In Session: Sidebar  « Back to Blog Main
March 27, 2008
Posted: 12:58 PM ET

WEST PALM BEACH, Florida – The families of victims Linda Taylor, 56, and Cynthia Andrews, 49, have been waiting about a year and a half for this trial. Adam Gaillard, now 36, is charged with killing them when he lost control of his car on a bridge in Palm Beach County, Florida.

ALT TEXT

Adam Gaillard is accused of fleeing a fatal accident scene.

The crime he’s charged with is not vehicular homicide or involuntary manslaughter. He’s charged with failing to stop to render aid or, since aid would be futile in this case, to wait until authorities arrived so he could identify himself and offer what other information police would need. This is what the law requires. Watch a video wrap-up of the trial

Gaillard is not disputing that he swerved and lost control, but he says he never saw the women and has no idea that hit anyone. The state maintains he hit Taylor, but Gaillard says he had no idea it happened. So the issue for the jury will be whether Gaillard willfully and deliberately left the scene where he knew or should have known that he injured or killed someone.

It was about 6:00 a.m. on Sunday morning, September 24, 2006. Taylor and Andrews were walking on the Blue Heron Boulevard bridge (sometimes called the Singer Island bridge) that morning. It was still dark at about 6:00 a.m. but Taylor and Andrews routinely took early morning walks. Taylor wore a blinking red light on her shirt.

The two women properly walked westbound on the eastbound side; in other words, they faced oncoming traffic. Gaillard was driving eastbound over the bridge. He was alone and upset with his girlfriend. Seconds before the crash, he says he threw his cell phone and caught his hand or finger on the steering wheel. He lost control of the SUV and swerved off the road, onto the shoulder and then up the curb.

Gaillard sideswiped the bridge’s cement wall and veered back into the travel lane. As he swerved off the road, he struck Taylor, prosecutors say. She had been walking on the shoulder right next to the curb. Taylor was found about 20 feet away. She died at the scene.

Andrews had been walking on the sidewalk. She wasn’t struck but she was found 50 feet below the bridge on the beach. She, too, died at the scene. Andrews apparently was forced over the wall, possibly jumping to avoid Gaillard’s oncoming car, prosecutors say. Gaillard allegedly kept driving.

Gaillard blew out his two right tires. He had a big scrape on the passenger side of his vehicle. But he also had a dent on his hood. Was the dent caused by the impact with Taylor? If so, one asks, how did he not know that he hit at least one of the women? He has yet to offer an explanation.

On the advice of a friend and a lawyer, Gaillard turned himself in later that day and was interviewed by a detective more than 12 hours after the crash. By that time, it was too late to administer a breathalyzer test and no blood sample was voluntarily given, prosecutors say. With no evidence of impairment, there could be no DUI manslaughter charge.

Gaillard has always maintained that he was not drinking or using drugs that night. With no evidence of reckless driving (like speeding), there could be no vehicular homicide charge.

Gaillard was arrested on October 19, 2006. In addition to the second degree felony charge of leaving the scene of a fatal crash, he was charged with driving with a suspended license. The judge set bail at $50,000. He posted a bond and was released on condition that he not possess or consume alcohol and not use illegal drugs. He was also subjected to random drug tests. Within about a month, Gaillard flunked a drug test. He had cocaine in his system. Bail was revoked. He’s been sitting in a Palm Beach County jail since November 2006 awaiting this trial.

Beth Karas, In Session correspondent

Filed under: Beth Karas • Trials


Share this on:
Ann   March 27th, 2008 1:34 pm ET

Hi Ashleigh,

Maybe I missed it, but why was Adam Galliard in his car at that time of the morning? Where was he going or coming from? Thanks,

Ann

A Camp   March 27th, 2008 1:52 pm ET

I notice that the Blue Heron Bridge has a pedestrian walkway with a barrier in some places. Was a barrier present where the women where hit ?

Tony   March 27th, 2008 1:54 pm ET

Is Barney Fife prosecuting this case. The prosecution should rest before they ruin an EASY case!

laura ronan   March 27th, 2008 2:08 pm ET

regarding ashley”s comment regarding the police finding the vehicle so fast in such a large area, Palm Beach Shores is actually a small area og Singer Island, it is actually only about 10 blocks by six block area.

Melody, Portland Oregon   March 27th, 2008 2:26 pm ET

Could the State of Florida not found a better prosecutor for this case? She is awful and hurts the case for the families of these victims!

Dan Rodman   March 27th, 2008 3:07 pm ET

I must say I am disappointed in the prosecution this morning. The who, what, where WHEN and how is missing from her examination.

Rain   March 27th, 2008 4:20 pm ET

He’s going to hang for this one. You don’t blow out two tires and drive off unless you’ve got a reason to be afraid to be where you are. You don’t mess your car up that badly and not get out and assess the damage, I don’t care how angry you are at your girlfriend. His story, as presented here, is unlikely enough that he’s going to get nailed.

Also, there really should be some law on the books increasing the penalty for driving on a suspended license if you cause an injury or death, at least enough to put it on a par with driving under the influence, or allowing vehicular homicide charges. He shouldn’t have been behind the wheel in the first place, and if he’d obeyed the law, two women would still be alive.

Marcia Weiszmann   March 27th, 2008 4:42 pm ET

How many people will drive on a flat tire rather than changing it or calling for a tow truck if they don’t have a spare? I could understand if the defendant lived within a couple of blocks from the scene of the accident, but much further than that, don’t you run the risk of causing expensive damage to the rim?

Just wondering if this has been addressed and I missed it.

Catherine   March 27th, 2008 7:05 pm ET

What a sad a tragic accident for all of the victims! My heart goes out to the two women who died as well as the distracted young man driving that huge truck. Its so sad that accidents like this ruin so many peoples lives. I hope they pass a law banning cell phone use in moving vehicles - in every state!

Joan Kamen   March 28th, 2008 11:17 am ET

What is the appropriate time to report an accident? The police
didn t come looking for him, he turned himself in. if he reported the
accident in a shorter amount of time, would that have changed

the status of the victims?

Bev   March 28th, 2008 12:13 pm ET

Fine, so he claims he didn’t know he hit 2 people, if he’s THAT reckless a driver, then at least take his license away indefinitely, since he’s not going to be punished enough even if he gets 15 years, which he should.
And I really hope the family of these women sue him for everything in a civil suit.
Reckless drivers whether they were drinking or not have taken the lives of way too many innocent victims. Take your driving seriously…look at the road when you’re driving! What is so hard about that?
Another thing, why isn’t the prosecution calling to the fact that if Adam lived in the area and traveled that bridge at all, then he KNEW there could be pedestrians on it at any given time, day or night and so common sense would be to stop and see if you hit someone.
Lies are transparent, there are way to many in this case coming from the defendant.

N.Andujar   March 28th, 2008 12:32 pm ET

There is no way that he did not see or feel the bodies of these two poor woman. He is a coward and should be punished especially for leaving the scene of the accident.

NA, NYC

Jim   March 28th, 2008 1:11 pm ET

Are you kidding me, look at that vehicle. You do not drive anywhere if your rig looks like that, doesn’t matter what you hit. Unless you have something to hide.

Chatman on Singer Island   March 28th, 2008 1:12 pm ET

Hi A Camp:

That barrier you’ve noticed was actually constructed after this horrible accident. There was a toddler in a stroller killed five or six years before this at the same location (the mom was walking with a friend, and a car slammed into another car, pushing it into them) I used to run on this bridge, but have quit.

Tammy Ervin   March 28th, 2008 1:21 pm ET

Hi Ashleigh..4 years ago my son was changing his tire when a drunk driver hit him and kept on going, he also said he did not know he hit someone,he left the scene, went and tried to fix his car..the police found him 8 hours later and arrested him..long enough for the alcohol to clear..he was on parole and had three moving violations in the 7 months he was out on parole..he plead guilty to aggravated vehicular homicide, hit and run and tampering with evidence. he got three years for killing my son… so i am not a big believer of I didn’t know…

Keith   March 28th, 2008 1:50 pm ET

I think it is entirely possible to be unaware of hitting a person while being involved in an accident. How could one possibly be aware of hitting something “soft”, like a human body, while slamming into something hard, like a wall. It appears as if there is a segregated pedestrian walkway. If that’s the case, why would he even consider the fact that someone might be walking in the roadway?

Karen FL.   March 28th, 2008 1:56 pm ET

I think that unless you’ve ran someone over or even hit a person before, you will not know how it feels. His truck is a suburban which can be quite tall. I think the defense is in good shape this time. The state has the burden to prove it and has not done so.

Mike   March 28th, 2008 1:58 pm ET

If this man is not convicted, it is the prosecutions fault. That vehicle was severely wrecked and anyone sober, as he claims he was, would not drive away! His past speaks volumes on why he didn’t contact the police right away as well.

Jane   March 28th, 2008 2:02 pm ET

I lived in Palm Beach County and know this bridge, I know the many speed substance abuse related accicdents that have occurred over the 16 years I ived there so whn I heard about this accident I, like many, thought ‘SLAM DUNK’, for the prosecution. Now I am not so sure. The defense has raised issues that make me think that, ” yes an accident occurred’, BUT no criminal intent. I am now more inclined to side with the defense. Very hard for me to admit since I am usually on the prosecution side.

Calderon,Jesus   March 28th, 2008 2:05 pm ET

I’m back and frustrated.I just heard he damaged his truck anyone who has a so-called accident that damages their truck would stop to check the damages unless they knew that they might have hit someone or something and wanted to ge out of there quick out of fear

Sandi W   March 28th, 2008 2:23 pm ET

Maybe I’ve missed this part, but did he actually hit both victims with his SUV which in turn caused their death or did they jump off the side of the bridge to avoid being hit by the SUV and sustain their injuries due to jumping off the bridge?

Connie Falcon   March 28th, 2008 3:03 pm ET

I agree with Marcia W. I don’t know anyone who would hit a bridge and have two flat tires that would continue on and not stop to access the damage you did. Yes, riding on the rim would cause significant more damage. I at least know that one! He obviously had something to hide!

JULIE AND DIANA   March 28th, 2008 6:00 pm ET

Our sister was a victim of a tragic accident and she barely survived. After 2 years plus, in and out of hospitals and Nursinghomes, we were able to bring her home. Linda Taylor was our first caregiver for 13 months, until she was killed on Singer Bridge. Linda was loved by our family and she was such a very special person. We miss her very much. Wedo not know the outcome of this court case, but we have always questioned why the man that hit her never was subjected to blood testing, even 13 hours later would show something! I am sure that he did not do this willingly but we are all responsible for our actions and justice should prevail. His life is ruined and the families of both ladies will suffer over his actions for the rest of their lives.
How sad.

sam cleveland ohio   March 29th, 2008 11:27 am ET

why have his friend ed on the stand at all? the attorney answered all the questions.
he simply affirmed like a puppet.

A Camp   March 30th, 2008 10:33 am ET

Thanks….. Chatman on Singer Island …….for your answer about the pedestrian walkway . The bridge does look pretty dangerous for pedestrians . Unfortunately !

Ham   March 31st, 2008 12:35 pm ET

The flight response is normal… the fact that he turned himself in later will go a long way to help him…

Sad Sad accident for sure…

But if these actions were good enough for Ted Kennedy… why not this guy…

Goody   March 31st, 2008 2:30 pm ET

One could argue that because this individual was driving on a suspended license that that would be enough to give him the fear necessary to leave the scene of his accident. One could use this argument to bolster the claim that this individual did not know he had killed two women. But no matter how you argue why this individual left the scene you can not get around the fact that this Gaillard was driving in violation of the law. As a result of driving in violation of the law two women were killed. I don’t know about anyone else but the way i see this situation, its much like being charged with murder because a person died as a result of a bank robbery. The bank robber may not have intended for anyone to die, but death resulted none the less as a result of his or her crime. Gaillard chose to drive on a suspended liscence and as a result of that choice two women died. My question is this: given that Gaillard chose to drive on a suspended liscence, and his choice led to the death of two women, how is he not charged with at least manslaughter?

Chatman on Singer Island   April 1st, 2008 10:55 am ET

Julie and Diana: I am so sorry, and my hearts go out to the Taylor and Andrews families as well. They have really displayed a lot of class.

5 years…I’m trying to keep an open mind, but this is disgusting.

How can the authorities permanently keep this guy from getting behind a wheel once he’s out? We know how well suspending his license has worked in the past.

Bobbie   April 4th, 2008 7:55 am ET

I agree. five years for killing two people dos not seem appropriate. He did not stop because he knew he broke the law and did not want to get caught,

monica   April 6th, 2008 12:51 am ET

This case is going to send a message:

“If you kill someone with your car, because you are driving on a suspended license, and may or may not be DUI, RUN - your penalty for fleeing the scene will be easier than if you stuck around and the cops were able to test you for illegal substances/elevated BAC.”

This is so sad. Two innocent women were killed, and this guy will MAYBE get 5 years?????? That is seriously nuts. He killed them. He should get vehicular homicide charges, regardless of whether or not they have evidence of alcohol/drugs. He killed them with his car. He should not be let off the hook, simply because he gave himself time to sober up.

Leave Your Comment


 

Comments are moderated by CNN, in accordance with the CNN Comment Policy, and may not appear on this blog until they have been reviewed and deemed appropriate for posting. Also, due to the volume of comments we receive, not all comments will be posted.


subscribe RSS Icon
About this blog

Sidebar takes you behind the scenes of the day's legal headlines with breaking news and in-depth analysis from In Session's anchors and correspondents.

Contributors
Ashleigh Banfield
Co-anchor of the daily trial program Banfield and Ford: Courtside
Ashleigh Banfield
Jack Ford
A former prosecutor and co-anchor of the daily trial program Banfield & Ford: Courtside
Jack Ford
Lisa Bloom
Anchor of the daily trial program Lisa Bloom: Open Court
Lisa Bloom
Jami Floyd
Former defense attorney and anchor of her own daily program Jami Floyd: Best Defense
Jami Floyd
Fred Graham
Senior Editor Fred Graham covers legal news in Washington, D.C.
Fred Graham
Jean Casarez
A correspondent covering trials around the country
Jean Casarez
Beth Karas
A correspondent covering trials around the country
Beth Karas
Categories
CNN Comment Policy: CNN encourages you to add a comment to this discussion. You may not post any unlawful, threatening, libelous, defamatory, obscene, pornographic or other material that would violate the law. Please note that CNN makes reasonable efforts to review all comments prior to posting and CNN may edit comments for clarity or to keep out questionable or off-topic material. All comments should be relevant to the post and remain respectful of other authors and commenters. By submitting your comment, you hereby give CNN the right, but not the obligation, to post, air, edit, exhibit, telecast, cablecast, webcast, re-use, publish, reproduce, use, license, print, distribute or otherwise use your comment(s) and accompanying personal identifying information via all forms of media now known or hereafter devised, worldwide, in perpetuity. CNN Privacy Statement.
Home  |  World  |  U.S.  |  Politics  |  Crime  |  Entertainment  |  Health  |  Tech  |  Travel  |  Living  |  Business  |  Sports  |  Time.com
Podcasts  |  Blogs  |  CNN Mobile  |  Preferences  |  Email Alerts  |  CNN Radio  |  CNN Shop  |  Site Map
© 2008 Cable News Network LP, LLLP. A Time Warner Company. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by WordPress.com