In Session: Sidebar  « Back to Blog Main
July 17, 2008
Posted: 02:45 PM ET

NEW YORK — Cindy Sommer will be back in court Friday as her attorney argues that a pending murder charge should be dismissed with prejudice, meaning she could never face a retrial. Sommer was convicted of the arsenic poisoning of her husband, Todd, an active duty Marine, in January 2007. She was never sentenced to the mandatory term of life without parole because the judge ordered a new trial after finding her trial attorney made errors that tainted the process. The new trial was scheduled to begin last May but in April the San Diego District Attorney suddenly moved to dismiss the charges without prejudice. The mother of four had been in jail since November 2005 for a crime she says she did not commit. She was immediately released and has been living with relatives in northern California since then.

Earlier this year, in preparation for the new trial, the District Attorney had discovered more tissues from Sommer’s husband, taken at autopsy, and stored separately from tissues tested and used at the first trial. If Sommer had, indeed, murdered her husband by feeding him arsenic-laced food or drink, then these new tissues should have tested positive for arsenic. But they did not. There was no arsenic in any of the tissues which, incidentally, were taken from the same organs as those used at trial where arsenic was present. The difference was in how they were stored and where they were tested. Some samples were preserved in formaldehyde and others were frozen. The new tissues had been preserved in a third way, in paraffin blocks. The tissues used at trial were analyzed at a government lab. The new tissues were analyzed at a private lab in Quebec.The defense has always maintained that the samples used at trial were contaminated.

A new judge, John Einhorn, is hearing the motion to dismiss but Sommer’s attorney, Allen Bloom, wants the matter to go back to the original trial judge, Peter Deddeh, who is currently assigned to a different courthouse. The District Attorney’s position is that since the case was dismissed a few months ago there is no matter pending before Judge Einhorn and, hence, he has no jurisdiction to consider the motion. Sommer’s attorney, Allen Bloom, says that Einhorn or Deddeh has jurisdiction to hear it and that the court can consider not only evidence introduced at the trial but also the new evidence of arsenic-free tissues from Sommer’s husband that led to her release from jail.

–Beth Karas, In Session correspondent

Filed under: Beth Karas • Trials


Share this on:
rebecca riser-henrichs   July 17th, 2008 3:28 pm ET

leave her alone. th prosecutor has proved that justice is a joke!
they have taken enough from this woman and her children!!!

RJS   July 17th, 2008 4:15 pm ET

She has been in jail for how long? And now they decide she is innocent?
New DNA testing is proving that old DNA testing is unreliable. With more cases every day.
Shouldn’t anyone convicted and now serving time using prior DNA evidence be retried using the newer more reliable DNA testing? What about 10 years from now when they tell us they have even “better” DNA testing?
Dont worry about Iran or Korea - the real threat is the enemy within.

RJS

dan deering   July 18th, 2008 6:27 am ET

the da’s office is wrong they are not loking for justice the justice system in this country is serioulsy flawed towards convicting pepole on flawed or manfacutred evednce and the proscution is very goodat hiding evidence tat would clear many pepole in prison but they only want convictions not justice lay pepole could do a better job of justice because they are not predjudce one way or the other but juries never hear all the facts and no law enforcement offer should be seated on a jury because they are just power hungry pepole like gunn and dummias they want there way nothey are being fought tooth and nail and they look foolish doing it

Bonnie in Canada   September 22nd, 2008 1:30 pm ET

I watched that whole trial and I did Not believe from the very beginning that Cindy was guilty of murdering her husband Todd. After her guilty verdict I inquired several times on the appeal, but I didn’t hear anything until I heard of her release.A depressed person who takes up heavy drinking or a different way of dealing with things is not the making of a killer. My sister was murdered as I drank like a fish for 2 years, but I had nothing to do with her murder. I am glad she is released and I think the prosecutor should find someone else to harrass now. That family has been through enough.

Leave Your Comment


 

Comments are moderated by CNN, in accordance with the CNN Comment Policy, and may not appear on this blog until they have been reviewed and deemed appropriate for posting. Also, due to the volume of comments we receive, not all comments will be posted.


subscribe RSS Icon
About this blog

Sidebar takes you behind the scenes of the day's legal headlines with breaking news and in-depth analysis from In Session's anchors and correspondents.

Contributors
Ashleigh Banfield
Co-anchor of the daily trial program Banfield and Ford: Courtside
Ashleigh Banfield
Jack Ford
A former prosecutor and co-anchor of the daily trial program Banfield & Ford: Courtside
Jack Ford
Lisa Bloom
Anchor of the daily trial program Lisa Bloom: Open Court
Lisa Bloom
Jami Floyd
Former defense attorney and anchor of her own daily program Jami Floyd: Best Defense
Jami Floyd
Fred Graham
Senior Editor Fred Graham covers legal news in Washington, D.C.
Fred Graham
Jean Casarez
Attorney Jean Casarez covers trials around the country
Jean Casarez
Beth Karas
Former prosecutor Beth Karas covers trials around the country
Beth Karas
Categories
CNN Comment Policy: CNN encourages you to add a comment to this discussion. You may not post any unlawful, threatening, libelous, defamatory, obscene, pornographic or other material that would violate the law. Please note that CNN makes reasonable efforts to review all comments prior to posting and CNN may edit comments for clarity or to keep out questionable or off-topic material. All comments should be relevant to the post and remain respectful of other authors and commenters. By submitting your comment, you hereby give CNN the right, but not the obligation, to post, air, edit, exhibit, telecast, cablecast, webcast, re-use, publish, reproduce, use, license, print, distribute or otherwise use your comment(s) and accompanying personal identifying information via all forms of media now known or hereafter devised, worldwide, in perpetuity. CNN Privacy Statement.
Home  |  World  |  U.S.  |  Politics  |  Crime  |  Entertainment  |  Health  |  Tech  |  Travel  |  Living  |  Business  |  Sports  |  Time.com
Podcasts  |  Blogs  |  CNN Mobile  |  Preferences  |  Email Alerts  |  CNN Radio  |  CNN Shop  |  Site Map
© 2008 Cable News Network LP, LLLP. A Time Warner Company. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by WordPress.com