In Session: Sidebar  « Back to Blog Main
May 27, 2009

Here comes justice

Posted: 04:29 PM ET

NEW YORK –The news is only a day old and, already, I have issues with the coverage.

Judge Sonia Sotomayor with President Barack Obama after announcing her as his Supreme Court nominee

Issue one: Barack Obama did not pick judge Sotomayor just because she is Puerto Rican or female.

The president picked her, first and foremost, on merit. The woman went to Princeton on scholarships, graduated summa cum laude; she then went on to Yale Law School where she edited the Yale Law Journal. The story of her life journey, including the fact that Sotomayor comes from the projects, only serves to underscore her intellectual prowess, as do her race and gender, since she came up at a time when few women of color went to law school at all. The bottom line: Judge Sotomayor is more qualified than any of the current justices were at the time of their appointments.

Issue two: The description of Sotomayor as a judicial activist.

Anyone who has taken the time to study her record has to know that any description of her as such is plainly false. While she may be a trailblazer in life, she is a moderate in law. Yes, she will have to explain some off-the-cuff remarks she has made, when she gets to Capitol Hill; but the very fact that the opposition has to dig that deeply for fodder with which to criticize this impressive woman, only demonstrates the strength of her record as a judge. As the New York Times headline reads today – “A Careful Pen With No Broad Strokes.”

Issue three (and most concerning): The suggestion that the practice of law should have nothing to do with empathy.

Of course the rule of law must always prevail; and it is for judges to apply the law not to change it when they don't like it. To suggest that a judge should not be cognizant of the real world consequences of her decisions, however, is to ignore the reasons so many of us go to law school in the first place. That is, as Sotomayor suggested in her remarks yesterday, to sustain the vision of the Founding Fathers and a Constitution that protects the minority from the tyranny of the majority. Who better to do that than a minority woman with the intellectual heft of her forbearers? That is why she will ultimately prevail.

-Jami Floyd, In Session anchor

Filed under: Supreme Court


Share this on:
Michael Quintana   May 27th, 2009 7:03 pm ET

The truth is that her culture is a bigger issue than her merits, not just for me but for many others who oppose this selection. Hispanic is a very generic term that does not fairly represent the different cultures for which it is so often used. Hispanic is a term that was popularized under the Reagan Regime and is not the choice term for most American-Mexicans. There are many American-Mexican judges who are just as qualified sitting at just as high a level as Sotomayor was before Obama nominated her for the US Supreme Court. I personally feel that he jilted the American-Mexican community, and I will not be voting for him in the next election. He chose a member of a small population group which does not even represent 2% of this 50 state nation to be a representative of the so-called Hispanic community. Why would he choose to skip over at least four or five fully qualified American-Mexican candidates for this powerful seat??? Also, why are five members of the US Supreme Court from New York and New Jersey?!

mgsmith   May 27th, 2009 7:14 pm ET

Proud of President Obama's choice for judge, Sotomayor is greatly intelligent and qualified for the position...if GWH Bush elected her; that says alot. And if the Senate held her back, that resounds their lackluster to advance women or persons of color. Especially if they have a mind to go against the grain.

Spider   May 28th, 2009 9:18 am ET

Come on, Jami!!!

You may not want to accept the fact that she was nominated because she's a Puerto Rican woman, but it is a fact.
If she stood up beside three equally qualified white males, her race and sex would give her an edge.
You can actually say that you feel she would make a good judge because she's a minority female, but you deny that's why she was nominated.

Miriam   May 28th, 2009 9:53 am ET

This will known only as a race year.......that is all that is talked about instead of being just a human being it is race race race......thank you all media reporters for you are the responsible ones for this.

TLG   May 29th, 2009 1:12 am ET

Firstly, Jami, you're too hot to be a liberal. Anyway, Obama picked Sotomayor for several reasons. He needed someone to take the heat off of him with North Korea and Iran kicking his ass. Like Obama, she is also a poster child for Affirmative Action. If a white male had said that he hoped he made smarter decisions than a Lation woman, there is no way he would be confirmed as a US Supreme Court justice. Sotomayor is a racist and a sexist by her own statements. Also, she admits on video that she thinks that policy is written from the bench, Lastly, anyone so stupid as to say that the Second Amendment is not an individual's right should not be on the highest court in the land. Hello?!...the Second Amendment is part of the Bill of Rights. She'll probably be confirmed due to a liberal-lapdog media and a hefty majority of democrats in the senate. Obama may be surprised by the fact that she will end up being a pro-life jurist. Won't that be a riot when she tries to overturn the Second Amendment and ends up overtruning Roe v. Wade.

Robert   May 29th, 2009 11:34 am ET

Merits what merits. She has not been invovled in any major court ruleings. She has even gone on camera and said that appeals courts make policys. Appeals courts reder opninons and that is it. She has no clue as to what the job intails, and the only reason she is in the postion is race. She has no business in, on or near the Highest court in this land.

Galaxy   June 2nd, 2009 10:19 am ET

Well Jami?

For some reason my "other" nicer post was not posted here. So now the formalities of social dictate is out the door and I am freeing myself to say what I really mean.

OFF THE CUFF? OHHH so it is acceptable for a person of HISPANIC or LATINO origins to make OFF THE CUFF remarks and get away with it and ONLY have to ... "...JUST EXPLAIN THEM"? WHERE IS YOUR fricken outrage now Jami?

Uhhh yeah Jami, I agree. RAGE is a PERSONAL ISSUE and for you to blatantly endorse someone based ON GENDER and RACE spouting an almost vacant record as merit enough for appointment to such a position just goes to show JUST how racist YOU are.

Again, right and wrong is NOT GENDER OR RACE BIASED nor is discrimination. DISCRIMINATION IS DISCRIMINATION.

You bunch of racist pigs.

TYVM.

Spider   June 2nd, 2009 11:24 am ET

It should read:

"A Careful Broad Will Stroke No Pens"

George   June 2nd, 2009 5:40 pm ET

Hello Jami:

Let me first say I like you as a host on in session. I don't agree with you a lot of the time, but I think you are great at your job! I just have one question I hope you will answer: You stated: Issue one: Barack Obama did not pick judge Sotomayor just because she is Puerto Rican or female. So I have to ask you this: How do you personally know why he picked her? I do think he picked her for just the reasons you said he did not. The republicans are already down, how would it look if they object to her nomination? Think about it. I think it was a well planned out move by Mr. Obama!

I would love to hear what you think about what I think. Please reply.

I will keep watching & keep up the good job! :)

Cori   June 5th, 2009 5:36 pm ET

I'm happy to see her work her way there, not because of her "race", but because of her qualifications. She's a great candidate, educated, well-qualified, intelligent – everyone bashing her on this blog is jealous. Quit hating, wining, crying, complaining, etc. You're all probably drinking Rush's Koolaid.

Leave Your Comment


 

Comments are moderated by CNN, in accordance with the CNN Comment Policy, and may not appear on this blog until they have been reviewed and deemed appropriate for posting. Also, due to the volume of comments we receive, not all comments will be posted.


subscribe RSS Icon
About this blog

Sidebar takes you behind the scenes of the day's legal headlines with breaking news and in-depth analysis from In Session's anchors and correspondents.

Contact us
  • Questions or comments? E-mail
In Session Team
Jean Casarez
Correspondent
Jean Casarez
Beth Karas
Correspondent
Beth Karas
Mike Brooks
Law Enforcement Analyst
Mike Brooks
Midwin Charles
Legal Contributor
Midwin Charles
Sunny Hostin
Legal Contributor
Sunny Hostin
Powered by WordPress.com VIP