In Session: Sidebar  « Back to Blog Main
April 15, 2008
Posted: 06:06 PM ET

DETROIT, Michigan – We are on verdict watch. The jury left at 5 p.m. Tuesday after deliberating for three hours and 40 minutes in the “thrill kill” case of Michigan v. Jean Pierre Orlewicz. There have been several notes from the jury, one of which is very interesting.

ALT TEXT

The jurors asked if they could learn the sentencing differences between first-degree premeditated murder and second degree murder.

In a polite but firm tone, the judge reminded them they should not be concerned with the years Orlewicz might serve if convicted. The judge expressed her concern that “some of you are considering the penalty here…this is not appropriate.”

Orlewicz is 18 years old and common sense tells me his young age may be on the mind of some of these jurors. Watch his testimony

The jury also asked for the statements of prosecution witness Adam Duwe, the teen Orlewicz said was going to be extorted on November 7, 2007, as well as the statements of Alex Letkemann. Duwe did not give a statement to police and only one statement of Letkemann’s was entered into evidence. The jury has that now. Jurors also asked for and received 10 photos, including two of the body of Dan Sorensen.

The families have been in the courtroom waiting. The Sorensen family seems at ease, talking with close friends. The Orlewicz family seems on edge. Attorneys from both sides are in the well of the courtroom conversing.

The jury resumes deliberations Wednesday at 9 a.m.

Jean Casarez, In Session correspondent

Filed under: Beheading Trial • Jean Casarez • Trials • Verdict Watch


Share this on:
s jones   April 15th, 2008 7:08 pm ET

Will Alex Letkemans second degree murder sentence stay if the jury finds Orlewicz with something less than second degree murder since he was only the helper?

Lisa Adams   April 15th, 2008 7:17 pm ET

This is very interesting. It leads me to believe that the jury is leaning toward a guilty verdict in the case. Of course, I thought OJ was guilty so you never know with juries! I just hope the jury is being logical. To my thinking it is not logical that Alex Letkemann would accept 20-30 years if it really was self-defense. I have been rivited to this case from the beginning.

Angie Urena   April 15th, 2008 8:03 pm ET

I was horrified to hear Alex Letkemann’s testimony, I felt myself getting physically ill hearing him describe all that happened. The lack of emotion from both Letkemann and Orlewicz is unbelievable! I dont know any of them, yet I had more emotion that both of them put together. It is very disturbing that young men like this are walking among us.

Just wondering   April 15th, 2008 8:21 pm ET

Will any of the choices affect the deal that the friend made? Alex? It seems to me that he shouldnt have to do more time than the person who actually committed the act of murder. Did I get the facts correct? did they say that Alex had nothing to do with the crime until the moment it happened in the garage and then with the clean up and disposal, which to me wouldnt be a life sentence of 20-30? Can he change his plea deal and go to trial? I dont think he would get more than 20 years if he did. Im not sure why, but I feel that this boy got a raw deal. Jean Perre just seems to be evil in his premeditation and the other boy doesnt.

Skeptic   April 15th, 2008 8:29 pm ET

It appears some jurors are having sympathy for the creep’s young age. Well, set him free and he may help removing more thugs from the society.

jason   April 15th, 2008 8:31 pm ET

It was interesting to hear J.P’s mature voice in contrast with his “babyface” when he finally took the stand. Early on in his testimony I thought that some of the things he claimed were making sense, but something wasn’t settling well with me. He claimed that Dan allegedly brandished his gun and aimed it at Alex Letkemann then he (J.P) attacked Dan from behind and stabbed him in the back in “self defense”. It just doesn’t make a whole lot of sense to me because J.P was the last one to enter the garage and could have been the 1st one out the door to escape and notify the authorities. The gun wasn’t being pointing at J.P initially, as he claims… so, would defending Alex from being shot be justification for killing Dan? sigh…

jean tanner   April 16th, 2008 12:43 pm ET

The baby face is guilty. He is pretending to be innocent and it shows through. You don’t stab and stab and sever the head, and have a party afterwards. People who are afraid of life go home and tell their parents or call 911 right there and then. These young kids are prime example of young folks who are spoiled rotten to the core and don’t care about others, but themselves.

mark   April 16th, 2008 2:02 pm ET

Unreal. The problem with juries is that they are made up of people, most of whom are idiots.

Lisa   April 16th, 2008 2:21 pm ET

This case makes me wish Michigan had the death penalty!

Whoshotjr8   April 16th, 2008 4:55 pm ET

If you know anything about law, you would know that Sorenson’s past has nothing to do with this case that is why the Judge wouldn’t allow it. Are you a lawyer do you know case law and the rules of the court? What I want to know is how a defense attorney sleeps at night having to represent a scumbag like this.

This kid did not act in self defense he beheaded a guy and lit him on fire. How is this self defense? This kid is manipulator, a liar, and a cold hearted killer.

My heart goes out to the Sorenson’s Family. No one should ever have go through something like this. I hope JP roits in hell and loses all his teeth.

Jacci Heuberger   April 16th, 2008 4:58 pm ET

The little creep JP is as quity as sin. I feel sorry for his parents, something is wrong there and they should not be punished but he should be throw in the pokey with a bunch of hard core convicts. He has no remorse, no tears, very cold little ass. Hard as it may be I would throw him in jail and throw away the key. He is a smart ass and will be until bubba sets him straight.

Dave   April 16th, 2008 5:04 pm ET

Guilty On All Charges i knew deep in my heart that he would be found guilty… thank you GOD For guideing the jury to find Dans Killer guilty Now may,12,08 the judge will give him life x3 Rest In Peace Dan/Cous….

Gemma   April 16th, 2008 5:07 pm ET

Aubree,

The killing had nothing to do with his criminal history. If it had been allowed in, that would have been the same as sanctioning vigilanty justice. While I don’t think this guy was worth saving, it scares me more to think of vigilanty justice.

john   April 16th, 2008 5:08 pm ET

Well Aubree and Cathy you thought wrong. The little mafia wanna be was found guilty on all charges. Hope he likes prison food because thats all he will be eating for the rest of his life.

Lisa   April 16th, 2008 5:11 pm ET

I believe all these boys know the differance of right from wrong. I feel J.P. does need to atone for murdering someone, let alone Sawing the body”s head off, and mutilation. I don”t believe incarcerating him for his whole life is the way to go. He seems to really, truely believe Dan was is a thug. It just seems much of todays youth is disattached with society. They play these crazy killing electronic games and are given computers to do whatever, whenever they want. All unsupervised. It just seems things like this will only just get worse.

Jennifer   April 16th, 2008 5:11 pm ET

Lock them ALL UP, and throw away the key!

Sepi   April 16th, 2008 5:12 pm ET

The judge is so on the prosecution’s side, it’s amazing!!!

Kim   April 16th, 2008 5:14 pm ET

I believe the defense in the Jean Pierre Orlewicz case. I believe he killed Dan out of self defense and then mutilated his body out of duress. He needs to be acquitted and then that boy needs to be left alone! Sending him to prison for the rest of his life IS NOT JUSTICE!

And it would seem that everyone on “In Session” has been on the prosecutions side since day 1, which isn’t right at all.

Our justice system is a joke. Jean Pierre Orlewicz being found guilty and put in prison for the rest of his life, like I said before, IS NOT JUSTICE, in ANY sense of the word.

K.Celina.   April 16th, 2008 5:17 pm ET

WOW !!!!!
I knew from the beginning, that people are not smart in this case !!!!!
They looked at only result and testimony of the friends, but they didn’t take to a seriou look at the connection of an ADULT men 27 yrs old and his treat to the teenage boy !!!!!
Where is USA JUSTICE !!!! VICTIM was PREDITOR !!!!!
BAD REPUTATION was in the record of Mr Sorenson !!!!NOT THE BOY !!!!
POOR !!!!, not smart look at the circumstances !!!!!
I feel so sorry for Families of these KIDS !!!!!

nik   April 17th, 2008 1:34 pm ET

just wondering…even if its all done and set…why is a known sex offender hanging around a 17 year old kid…isnt that against the law? or is it different there?? just wondering if he was trying to get in trouble again or what????

Marilyn Cheney   April 17th, 2008 1:42 pm ET

They were so stupid, have they never learned that death is forever. I think that JP is a spoiled rotten child, he treats his parents without respect. While on the stand during the trial he spoke to the attorneys, like a punk, and showed lack of respect. Just so very dissapointing for so many young men.

Geneva   April 17th, 2008 10:28 pm ET

Justice has been served - GUILTY.

Leave Your Comment


 

Comments are moderated by CNN, in accordance with the CNN Comment Policy, and may not appear on this blog until they have been reviewed and deemed appropriate for posting. Also, due to the volume of comments we receive, not all comments will be posted.


subscribe RSS Icon
About this blog

Sidebar takes you behind the scenes of the day's legal headlines with breaking news and in-depth analysis from In Session's anchors and correspondents.

Contributors
Ashleigh Banfield
Co-anchor of the daily trial program Banfield and Ford: Courtside
Ashleigh Banfield
Jack Ford
A former prosecutor and co-anchor of the daily trial program Banfield & Ford: Courtside
Jack Ford
Lisa Bloom
Anchor of the daily trial program Lisa Bloom: Open Court
Lisa Bloom
Jami Floyd
Former defense attorney and anchor of her own daily program Jami Floyd: Best Defense
Jami Floyd
Fred Graham
Senior Editor Fred Graham covers legal news in Washington, D.C.
Fred Graham
Jean Casarez
Attorney Jean Casarez covers trials around the country
Jean Casarez
Beth Karas
Former prosecutor Beth Karas covers trials around the country
Beth Karas
Categories
CNN Comment Policy: CNN encourages you to add a comment to this discussion. You may not post any unlawful, threatening, libelous, defamatory, obscene, pornographic or other material that would violate the law. Please note that CNN makes reasonable efforts to review all comments prior to posting and CNN may edit comments for clarity or to keep out questionable or off-topic material. All comments should be relevant to the post and remain respectful of other authors and commenters. By submitting your comment, you hereby give CNN the right, but not the obligation, to post, air, edit, exhibit, telecast, cablecast, webcast, re-use, publish, reproduce, use, license, print, distribute or otherwise use your comment(s) and accompanying personal identifying information via all forms of media now known or hereafter devised, worldwide, in perpetuity. CNN Privacy Statement.
Home  |  World  |  U.S.  |  Politics  |  Crime  |  Entertainment  |  Health  |  Tech  |  Travel  |  Living  |  Business  |  Sports  |  Time.com
Podcasts  |  Blogs  |  CNN Mobile  |  Preferences  |  Email Alerts  |  CNN Radio  |  CNN Shop  |  Site Map
© 2008 Cable News Network LP, LLLP. A Time Warner Company. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by WordPress.com