sleep with a man who was engaged to another woman and had a child on the way? Hell hath no furry like a woman scorned.

I can't help but wonder if the "emotion" from Defense attorney is considered coercion and manipulation to the jury.

Carla Hughes by right should have gotten Death.This woman took two live's, Behind a man that she still does not have. For her family to stand their and Speculate on how upstanding Carla Hughes use to be is not important at this point. She killed two human being's.I watched the whole trail,Carla Hughes eye's where so telling.She felt like she could get away with murder because of what she use to be.I commend her uncle and her cousin for they knew what she had did. So did her mother.Like her father said she didn't listen to anyone.If i can say that i ever saw a killer before Carla Hughes is one.Like i said her eye's said it all.Pure evil.She actually looked like a devil. Her attorney played on everyone's heart's string but deep down inside i think he knew she did it also.Det.Frank Dillard acted as if he could care less about the whole case.Carla Hughes attorney is such a fake. He went overboard. Carla Hughes is guilty as sin.

I want to know how come they didn't charge both of them with the murder. I think that they should consider that he was involved with the murder because if he wasn't how could carla Know where the woman stayed and what time she was going to be off work and if she was comming striaght home.

I agree with the last comment how did carla know what time avis will be coming home because pittman told her, or he did it alone? he should have been convicted as well, he plays a big part in this case so many unanswered questions loop holes not enought evidense for ms hughes. he took the gun, shoes and committed this crime how he remarries and live a free life. it's call (RETRAIL) she needs to get on the stand this time

Eazy,
Glad you are not on the jury. Easy to find little questions to mess up a prosecution in your own mind, but beyond a reasonable doubt does not mean everything has to be nice and tidy.