In Session: Sidebar  « Back to Blog Main
March 10, 2008
Posted: 02:54 PM ET

Like Anna Nicole Smith, Heath Ledger died young and left behind a will that failed to provide for his baby daughter. Both of them drafted their wills before their little girls were conceived or even contemplated.

ledger

Matila Ledger’s name and foot imprints outside the Ledger residence in New York.

Anna Nicole’s will, inexplicably, specifically excluded any future children she might have, leaving everything to her son Daniel. Daniel died before Anna Nicole, and she never updated her will, leaving her legal affairs in chaos at her death.

Heath Ledger’s will was drafted in Australia, but at least parts of it will be administered in New York, which frowns upon cutting children out of a parent’s estate unless it’s done explicitly. Ledger’s will was written in 2003, before he met Michelle Williams and had a baby with her, Matilda. Matilda will now need to contest the will, arguing that his failure to update his will was an oversight.

This is a good reminder to all of us to update our wills after a major life event – marriage, divorce, death of a loved one, birth of a child, even moving or buying or selling significant assets.

Lisa Bloom, In Session anchor

Filed under: Lisa Bloom


Share this on:
Laura Johnson   March 10th, 2008 3:55 pm ET

This is exactly why updateing your will and estate is so IMPORTANT. I don’t even have kids and I update mine yearly.

Steve S.   March 11th, 2008 7:48 am ET

I couldnt agree more!!!!

L Young   March 11th, 2008 2:01 pm ET

Also, be very specific in your will as to your wishes. DO NOT SAY divide equally among heirs what a crock!!! The worst comes out in those who think they are being slighted!

Braden Pollock   March 11th, 2008 4:19 pm ET

Note to self:
1.Update will.
2. Become famous.

Rain   March 12th, 2008 8:31 am ET

Why the assumption that the will will need to be contested? Ledger’s family has stated that they know that he would have wanted his daughter taken care of, and that they will do so. Obviously, I don’t know if they mean “we’ll set half of everything aside in a trust for her,” or “we’ll toss her twenty bucks a week,” or something in between, but, how ’bout we give ‘em the benefit of the doubt and see what happens, first?

cincin   March 13th, 2008 7:24 pm ET

Yeah, my mean old mother-in-law left one of her grandchildren her house, and my two sons (ages 25 and 11) NOTHING. Why? She “forgot.” Did we contest? No, but we should have. My 25 year old son is trying to pay back $40,000 in student loans while his college drop-out cousin and her husband live in a free million dollar home near the water in Northern California.

cincin   March 13th, 2008 7:27 pm ET

When my mother was given 7 days to live back in May 2006, I asked her to hand write out a will. We thought she probably had one, but we couldn’t find it. She did a great job on it. We closed probate in December 2007 with no legal problems whatsoever. May she rest in peace.

Ron   March 13th, 2008 11:24 pm ET

If You Have a will , It is your responsibility to keep it upgraded. but even if you don’t , The court should know that a father or mother would never intentionally leave a MINOR child out of a will. Its different for an adult child. They can work and make their own way. Of course then you have idiots who leave millions to a cat !!! or dog!!! It doesnt take a genius to settle a will, lawyers just try to make it hard because they get paid as long as it is tied up in court. common sence should be the law in defining a will.

***   March 14th, 2008 10:42 am ET

You CAN’T just “give them the benefit of the doubt” and see what happens because then the money is legally someone else’s, with no restrictions on what they do with it. Sure, we would hope they would provide for Matilda, but they don’t HAVE to, and there is no way to go back and say “we made a mistake give the money back to Matilda”. Any attorney for Matilda is ethically bound to contest that will and act in her best interest, and “seeing what happens” is definitely NOT in her best interests.

Ed   March 14th, 2008 12:36 pm ET

Why not enforce wills As Written? No matter what someone Says ‘they know’ the deceased wanted after the fact. The reality is that most of them have an agenda to acquire some of the estate. Virtually none of them can claim true altruism in the court, even if they don’t benefit directly.

No-One, relative, lawyer, or the state itself, should be able to change Any will unless there is a specific debt unadressed, and even then it should require a judge’s approval and be painful and expensive to discourage would-be thieves.

Timothy Bellavia   August 26th, 2008 11:48 am ET

I love watching your show; especially when Dr Buzz appears. He is funny, insiteful, and very handsome.

Leave Your Comment


 

Comments are moderated by CNN, in accordance with the CNN Comment Policy, and may not appear on this blog until they have been reviewed and deemed appropriate for posting. Also, due to the volume of comments we receive, not all comments will be posted.


subscribe RSS Icon
About this blog

Sidebar takes you behind the scenes of the day's legal headlines with breaking news and in-depth analysis from In Session's anchors and correspondents.

Contributors
Ashleigh Banfield
Co-anchor of the daily trial program Banfield and Ford: Courtside
Ashleigh Banfield
Jack Ford
A former prosecutor and co-anchor of the daily trial program Banfield & Ford: Courtside
Jack Ford
Lisa Bloom
Anchor of the daily trial program Lisa Bloom: Open Court
Lisa Bloom
Jami Floyd
Former defense attorney and anchor of her own daily program Jami Floyd: Best Defense
Jami Floyd
Fred Graham
Senior Editor Fred Graham covers legal news in Washington, D.C.
Fred Graham
Jean Casarez
Attorney Jean Casarez covers trials around the country
Jean Casarez
Beth Karas
Former prosecutor Beth Karas covers trials around the country
Beth Karas
Categories
CNN Comment Policy: CNN encourages you to add a comment to this discussion. You may not post any unlawful, threatening, libelous, defamatory, obscene, pornographic or other material that would violate the law. Please note that CNN makes reasonable efforts to review all comments prior to posting and CNN may edit comments for clarity or to keep out questionable or off-topic material. All comments should be relevant to the post and remain respectful of other authors and commenters. By submitting your comment, you hereby give CNN the right, but not the obligation, to post, air, edit, exhibit, telecast, cablecast, webcast, re-use, publish, reproduce, use, license, print, distribute or otherwise use your comment(s) and accompanying personal identifying information via all forms of media now known or hereafter devised, worldwide, in perpetuity. CNN Privacy Statement.
Home  |  World  |  U.S.  |  Politics  |  Crime  |  Entertainment  |  Health  |  Tech  |  Travel  |  Living  |  Business  |  Sports  |  Time.com
Podcasts  |  Blogs  |  CNN Mobile  |  Preferences  |  Email Alerts  |  CNN Radio  |  CNN Shop  |  Site Map
© 2008 Cable News Network LP, LLLP. A Time Warner Company. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by WordPress.com