In Session: Sidebar  « Back to Blog Main
June 4, 2009

Rockefeller imposter trial: defense begins

Posted: 09:15 AM ET

BOSTON, Massachusetts–A defense expert returns to the stand today to continue his testimony about the mental state of the man who calls himself Clark Rockefeller. On Wednesday, Keith Ablow, M.D. and another expert opined that Christian Gerhartsreiter is so mentally ill that he’s not criminally responsible for kidnapping his daughter last July.

Author, television personality and forensic psychiatrist Keith Ablow testified for the defense

Forensic psychologist Catherine Howe administered a series of tests to Gerhartsreiter designed to determine, in part, if he was malingering (or faking) mental illness. She concluded he was not. She also concluded that he suffers from two psychological disorders. The more severe is delusional disorder, grandiose type; the other is narcissistic personality disorder.

Those conclusions, however, are not consistent with a few of the test results. One test result indicated there was no evidence of mental illness. Another test showed there was no “major mental illness,” that is, delusional disorder. She opined that Gerhartsreiter tried to make himself seem less ill when taking the tests.

Howe explained that as Gerhartsreiter’s grandiose beliefs were reinforced, his disorder became more severe. That is, as people around him, especially his ex-wife Sandra Boss, continued to believe he was a Rockefeller who entered Yale at 14, who owned a multi-million dollar art collection, and who used to help Third World countries in debt refinancing, he spiraled deeper into his delusional disorder.

Christian Gerhartsreiter

The defense also called forensic psychiatrist Keith Ablow, who concurred with Howe’s findings. Ablow explained that people become narcissistic because they don’t feel good about themselves, so they reinvent themselves.

Ablow said Gerhartsreiter had an emotional reaction to losing custody of his daughter. His ex-wife and daughter relocated to London within days of the December 2007 divorce decree. Gerhartsreiter would wander the streets of Boston and believed he saw signs that meant he’d find his daughter around the next corner. He believed he communicated telepathically with his daughter and that she wanted him to take her away.

Suggesting that Gerhartsreiter is a liar, not delusional, Assistant District Attorney David Deakin read from an affidavit Gerhartsreiter filed in the divorce proceeding from Boss. In the passage read by Deakin, Gerhartsreiter stated that Boss created his fictitious educational background and told him to tell people that he entered Yale at the age of 14. Gerhartsreiter also claimed in the divorce that Boss was the sole wage earner, that he had no access to her accounts, and that she paid all the bills. But for Boss being the sole wage earner, these claims are a direct contradiction to the testimony of Boss.

Yet another identity Gerhartsreiter allegedly used in the past decades was revealed in court on Tuesday. According to Deakin, in 1984 and 1985, Gerhartsreiter posed as Dr. Reiter, a cardiovascular surgeon at a clinic in Las Vegas.

The prosecution is expected to call a psychiatrist in rebuttal. Closing arguments in this case are expected next week.

–Beth Karas, In Session correspondent

Filed under: Uncategorized


Share this on:
mrd   June 4th, 2009 10:43 am ET

the guy's a nut and a con. he needs locked up and certainly no access to the little girl ever.

AndyF   June 4th, 2009 12:19 pm ET

Uh, ok, the guy is nuts – or er, um... – he's not nuts – WHO CARES!!! He is a kidnapper and a con man and a consumate liar. THROW HIM IN A CELL AND THROW AWAY THE KEYS! ...and stop wasting taxpayer money on trials for nutcases who clearly do not deserve to live and walk among us.

trina   June 4th, 2009 12:44 pm ET

I totally agree! Does it really matter if he is delusional or not? He kidnapped his daughter! He made a deal to take money instead of joint custody and then he plotted, planned and kidnapped her. Do we really want him loose on the world?

Kim   June 4th, 2009 1:15 pm ET

...don't forget that he's a "person of interest" in a So. Cal. missing person / murder investigation–Linda Sohus, never found; and her husband John Sohus, who was found buried in the back yard where "Christopher Chichester" (his other phoney name before he became a Rockefeller) had lived with them at the time of their disappearance–he vanished shortly after they did only to resurface as a Rockefeller on the EC! conveniently he has no recollection about the So. Cal. part of his life...I smell not only a con, and a nut, but a sociopath and a murderer...

mary   June 4th, 2009 1:17 pm ET

what if anything has the rockefeller family had to say about this case

gordan   June 4th, 2009 1:23 pm ET

He needs to go to jail and never see the light of day again!

fromCanada   June 4th, 2009 2:00 pm ET

While I agree he needs to be locked up, what they're trying to determine is if he is responsible for his actions or if his "mental state" can give him a not guilty by reason of insanity verdict.

The defense is attempting to "win" the case by having him sent to a mental facility rather than jail.

alexatJBI   June 4th, 2009 2:03 pm ET

This man's life has been a fraud and a lie for many years, even before he married and had a child. If he were just insane, then something would have fallen apart a long time ago. He knew what he was doing. Throw him in jail and throw away the key!

DCReggie   June 4th, 2009 2:09 pm ET

I think he is readying himself for the upcoming murder trial of the couple he stayed with back in the day who was found murdered adn he took on their identity.

chris stephens   June 4th, 2009 2:37 pm ET

if "clark rockefller" is found not-guilty by way of insanity, who will determine if he should be commited to a mental instutition? will the judge make that determination? will the jury be aware that this is an option? will there be another hearing to address that issue?

keep up your outstanding work! much appreciated!

cheers,

chris

Richard   June 4th, 2009 3:48 pm ET

Rockefeller is giving a great performance for the jury: he cast his eyes down, interacts with no one and acts like a zombie. The fraud continues!.

Michelle   June 5th, 2009 12:49 am ET

He's a smart man, you can tell just by watching him the courtroom. He 'plays the part' of a delusional, insane man very well. He just sits there, doesn't move much, never writes notes or makes any facial expressions. People like him are so self-absorbed that they really do believe their own false stories. I felt so bad for his ex-wife as she was grilled on the stand by the defense. Just because she went to Harvard or wherever and made millions, doesn't mean that instantly made her immune to being a victim of emotional abuse. The jury will find him guilty – no doubt, but he'll probably serve very little time, if any.

gabbe Mac   June 5th, 2009 10:19 am ET

Hi Ashleigh, Love your show. This guy is a liar and a bottom dweller. If a liar can be deeemed innocent by reason of insanity...then we are all insane. Everyone lies at one time or another,,otherwise all of us would look good in skinny jeans. There is a difference between a lie and breaking the law, a difference between right and wrong. Throw these people in jail and make our daily interactions safer and less congested from contact from people like "clark Rockefeller".

Marina   June 5th, 2009 10:28 am ET

My first husband was such a different man after we got married. I wasn't young, I wasn't longing to be married, but I thought I saw a man with whom I could share my life. I saw a counselor to help me understand how I could have ignored warning signs and her answer was that he would have done anything, said anything to get me to marry him.
Therefore, I feel empathy for the defendant's wife and understand then her reluctance to leave, especially tearing a family apart.

Barb.NYC   June 5th, 2009 12:34 pm ET

He is a suspect in the double-murder of a young couple many
years ago...They befriended him, (and I believe they rented him a
room),..and then they vanished, and so did he. Some time later
it came to light that he was on the other side of country, having sold,
(or TRYING to sell) the couple's car...which HE had obviously been
using. When the authorities tried to get hold of him at that time, he
disappeared,..(by the way, during that whole time...WITH the couple,
and while he was selling their car...he was calling himself CHRIS
CHICHESTER). Years later, human bones were found in what HAD
BEEN the couple's backyard, (of only ONE person, the other person's
bones have NEVER been found). I think there's A LOT MORE to this
guy's story than the recent kidnapping!

Leave Your Comment


 

Comments are moderated by CNN, in accordance with the CNN Comment Policy, and may not appear on this blog until they have been reviewed and deemed appropriate for posting. Also, due to the volume of comments we receive, not all comments will be posted.


subscribe RSS Icon
About this blog

Sidebar takes you behind the scenes of the day's legal headlines with breaking news and in-depth analysis from In Session's anchors and correspondents.

Contact us
  • Questions or comments? E-mail
In Session Team
Jean Casarez
Correspondent
Jean Casarez
Beth Karas
Correspondent
Beth Karas
Mike Brooks
Law Enforcement Analyst
Mike Brooks
Midwin Charles
Legal Contributor
Midwin Charles
Sunny Hostin
Legal Contributor
Sunny Hostin
Powered by WordPress.com VIP