|
September 4, 2009 King's fate in a jury's handsPosted: 02:13 PM ET
SARASOTA, Florida – Closing arguments in the penalty phase concerning convicted killer Michael King have now concluded and the jury is deliberating over whether he should face the death penalty.
Prosecutor Lon Arend, foreground, delivers his closing argument in the penalty phase as defendant Michael King, second from right, sits with attorneys at the defense table Prosecutor Lon Arend argued to the jury that King's actions in committing the murder of 21-year-old Denise Lee were heinous, atrocious and cruel. Arend described how King was abducted from her home and taken to King's home where she was then raped. Lee was was in the back of King's car and saw the shovel that King got from his cousin. The dramatic 911 call, from Lee herself using King's cell phone, came with her knowing that shovel was in the car with her, Arend told jurors. Lee was taken to the woods, stripped naked and with one shot to the front temple of her head was shot dead. There is no evidence, Arend argued to the jury, that Lee had duct tape over her eyes. She saw everything up to and at the time of her death. Public defender Carolyn Schlemmer started off her closing argument by telling the jury that regardless of their finding of aggravating circumstances, they are never required to return a recommendation of death. Schlemmer told them that a vote for life would mean King, now a convicted murderer, would take his last breath in a Florida state prison, and it doesn't diminish the loss of the precious life of Denise Lee. The lead attorney urged the jury to focus on the entire life of King, one that included a life of non-aggressive behavior, being a good husband, father and boyfriend. She said witness testimony showed King exhibited good character traits during his life, a good record and background. Balance that, Schlemmer said, with the one "terrible, terrible day." King's attorney also argued that harshest penalty is not appropriate because of the defendant's below average intelligence. There was no way he could calculate such a cold-hearted, pre-meditated murder. Schlemmer told the jury King would not have had the cognitive ability to murder Lee and plan to evade arrest. The defense concluded by re-emphasizing the non-violent life of King and that nothing prior to January 17, 2008 contradicts those realities. -Jean Casarez, In Session correspondent Filed under: Uncategorized |
Contact us
Recent Posts
In Session Team
Archive
Categories
|
Loading weather data ...