|
April 25, 2008
Posted: 01:02 PM ET
NEW YORK – Here’s the thing about jury verdicts: they almost always result in disagreement. That’s because, by definition, a case only goes to trial because the parties can’t agree on how it should be resolved. ![]() So we certainly shouldn’t be surprised that, even after the trial is concluded, the parties, and their supporters, still disagree. Sometimes that disagreement takes the form of a philosophical divide over the more profound legal issues in a trial. Other times that disagreement can take the form of a deeply felt anger over the verdict and an overwhelming frustration with what they perceive to be the failure of the justice system. This was the case in the reaction of Sean Bell’s family and friends to the “not guilty” verdicts in the trial of the police officers charged in Bell’s death. Watch some express outrage But it’s important to remember, whatever you may feel about this verdict, that “not guilty” doesn’t mean that the system failed. Rather, it simply means that after both sides argued their cases, a judge determined that the prosecution had not proven its case beyond a reasonable doubt. Read more And it is also essential that we remember that we can always disagree vehemently with the result in a courtroom, but we shouldn’t automatically assume that a difference of opinion justifies an indictment of the integrity of the justice system that rendered that verdict. The debate over this case will continue. And it is a testament to the family and friends of Sean Bell that they have encouraged all of their supporters to express their discontent in a peaceful fashion. As a final note, it is unfortunate that the New York court system has continued to refuse to allow cameras into their courtrooms. This is a case where the public would have benefited enormously from the opportunity to witness this case and assess the arguments of both sides firsthand. Watching and listening could only enhance an understanding of the verdict and better inform the debate that will, and should, follow. – Jack Ford, In Session anchor Filed under: Jack Ford Sean Bell Trials |
Recent Posts
Contributors
Related Links
Categories
|
|
CNN Comment Policy: CNN encourages you to add a comment to this discussion. You may not post any unlawful, threatening, libelous, defamatory, obscene, pornographic or other material that would violate the law. Please note that CNN makes reasonable efforts to review all comments prior to posting and CNN may edit comments for clarity or to keep out questionable or off-topic material. All comments should be relevant to the post and remain respectful of other authors and commenters. By submitting your comment, you hereby give CNN the right, but not the obligation, to post, air, edit, exhibit, telecast, cablecast, webcast, re-use, publish, reproduce, use, license, print, distribute or otherwise use your comment(s) and accompanying personal identifying information via all forms of media now known or hereafter devised, worldwide, in perpetuity. CNN Privacy Statement.
|
|