In Session: Sidebar  « Back to Blog Main
March 30, 2008
Posted: 09:45 AM ET

NEW YORK – So Phil Spector wants a new judge for his new trial, does he?

ALT TEXT

Ashleigh Banfield thinks Phil Spector should stop blaming others for his predicament.

The latest figure to be blamed for everything that’s wrong with Spector’s wilting life is the Honorable Judge Larry Paul Fidler, who patiently presided over his trial for five long months last year.

It seems Mr. Spector doesn’t think the good judge was good enough.

But Spector’s complaints don’t end there, nor do his efforts to dole out blame for his miserable lot and defame all those involved.

It wasn’t good enough that his first trial ended with a hung jury.

It wasn’t good enough that his own lawyers secured him that deadlock, because he’s gone ahead and replaced every single one of them.

It wasn’t good enough that Spector besmirched Lana Clarkson’s memory while insisting during his defense that she simply shot herself in the mouth while waiting to leave his California mansion, purse slung over her shoulder.

It wasn’t good enough that he cast aspersions upon five women who had their deep, dark and embarrassing secrets unearthed during the prosecution’s case because they, too, had looked down the barrel of Phil Spector’s various guns while trying to end a bad date with him.

It wasn’t good enough that the renowned forensic scientist, Dr Henry Lee, came to Spector’s defense, because Spector’s own incessant legal wrangling caused Lee’s credibility to be thrashed in court.

It wasn’t good enough that Spector’s immigrant driver offered no embellishment when recounting seeing Spector with blood on his hand, holding a gun, and saying “I think I just killed somebody.” Instead, Adriano De Souza offered only the facts, and no more, even though he was so afraid for his own life he sped out of the driveway while dialing police. Spector’s reaction? This military veteran who excelled in advanced English classes had his reputation reduced to that of a dumb fool who doesn’t know guns, and doesn’t speak English well enough to be believed.

If all that weren’t enough, it’s now it’s the judge’s fault that Spector didn’t get everything he’s used to having — a room full of sycophantic people who tell him he can do (and has done) no wrong.

Bring on round two, whoever the judge may be. It only takes one person to hang a jury, and for a fleeting instant, that’s exactly what Spector got. One man — Juror Number 10 — who for some reason bought into Spector’s expensive defense.

It’s unlikely the music legend will see this chorus repeated.

Even though Spector just keeps spending his way out of a giant, roiling, wake of broken people, defamed professionals, jilted lawyers, weak arguments and disappointed music lovers, the evidence is what it is.

Message to Mr. Music: Here’s what’s up, Pussycat. Your nine legal lives are almost over.

Ashleigh Banfield, In Session anchor

Filed under: Ashleigh Banfield • Phil Spector


Share this on:
Micquie   March 30th, 2008 2:59 pm ET

Awesome commentary, Ashleigh!
When will it sink in that everyone who has aligned themselves with this lying has-been gets burned in the end? I anxiously await Phil Spector’s conviction in this case. I think he’s hoping that he dies of old age before he has to sleep through another trial.

brittany   March 30th, 2008 3:56 pm ET

great article!!my thoughts exactly!Bravo!!!

Joyce   March 30th, 2008 6:05 pm ET

Ashley, I watched every day of that trial and no one could have asked for more professional individuals and a more professional manner than that of the prosecutor and judge. The defense on the other hand was, shall we say, trying to be theatrical, like they were auditioning for a TV spot. I believe one of them was too. They failed miserably, of course. However, if one wants to accurately summarize those months and highlight the key points, one only has to read your commentary. It was truly perfect. I am also ready for Round 2. I think the “big man”, and I use the term jokingly since that’s all in his head, is in for a big surprise. The lady deserves justice, and I believe it will prevail.

east coast barrister   March 30th, 2008 6:45 pm ET

As a trial lawyer,I certainly understand all the work put forth by the Spector team - indeed, one should expect herculean efforts by advocates sworn to zealously defend. Ashleigh’s observations are well-founded and her ultimate proffered fate for the Defendant would likely be considered prophetic save the one trump card the defense seems destined to retain - the venue. Throughout the first trial it was noted over and over again: a celebrity’s chances of being convicted after trial in a California courtroom routinely appear almost remote. One is compelled to consider that in the face of both a long standing history with California juries and celebs as well as the experiences sustanied in this prosecution whether a conviction is truly obtainable.

Janice Addington   March 30th, 2008 7:04 pm ET

This is why I am a great fan of yours, Ashleigh. Exactly my thoughts on PS.

Lisa Hamilton   March 30th, 2008 8:10 pm ET

Once again, Ashleigh, you say it exactly like it is!!!!

Phil Spector is unlikely to get a judge nearly as patient….if for no other reason, because this judge will be privy to Spector’s “I can buy my way out of anything” attitude.

TruTV/CNN is lucky to have such a brilliant, genuine, funny anchor! I love your show!

dawn   March 30th, 2008 8:22 pm ET

I couldn’t agree with you more and I think he should have the same judge. He doesn’t take any crap from Spector or his wife. Thanks for expressing this much better than I ever could. You definitely have a way with words!

Jeanne   March 30th, 2008 9:01 pm ET

When I read about Phil Spector wanting a new judge the other day, I could find no commentary about it until today. I’m anxiously awaiting the next trial, hoping that Judge Fidler and Alan Jackson will be there.

Every time I think about Juror Number 10 I get angry all over again. I firmly believe that he actually wanted to hang up the jury no matter what, didn’t want to be identified, and had the audacity to say that he would welcome calls from the attorneys. But for him Phil Spector would be in prison where he belongs.

Way to go Ashleigh! You did a great job!

gmiller   March 31st, 2008 2:25 am ET

Thanks for the commentary Ashleigh. I completely agree as I usually do with you. It is hoped that this most recent delay will be his last and that he will be going to trial once again very soon.

Della   March 31st, 2008 3:43 am ET

Right on, Ashleigh!!
As FELLOW CANADIAN GAL, it’s nice to see you spent your Manitoba winters empowering your brain. I send my compliments to you for being our “layperson” on ther panel.
I cannot believe the “string of defense” witnesses Spector had, or how ONE holdout juror sent this fiasco into a retrial. How Spector lost some of his defense withnesses was a relief to me; I admire Dr.Baden immensily even though I do not always agree with him; (Such as in the Ted Binion/Sandra Murphy case in Las Vegas.) And if Dr. Henry Lee is supposed to be testifying for your defense…. and then does not… HUGE red flag IMO!
It’ll be interesting to see if Mr. Spector can BUY himself a not guilty verdict or a lesser conviction. I guess if that is the case, we can only hope for a civil procedure for wrongful death!

Again, from one Canuck gal to another, keep up the great work!!!

Della in Vancouver, British Columbia

Edward Lozzi   March 31st, 2008 6:43 am ET

Ashleigh, This commentary hit almost every nail on the head in Spector’s coffin. It was wonderful. However, I wish you could of been more assertive and wonderful from your anchor chair on Court TV during the trial. But this makes up for it. Those of us who knew Lana well and the inside facts of the lawyering tactics of “Team Spector”, know that over 50 to 100 people came forward to sign affidavits that Spector pulled loaded guns on them over a 40 +year period. That included stars like Michelle Phillips and Debbie Harry. A law suit by the LA Times was the only reason that Judge Fidler allowed five of them to testify. That’s better than nothing. Many close to Lana also know that a lot of the reason an exhausted girl would give into Spector’s constant baiting to go back to his party house was more about pressure from her manegment at the House of Blues to rectify a bad greeting incident when he showed up there at closing time. She felt bad about it. House of Blues managers even testified to this at the trial telling her to “treat him golden!” She had just stared out.

Your commentary was a breath of fresh air in the stale and regurgitated media coverage which mainly focuses on the career highlights of the accused murderer Spector, and less than on that of actress, comedian, producer Lana Clarkson. Edward Lozzi, former publicist and long time friend of Lana Clarkson

Adrienne lemons   March 31st, 2008 7:18 am ET

ashleigh, WELL SAID, PERFECT, RIGHT ON!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Ellen   March 31st, 2008 7:41 am ET

I now call Ashleigh “Tell it like it is Ashleigh” You rock!

Alan Clayman   March 31st, 2008 10:27 am ET

I think the general public would love to see at least one “super rich” person get the justice he deserves. We have seen just too many OJs and such. Alan Clayman

Icy   March 31st, 2008 11:24 am ET

Encore! (Lights lighter and raises it in air enthusiasticly)

Garry   March 31st, 2008 11:49 am ET

Tell it like it is!

Teresa   March 31st, 2008 11:53 am ET

Ashleigh, you say it how it is. This man, if you could call him a man, should be held accountable for all the crimes he has committed against women over a period of many years and who has seemly gotten away with it. I think Mr. Spector’s ego should be knocked down to what it really is. “A Parasite taking up valuable space on Earth!”

Donald   March 31st, 2008 12:40 pm ET

Ashleigh
This is such a well-written and informative article that I have nothing to add. You did a great job.
Bravo!

Laurie -- CA   March 31st, 2008 2:46 pm ET

Wow !! It’s about time somebody said what many, many people are thinking.

Thanks,

Laurie — CA

Nancy   March 31st, 2008 3:59 pm ET

I totally agree, Ashleigh! When is Spector’s next trial supposed to start?

Bethann   March 31st, 2008 4:26 pm ET

Thank you Ashleigh! You said so many things I scream at my tv and laptop. I thought judge fidler was pretty understanding during the trial. If I were the judge medicine or not he would have sit up and conducted himself better and his trouble making bratty child bride probably would have been removed and not given so many breaks. And that No: 10 juror gave me a Dr. Phil moment WHAT WERE YOU THINKING! Hopefully next time there will be justice for Lana. God Bless her and her famially. and also Dianne Ogden. P.S. Love you and Jack.

Joyce   March 31st, 2008 5:08 pm ET

Right on the money, Ashleigh!!

Cecil Gower   March 31st, 2008 5:45 pm ET

Great article. Its about time someone had the guts to say what needed to be said. You hit the bum right on. Juror # 10 should be ashamed. He probably was paid off.

Barbara   March 31st, 2008 7:43 pm ET

Yea Ashleigh! You could not have said it better! I pray for the day Phil Spector is escorted into prison!! I only wish there could be some punishment for the wife as well. The two of them all “cutesy” laughing at the helicopter flying overhead after the first trial.

tom keene   March 31st, 2008 8:50 pm ET

AMEN!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Anna   April 1st, 2008 10:24 am ET

Well said Ashleigh! I have no doubt at the next trial we will see a different outcome. Can’t wait to see the new legal team and Spector’s new hair style. Be interesting to also see what expert witnesses on both sides come up with this time with all the question as to their truthfulness of most the former experts. It’s a real shame that money can influence justice most the time.

Pay for your crime on earth or in the afterlife Mr Spector. You money and fancy lawyers won’t impress God in your final trial.

Nichol   April 1st, 2008 10:51 am ET

Totally agree. Great Article!

Amanda   April 1st, 2008 11:09 am ET

Thanks for finally saying what everyone who followed this trial knows for sure. I have no doubt that Phil Spector feels he can buy his way out of this. It’s about time someone gets some justice for Lana Clarkson.

buttegal   April 1st, 2008 12:53 pm ET

Excellent article, Ms. Banfield. I look forward to the day justice is REALLY served in this case.

Theresa   April 1st, 2008 12:58 pm ET

Excellent commentary Ashley. I completely agree with you and I believe that Phil Spector will get what he deserves in the end.

Kathryn   April 1st, 2008 6:53 pm ET

You are always articulate and continue to amaze me with your ability to analyze legal situations without being an attorney. I think Specter will finally get what he deserves in this next go-round. I have two questions in mind… how much $$$ will he have spent by the time he’s convicted…and how in this world will he survive prison?

Trish   April 1st, 2008 10:17 pm ET

I was totally offended by all the dirty tricks the defense engaged in. Vigorous defense of the client is one thing - gratuituous trashing to the victim is quite another. I suspect the male holdout juror believed that an actress at a stranger’s home deserved whatever the stranger wanted to do to her, and that the defense’s denegrating of Lana Clarkson could have been a salve to the conscience of someone who was voting in defiance of justice.

Jenn   April 2nd, 2008 12:32 pm ET

Well said Ashleigh!! He thinks just because he is a “celebrity” he make some demands. I wholeheartedly agree with you!!

Bosco   April 2nd, 2008 1:46 pm ET

YOU GO GIRL!!!!!!!!

Wayne   April 2nd, 2008 2:17 pm ET

Great commentary Ashleigh, you hit the nail right on the head with this one. I always look forward to watching your show, keep up the good work.

Debbie   April 6th, 2008 12:26 am ET

Ashleigh, that commentary was brilliant! I was very surprised that one juror bought Spector’s story. Nobody walks over to the door, takes a seat with their purse on their shoulder in an exit posture & then makes sexy with the gun (Spector’s original explanation) & accidently fires a round in their mouth with teeth closed blowing out front teeth. If you are attempting to seduce, give me a break, you take your purse off, along with other things…. right? Plus her teeth would have been open. It was obvious he was pulling his same exit routine when women try to leave him but this time it went too far & he killed her. If he did not have millions to back up his defense he would be in jail already.

Stephen   April 6th, 2008 10:03 am ET

Mr. Spector has done NONE of the things alleged by Ms. Banfield. It’s the work of his lawyers - who have a legal duty to provide Mr. Spector the most vigorous defense possible!

Further, it is doubtful Mr. Spector ‘dropped’ all his lawyers; more realistically they dropped him - as did noted criminal defense lawyer Robert Shapiro - who Mr. Spector is now suing to get his retainer money back.

It’s no secret Mr. Spector is a ‘client from hell’, and his lawyers have had enough of his garbage. Ms. Banfield, the only entity that should be given the wrath of society, is the California justice system - which requires a UNANIMOUS vote of guilt by 12 jurors - unlike most other states.

Mr. Spector’s lawyers simply did their job, which they had a legal obligation to do, otherwise they would face a malpractice suit.

Art Pomus   April 7th, 2008 1:11 am ET

Great to learn that you were that fly on the wall, who actually witnessed what happened. How come you didn’t testify?

You sneer at his million dollar defense team, but the prosecution spending $20 million was alright? Goliath vs. Goliath is a fair fight.

So what about the other gun-wave “victims”? If anything, waving a gun around 50 times without shooting anyone should .. . hint? suggest? … establish! that he never would actually shoot anyone.

One can’t help ‘besmirch’ the victim when there’s a clear chance that her impaired mindset (drunk, pilled up) caused the tragedy.

Jack Ca.   April 15th, 2008 9:43 am ET

Great article Ashleigh, Your a breath of fresh air.

Phil or Rachelle, if your reading think Lyle and Erik Mendez. I am.

Leave Your Comment


 

Comments are moderated by CNN, in accordance with the CNN Comment Policy, and may not appear on this blog until they have been reviewed and deemed appropriate for posting. Also, due to the volume of comments we receive, not all comments will be posted.


subscribe RSS Icon
About this blog

Sidebar takes you behind the scenes of the day's legal headlines with breaking news and in-depth analysis from In Session's anchors and correspondents.

Contributors
Ashleigh Banfield
Co-anchor of the daily trial program Banfield and Ford: Courtside
Ashleigh Banfield
Jack Ford
A former prosecutor and co-anchor of the daily trial program Banfield & Ford: Courtside
Jack Ford
Lisa Bloom
Anchor of the daily trial program Lisa Bloom: Open Court
Lisa Bloom
Jami Floyd
Former defense attorney and anchor of her own daily program Jami Floyd: Best Defense
Jami Floyd
Fred Graham
Senior Editor Fred Graham covers legal news in Washington, D.C.
Fred Graham
Jean Casarez
Attorney Jean Casarez covers trials around the country
Jean Casarez
Beth Karas
Former prosecutor Beth Karas covers trials around the country
Beth Karas
Categories
CNN Comment Policy: CNN encourages you to add a comment to this discussion. You may not post any unlawful, threatening, libelous, defamatory, obscene, pornographic or other material that would violate the law. Please note that CNN makes reasonable efforts to review all comments prior to posting and CNN may edit comments for clarity or to keep out questionable or off-topic material. All comments should be relevant to the post and remain respectful of other authors and commenters. By submitting your comment, you hereby give CNN the right, but not the obligation, to post, air, edit, exhibit, telecast, cablecast, webcast, re-use, publish, reproduce, use, license, print, distribute or otherwise use your comment(s) and accompanying personal identifying information via all forms of media now known or hereafter devised, worldwide, in perpetuity. CNN Privacy Statement.
Home  |  World  |  U.S.  |  Politics  |  Crime  |  Entertainment  |  Health  |  Tech  |  Travel  |  Living  |  Business  |  Sports  |  Time.com
Podcasts  |  Blogs  |  CNN Mobile  |  Preferences  |  Email Alerts  |  CNN Radio  |  CNN Shop  |  Site Map
© 2008 Cable News Network LP, LLLP. A Time Warner Company. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by WordPress.com