|
February 22, 2008
Posted: 11:39 AM ET
ELKHORN, Wisconsin – Jurors talked with the media after they found Mark Jensen guilty of first-degree murder in the 1998 poisoning death of his wife, Julie. They took us behind the jury room doors for a look at their nearly 32 hours of deliberations.
Jurors Wanita Erickson, left, and Cynthia Zuehlke, hug Julie Jensen’s brothers, Michael (left) and Paul Griffin.
Their initial vote was five for guilty, two for not guilty and five undecided. Reasonable doubt, they said, came from evidence the defense presented on Julie’s mental state. Several jurors believed she was depressed and possibly could have wanted to end her own life. Watch what swayed the jury Some jurors also believed Julie had to have some computer skills. But as they kept going through the evidence, several things stood out. First was Julie’s letter. They determined she was trying to say she would never voluntarily leave this earth. They then determined that it was Mark who did the computer searches, based the time they were done and the time “between” searches. Online Internet searches, along with brokerage telecom searches, were too close in time, jurors concluded, for Mark to sign off and Julie to then begin searching for ways to kill her. Jurors didn’t believe jailhouse snitch Aaron Dillard. In fact, they didn’t believe any of the prosecution’s jailhouse informants. They also did not believe Julie Jensen was suffocated at the end of her life. In unison they said that she died of “ethylene glycol poisoning.” Ethylene glycol is the main ingredient of antifreeze. Jurors said they didn’t rely on the science. The experts’ differing theories basically cancelled each other out, jurors said. Finally they said they came to their final verdict at 4 30 p.m. — the very same time in the afternoon that Julie’s body was found more than nine years ago. – Jean Casarez, In Session correspondent Filed under: Jean Casarez |
Contributors
Related Links
Categories
|
|
CNN Comment Policy: CNN encourages you to add a comment to this discussion. You may not post any unlawful, threatening, libelous, defamatory, obscene, pornographic or other material that would violate the law. Please note that CNN makes reasonable efforts to review all comments prior to posting and CNN may edit comments for clarity or to keep out questionable or off-topic material. All comments should be relevant to the post and remain respectful of other authors and commenters. By submitting your comment, you hereby give CNN the right, but not the obligation, to post, air, edit, exhibit, telecast, cablecast, webcast, re-use, publish, reproduce, use, license, print, distribute or otherwise use your comment(s) and accompanying personal identifying information via all forms of media now known or hereafter devised, worldwide, in perpetuity. CNN Privacy Statement.
|
|