In Session: Sidebar  « Back to Blog Main
February 19, 2008
Posted: 02:57 PM ET

ELKHORN, Wisconsin –- After six weeks of dramatic testimony, the jury is deciding whether Julie Jensen was murdered with poison slipped to her by her husband or took her own life.

ALT TEXT

Mark Jensen is accused of poisoning wife Julie with antifreeze.

Closing arguments in Wisconsin v. Mark Jensen were an all-day affair. The jurors intently listened to both sides without showing any emotion or bias toward either the state or the defense.

Special prosecutor Robert Jambois began the final arguments by telling jurors that now they can understand why Julie Jensen began telling her next door neighbors, Tad and Margaret Wojt, her thoughts and emotions, why she believed her husband was trying to kill her.

The prosecutor argued his points for about an hour and a half pointing to an email exchange on October 16, 1998 between Mark Jensen and Kelly LaBonte, the woman with whom he was having an affair.

They discussed taking a cruise and getting problems out of the way along with “details.” That same night on that same home computer were Internet searches for poison, botulism, mercury fulminate along with an intranet search of Mark’s employee directory. The name researched: John “Jock” Joseph, one of Kelly LaBonte’s previous lovers.

Finally the prosecutor argued that Mark left a sleeping Julie to go to the doctor on December 2 1998 to get the sleeping pill Ambien. That sleeping pill truly immobilized her, Jambois told the jury, so Mark could get her to drink the antifreeze. He was her only caregiver at that point.

The defense spent much of its time focusing on con man Aaron Dillard, a key prosecution witness. Attorney Craig Albee portrayed Dillard as a professional at making things up. This was ticket out of a seven-year prison stint, Albee argued.

Mark Jensen had reports and transcripts of his April 1999 interview with the lead investigator. Dillard easily could have read that and made up his story, Albee reasoned.

Besides Dillard, the thrust of the defense argument centered on Julie herself — that she was sick, mentally depressed and did many things that were unknown at the time to Mark. Craig Albee told the jury Mark never knew Julie had called her next door neighbor on December 2, never saw her getting up to go to the bathroom and never saw evidence she had vomited.

Julie could have gotten on the computer during those final days – something else Mark just didn’t see, Albee said.

Mark Jensen’s loyal mother and father were in court for closing arguments but his sister, Laura, wasn’t. Nor was his wife, Kelly Jensen.

Julie’s four brothers continue their united front of loyalty to their sister. They have come from various parts of the country to sit here in this courtroom for the last seven weeks.

And finally the Jensen’s next door neighbors, Margaret and Tad Wojt are sitting in the back row on the prosecution’s side quietly listening to a death they have waited so long to understand. They told me we just had to come today, that the wait for answers has been too long.

Jean Casarez, In Session correspondent

Filed under: Jean Casarez • Verdict Watch


Share this on:
Jeanne   February 19th, 2008 3:17 pm ET

In the brief excerpts I viewed this morning of Mr. Jambois’ closing argument to the jury, it was very noticable that Mark Jensen wasn’t displaying his usual smirk and smugness that we’ve seen for weeks.

Janet   February 19th, 2008 4:08 pm ET

I think it speaks volumes that the present Mrs. Jensen was not in the courtroom in support of her husband.

Bella   February 19th, 2008 4:19 pm ET

I feel sorry for the jury taking this case now. I truly feel that the prosecution tried to put on a good case but they should have taken into consideration how good this Albee is he really planted alot of reasonable doubt in the prosecutions case. I believe he probably did poison her but then again if she was afraid of him and kept telling people that he wanted to kill her why didnt she just get a order of protection? Well shes dead so I guess we will never know.

Brenda   February 19th, 2008 4:47 pm ET

I thought the jury would be back sooner . Albee did make some good arguements, just didn’t replace good ole common sence. I feel bad for the kids. But we all know that Kelly Jensen want waste any time finding his replacement.

Katie   February 19th, 2008 5:04 pm ET

The volumes it speaks, current wife not being in court, she is most likely doing what she can in order to support herself and 3 children. I find the comments on the blogs and the chat boards kind of sad really. It is pretty obvious to me most of you have nothing more worthwhile to do in your lives than to prey upon other families who are hurting on both sides of the story.

Linda   February 19th, 2008 5:24 pm ET

Sometimes you can believe with your head and still have your heart not want to think your head is correct. I think that is what happened to Julie and it cost her dearly.

Judy Adams   February 20th, 2008 2:45 am ET

Although Albee fought a mighty fight, the defense case was lame and I think focusing most of his energy on disparaging Dillard was fatal.

Victoria   February 20th, 2008 5:05 am ET

After watching the biggest part of this trial and putting myself in the shoes of the jury, I wouldn’t be able to convict Mark Jensen. In my mind there is more than reasonable doubt. Take away the testimony of Aaron Dillard, and what do we have. Nothing really as far as I’m concerned. I don’t believe a word Aaron had to say.

Nona   February 20th, 2008 1:03 pm ET

Is there any indication that Kelly Jensen is occupied with another man?

Debbie   February 21st, 2008 9:32 am ET

I feel as though the prosecutor raised reasonable doubt. He came off as if he were grasping for straws.

cheryl   February 21st, 2008 4:36 pm ET

Maybe this would help you out a bit Janet……From what I heard today from the Kenosha Reporter is that Kelly Jensen has been raising Marks two sons plus the little boy that her and Mark have together, she is working to support them since there really isnt much money and the kids have that free lunch program at school…..I dont believe she’s with anyone else, they said she couldnt afford to sit in the court room everyday and not work…
I agree with Debbie 100% the prosecutor almost sounded as if he wanted to say nah nah nah nah nah all the time when he couldnt get his way with the witnesses…he was definetlyl grasping for straws with the penis testimony for one, who cares if the guy had a fetish for penis’ since when does that make someone a killer? and as for the dillard testimony, if the jury doesnt disregard that right from the time it left his lips then their not to bright, i think dillard pulled his biggest scam on jambois….albee did a fantastic job defending this guy, especially since the judge let the “letter from the grave in” how do you cross examine a letter? i for one could not convict based on what i heard i have way to much doubt…..if she was in such fear as claimed it only took one phone call, and she never dialed it.

Vee   February 21st, 2008 7:22 pm ET

I have followed this trial from the beginning and never felt like
Mark Jensen was NOT guilty. I never had a doubt because all
the information brought forward concerning his character and
his now wife!

Jambois’ was fantastic! VICTORY FOR JULIE! AMEN!

Leave Your Comment


 

Comments are moderated by CNN, in accordance with the CNN Comment Policy, and may not appear on this blog until they have been reviewed and deemed appropriate for posting. Also, due to the volume of comments we receive, not all comments will be posted.


subscribe RSS Icon
About this blog

Sidebar takes you behind the scenes of the day's legal headlines with breaking news and in-depth analysis from In Session's anchors and correspondents.

Contributors
Ashleigh Banfield
Co-anchor of the daily trial program Banfield and Ford: Courtside
Ashleigh Banfield
Jack Ford
A former prosecutor and co-anchor of the daily trial program Banfield & Ford: Courtside
Jack Ford
Lisa Bloom
Anchor of the daily trial program Lisa Bloom: Open Court
Lisa Bloom
Jami Floyd
Former defense attorney and anchor of her own daily program Jami Floyd: Best Defense
Jami Floyd
Fred Graham
Senior Editor Fred Graham covers legal news in Washington, D.C.
Fred Graham
Jean Casarez
Attorney Jean Casarez covers trials around the country
Jean Casarez
Beth Karas
Former prosecutor Beth Karas covers trials around the country
Beth Karas
Categories
CNN Comment Policy: CNN encourages you to add a comment to this discussion. You may not post any unlawful, threatening, libelous, defamatory, obscene, pornographic or other material that would violate the law. Please note that CNN makes reasonable efforts to review all comments prior to posting and CNN may edit comments for clarity or to keep out questionable or off-topic material. All comments should be relevant to the post and remain respectful of other authors and commenters. By submitting your comment, you hereby give CNN the right, but not the obligation, to post, air, edit, exhibit, telecast, cablecast, webcast, re-use, publish, reproduce, use, license, print, distribute or otherwise use your comment(s) and accompanying personal identifying information via all forms of media now known or hereafter devised, worldwide, in perpetuity. CNN Privacy Statement.
Home  |  World  |  U.S.  |  Politics  |  Crime  |  Entertainment  |  Health  |  Tech  |  Travel  |  Living  |  Business  |  Sports  |  Time.com
Podcasts  |  Blogs  |  CNN Mobile  |  Preferences  |  Email Alerts  |  CNN Radio  |  CNN Shop  |  Site Map
© 2008 Cable News Network LP, LLLP. A Time Warner Company. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by WordPress.com