In Session: Sidebar  « Back to Blog Main
February 15, 2008
Posted: 08:25 PM ET

CANTON, Ohio – Former Canton police officer Bobby Cutts Jr. could face the ultimate penalty, death, when the jury of six men and six women returns to the Stark County courthouse February 25 to hear more evidence and recommend a sentence for the murder of his pregnant ex-girlfriend, Jessie Davis, in June.

Jurors spent more than 20 hours over four days working through complex legal definitions and instructions before reaching unanimous verdicts Friday morning. Because the jury panel must return for the next phase, jurors couldn’t speak to the media about their decision.

When Judge Charles E. Brown Jr. read the first verdict — not guilty of aggravated murder in the death of Jessie Davis — some were hopeful, others disappointed.

Without a guilty verdict of aggravated murder, there was no possibility of a death sentence. Cutts was instead found guilty of the lesser charge of straight murder.

But the relief of Cutts’ family and the disappointment of Davis’ family were short-lived. Counts 2 and 3 were also aggravated murder charges and Cutts was found guilty of those two counts.

Moreover, the jury found him guilty of each of three “specifications” or circumstances under each of those counts, any one of which qualifies him for the death penalty. At the trial’s penalty phase, the same jurors will hear evidence from both sides as the prosecution argues for a death and the defense argues for a life sentence.

In finding Cutts guilty of straight murder and not the aggravated murder of Jessie Davis, jurors apparently believed that her death was intentional but that it did not occur during a burglary. Yet, in finding Cutts guilty of aggravated murder in intentionally terminating Davis’s pregnancy (Count 2), jurors found it did, indeed, occur during a burglary. So, the death of Davis was not during a burglary but that of the nearly full-term baby inside her was.

In Count 3, another verdict of guilty of aggravated murder, jurors found that Cutts killed a viable fetus — a person under the age of 13 — and, again, that it occurred during a burglary. The verdicts in these three counts seemed inconsistent to defense attorneys who asked for a mistrial based on that very point. Judge Brown denied the motion, saying the verdicts are not inconsistent because they pertain to different victims: Jessie Davis and Baby Chloe. We won’t know why the jurors reached these decisions until the penalty phase is completed, and only if jurors are willing to speak about it.

After court adjourned, family members of Davis and Cutts were escorted from the courthouse. Everyone refused to comment on the verdicts for now.

Beth Karas, In Session correspondent

Filed under: Beth Karas • Trials • Verdict!


Share this on:
Jodi   February 16th, 2008 2:08 am ET

I personally hope he dies for this…to father one child with this poor woman and stay in a relationship with her to father a second one lends you to believe he loved her at one time…and to kill her and the unborn baby now makes it all the more horrible, he Deserves Death!

suzanne xeloures   February 16th, 2008 12:25 pm ET

this whole story is tragic, not only is jessie and baby chloe dead, but what about the other 3 children he has left behind, they now have to live with knowing that there father has killed 2 people, and that they will probably never see him again. there future of having there dad at there (life’s events) are over. In all everyone is the loser in this, the family’s will always have an empty space at all gatherings, and never have the life they so deserved, i truly hope both sides can move on now and give the love these children so much will need, and hopefully Mr. Cutts now that this part is determined that he is guilty, will take his sentence, and not do all the bull with appeals, etc. let everyone heal, and move on for the sake of family, and especially the children.

Butch   February 17th, 2008 8:15 am ET

I commend the jury for seeing through the defense smokescreen. This was truly a egocentric defendant who felt that whatever he did in life was okay. My heart and thoughts go out to the surviving children and the family of the victims.

Tim   February 17th, 2008 12:15 pm ET

I would also favor the death penalty in this case, even though I typically oppose the death penalty in most other cases.

Linda Singleton   February 20th, 2008 3:45 pm ET

I was so happy the jury came back with the right verdict. It amazes me how these guys kill, but don’t want to die themselves. How he could even justify killing the mother and then leaving a child to fend for himself why he proceeded to deceive the public and the law, and elicited another person to help him hide his crime, she being too stupid to realize they wouldn’t get away with it, and him believing that he would get away with it. The child saw him kill his mother and was smart enough to tell where his mother was. What kind of an animal is he? … not only to not have compassion for the woman, but no compassion for a viable baby that was breathing and ready to come into the world. If you can’t or don’t want to pay child support, then keep your pants zipped. I hope he is given what should come to him.

Leave Your Comment


 

Comments are moderated by CNN, in accordance with the CNN Comment Policy, and may not appear on this blog until they have been reviewed and deemed appropriate for posting. Also, due to the volume of comments we receive, not all comments will be posted.


subscribe RSS Icon
About this blog

Sidebar takes you behind the scenes of the day's legal headlines with breaking news and in-depth analysis from In Session's anchors and correspondents.

Contributors
Ashleigh Banfield
Co-anchor of the daily trial program Banfield and Ford: Courtside
Ashleigh Banfield
Jack Ford
A former prosecutor and co-anchor of the daily trial program Banfield & Ford: Courtside
Jack Ford
Lisa Bloom
Anchor of the daily trial program Lisa Bloom: Open Court
Lisa Bloom
Jami Floyd
Former defense attorney and anchor of her own daily program Jami Floyd: Best Defense
Jami Floyd
Fred Graham
Senior Editor Fred Graham covers legal news in Washington, D.C.
Fred Graham
Jean Casarez
Attorney Jean Casarez covers trials around the country
Jean Casarez
Beth Karas
Former prosecutor Beth Karas covers trials around the country
Beth Karas
Categories
CNN Comment Policy: CNN encourages you to add a comment to this discussion. You may not post any unlawful, threatening, libelous, defamatory, obscene, pornographic or other material that would violate the law. Please note that CNN makes reasonable efforts to review all comments prior to posting and CNN may edit comments for clarity or to keep out questionable or off-topic material. All comments should be relevant to the post and remain respectful of other authors and commenters. By submitting your comment, you hereby give CNN the right, but not the obligation, to post, air, edit, exhibit, telecast, cablecast, webcast, re-use, publish, reproduce, use, license, print, distribute or otherwise use your comment(s) and accompanying personal identifying information via all forms of media now known or hereafter devised, worldwide, in perpetuity. CNN Privacy Statement.
Home  |  World  |  U.S.  |  Politics  |  Crime  |  Entertainment  |  Health  |  Tech  |  Travel  |  Living  |  Business  |  Sports  |  Time.com
Podcasts  |  Blogs  |  CNN Mobile  |  Preferences  |  Email Alerts  |  CNN Radio  |  CNN Shop  |  Site Map
© 2008 Cable News Network LP, LLLP. A Time Warner Company. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by WordPress.com