Comments on: Fate of O.J. Simpson in a jury's hands

By: Rose Decesere

Rose Decesere — Mon, 13 Oct 2008 17:52:53 +0000

THIS MAN HAS WALKED AMONG THE FREE WAY TOO LONG!!!
"GOOD RIDDANCE"!!!

By: Cynthia

Cynthia — Mon, 06 Oct 2008 19:28:28 +0000

O.J. Simpson took the law into his own hands to bully, rob and hold people hostage . From the moment he arranged the 'posse' of thugs to help him get back what he says were his things... he crossed the line and deserves all of what I hope will be a life sentence for him. One of the most telling things was the statement that he felt "betrayed' by Mike for selling his things instead of 'hiding them from the Goldman's." They are not his things. The Goldman's were awarded them in the civil suit and of course O.J. is above the law and the courts and immediately chose to break the law by having them hidden.
This woman abuser, road rage, jealous, murdering excuse for a human being has done nothing with his life but inflict physical and mental pain on others.

By: cristy

cristy — Sat, 04 Oct 2008 17:52:56 +0000

Set up or not, O.J. is finally paying for one of his crimes. He is an adult, maybe not an intelligent one, but he made the decision to go into that room it's on him.

By: G. E. Smith

G. E. Smith — Sat, 04 Oct 2008 17:18:56 +0000

The wheelsof justice turn slow–but ask not for whom the bell tolls O. J.-they toll for you.

By: Brantley

Brantley — Sat, 04 Oct 2008 15:28:11 +0000

There was no possible way OJH was going to get a fair trial. He was tried again for murder. I don't understand why some people in America when they are exonerated their life resumes to normal, why don't blacks in America receive the same treatment in the judicial system. Regardless of what you may think, there was clearly reasonable doubt in the Brown murder case. I followed that case daily and with objectivity. Based on the evidence presented OJ was innocent per legal standards. This robbery case was a bunch of bull with a list of trumped charges such as kidnapping. How many people go in meetings with secret recording devices unless they have ulterior motives. It was a farce. To the DA two wrongs don't make a right and the greatest judge of all is going to hand down a whole lot of verdicts that read,"depart from me I never knew you and your works were of iniquity." God does have the final say.

By: art still

art still — Sat, 04 Oct 2008 15:22:48 +0000

(P S) O J has made many mistakes in his life . His choice

of friends has been atrocious but the selection of a defense

attorney was his biggest mistake of all. Believe me, I know,

I hired him to represent me and never heard from him again.

Now I think he did me a big favor!

Art (Miami)

By: Jack MeHoff

Jack MeHoff — Sat, 04 Oct 2008 15:09:48 +0000

FINALLY THEY PUT THIS MURDERER AWAY. THE 1ST JURY WAS COMPRISED OF THE MOST STUPID PEOPLE ON THE FACE OF THE EARTH.

SCREW RACE RELATIONS... HE WAS GUILTY THE 1ST TIME AROUND, AND THE MOON CRICKETS KNEW IT.

I HOPE THAT THE THEIVES IN THIS CASE ALSO STOLE HIS BIBLE THAT JOHNNY COCRAN PUT IN HIS FAMILY ROOM FOR THE 95 JURY TO SEE WHILE VISITING HIS HOME. GOODBYE JERKOFF!

By: c.Rivers

c.Rivers — Sat, 04 Oct 2008 13:53:56 +0000

I REALLY DONT THINK OJ GOT A FAIR TRAIL....THESE PEOPLE CONVICTED HIM THINKING HE SHOULD BEEN IN PRISON..i THINK THEY SHOULD RETRY OJ ON THE REAL....THINK ABOUT IT OJ WAS LET GO 13 YRS FROM THE VERDICT DAY....THESE PEOPLE THOUGHT HE SHOULD BE LOCKED UP...ALL I CAN SAY IS WHITE PEOPLE PLAY A VERY DIRTY GAMES AT TIMES

By: Strat4jazz

Strat4jazz — Sat, 04 Oct 2008 12:02:57 +0000

You can argue robbery or recovery, you may also argue unfair trial, but what is at the bottom of this case is Mr. Simpson's failure to understand unlawful behavior has dire conseqences. Everybody rides on the karnma train, Mr. Simpson knew better (with his past) that going into a hotel room with members of his party armed for anything is going to lead to trouble.

By: Terri

Terri — Sat, 04 Oct 2008 01:11:15 +0000

If only someone else except OJ and this trial would not have taken place. The tax payer dollars for this trial. The Judge was slanted, the prosecution was slanted. Any person would have done the same to recover stolen propertly when law enforcement refused to help. They helped to set up the entire incident by doing nothing. Shame on the judicial system, shame on the Judge. This was only an attempt to make OJ pay for the past. Presumed inicident until proven guilty. Not the case when the Judge and prosecution work together. I worked in law enforcement and I know that the Judge and Prosecution work together. That is not a fair and some one needs to stop this kind of thing from happening. Shame on the Judge! Shame on the Police!!