In Session: Sidebar  « Back to Blog Main
January 17, 2008
Posted: 09:55 AM ET

WASHINGTON– Film actor Wesley Snipes and presidential candidate Mike Huckabee have one thing in common. They both believe that the federal income tax laws have become so incomprehensible that the frustrated public may be ready to do something drastic about it.

Huckabee is hoping the voters will favor his radical proposal to abolish the income tax and the IRS in favor of a simple federal sales tax.

Snipes, who went on trial this week in Florida on charges of income tax fraud and conspiracy, hopes the jury will accept his story that the tax laws were so bewildering to him that he didn’t understand he was obligated to pay taxes. It’s a stretch, because Snipes was smart enough to earn $38 million dollars, yet his defense is that he couldn’t get himself together to file tax returns or pay any taxes.

At the time, Snipes was a member of a tax protest group that maintained that Americans are not legally obligated to pay income taxes. Generally, ignorance of the law is no defense, but the Supreme Court has ruled that in situations such as this, the defendant can argue to the jury that he sincerely believed he did not have to pay taxes.

Defendants have usually found this argument a tough sell. Jurors tend to believe everybody knows they have to pay taxes. Snipes has an additional problem because he gave the IRS three bad checks to cover $14 million in taxes—suggesting he realized he was required to pay.

On the face of it, Snipes’ defense (and, perhaps, Huckabee’s problematic sales tax scheme) face uphill going based on cold logic. But there’s always the chance that the public’s distaste for the convoluted tax system could strike a chord of sympathy in the jury (it only takes one to hang a jury) for Snipes’ claim that it was all more than he could understand.

The outcome would be a devastating blow to the tax system–and food for thought about the need to simplify the tax code.

Fred Graham, In Session Senior Editor

Filed under: Fred Graham


Share this on:
NANCIE   January 18th, 2008 5:54 pm ET

WHAT WAS THAT OLD SAYING……..YOU DON’T OWN PROPERTY, YOU RENT IT FROM THE GOVERNMENT. DON’T PAY YOUR TAXES AND IT BELONGS TO THEM. YEAH, NOW, LET’S PAY WITH A BAD CHECK. HOW STUPID CAN YOU BE?! WE ALL PAY SO WHY SHOULD HE BE OMITTED? HOPE HE GETS A JURY OF HARD WORKING TAX PAYING MIDDLE CLASS PEOPLE!

Tanya   January 19th, 2008 4:30 pm ET

So by the time you reach your legal age everyone knows that they are supposed to pay taxes while working. Thats the worst excuse that could be taken to court. Ridiculous! I somewhat like the actor Snipes but…the excuse is pathetic!

Fred Graham   January 21st, 2008 11:10 am ET

The irony is that Snipes will eventually have to pay the government more in back taxes, interest and penalties than he would have if he had just paid his taxes when due. What could cause such self-defeating thinking–greed?

Paul J. Johnson   January 30th, 2008 10:01 am ET

In order for the argument of “Defendants claimed they did not [Legally] have to pay Taxes, citing an obscure section of the Tax Code that establishes that [Foriegn] Sources of income for U.S. Citizens are Taxable; Protesters take that to [mean] only [Foriegn] Sources are Taxable, and “Wages” made, [earned], in this Country are not; to work or be applicable, one would have to follow the next rule of thought;
In order for this argument to have [any] merit a wage earner would have to be working for a company that has no ties to any [International] Company, which means that there is not one Company in the USA that does not have ties, of some sort, with the International Community, ie; “Banking”, “Building Materials”, “Supplies” manufactured outside the US, etc.;
There is an argument, however, for [Not] filing a Tax Return, as stated in the IRS CODE, “Where an Individual has earned wages, or have never worked - in their lifetime - No rule exists that requires [anyone] to file a Tax Return, however there is a rule that clearly states that once [You] “start” filing Tax Returns, [You] must continue to file, whether you’re employed or not.

James   January 30th, 2008 6:27 pm ET

Well Paul looks like he know the LAW. But it look that he like so many other Americans need to read their Constitution. It’s sad to see that the document that freed this nation (Constitution) has been pushed aside for a TAX CODE that enslaves out great nation.

Leave Your Comment


 

Comments are moderated by CNN, in accordance with the CNN Comment Policy, and may not appear on this blog until they have been reviewed and deemed appropriate for posting. Also, due to the volume of comments we receive, not all comments will be posted.


subscribe RSS Icon
About this blog

Sidebar takes you behind the scenes of the day's legal headlines with breaking news and in-depth analysis from In Session's anchors and correspondents.

Contributors
Ashleigh Banfield
Co-anchor of the daily trial program Banfield and Ford: Courtside
Ashleigh Banfield
Jack Ford
A former prosecutor and co-anchor of the daily trial program Banfield & Ford: Courtside
Jack Ford
Lisa Bloom
Anchor of the daily trial program Lisa Bloom: Open Court
Lisa Bloom
Jami Floyd
Former defense attorney and anchor of her own daily program Jami Floyd: Best Defense
Jami Floyd
Fred Graham
Senior Editor Fred Graham covers legal news in Washington, D.C.
Fred Graham
Jean Casarez
Attorney Jean Casarez covers trials around the country
Jean Casarez
Beth Karas
Former prosecutor Beth Karas covers trials around the country
Beth Karas
Categories
CNN Comment Policy: CNN encourages you to add a comment to this discussion. You may not post any unlawful, threatening, libelous, defamatory, obscene, pornographic or other material that would violate the law. Please note that CNN makes reasonable efforts to review all comments prior to posting and CNN may edit comments for clarity or to keep out questionable or off-topic material. All comments should be relevant to the post and remain respectful of other authors and commenters. By submitting your comment, you hereby give CNN the right, but not the obligation, to post, air, edit, exhibit, telecast, cablecast, webcast, re-use, publish, reproduce, use, license, print, distribute or otherwise use your comment(s) and accompanying personal identifying information via all forms of media now known or hereafter devised, worldwide, in perpetuity. CNN Privacy Statement.
Home  |  World  |  U.S.  |  Politics  |  Crime  |  Entertainment  |  Health  |  Tech  |  Travel  |  Living  |  Business  |  Sports  |  Time.com
Podcasts  |  Blogs  |  CNN Mobile  |  Preferences  |  Email Alerts  |  CNN Radio  |  CNN Shop  |  Site Map
© 2008 Cable News Network LP, LLLP. A Time Warner Company. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by WordPress.com